College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Sep;8(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013232.
In 2001, the WHO launched The World Health Report most specifically addressing low-income and middle-income countries (LAMICs). It highlighted the importance of mental health (MH), identifying the severe public health impacts of mental ill health and made 10 recommendations. In 2022, the WHO launched another world MH report and reaffirmed the 10 recommendations, while concluding that 'business as usual for MH will simply not do' without higher infusions of money. This paper suggests the reason for so little change over the last 20 years is due to the importation and imposition of Western MH models and frameworks of training, service development and research on the assumption they are relevant and acceptable to Africans in LAMICs. This ignores the fact that most mental and physical primary care occurs within local non-Western traditions of healthcare that are dismissed and assumed irrelevant by Western frameworks. These trusted local institutions of healthcare that operate in homes and spiritual spaces are in tune with the lives and culture of local people. We propose that Western foundations of MH knowledge are not universal nor are their assumptions of society globally applicable. Real change in the MH of LAMICs requires reimagining. Local idioms of distress and healing, and explanatory models of suffering within particular populations, are needed to guide the development of training curricula, research and services. An integration of Western frameworks into these more successful approaches are more likely to contribute to the betterment of MH for peoples in LAMICs.
2001 年,世界卫生组织发布了《世界卫生报告》,该报告主要针对低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)。它强调了心理健康的重要性,指出了心理健康不佳对公共卫生的严重影响,并提出了 10 项建议。2022 年,世界卫生组织发布了另一份世界心理健康报告,重申了这 10 项建议,同时得出结论,“如果不投入更多资金,心理健康领域的现状将不会改变”。本文认为,过去 20 年来变化如此之小的原因是,西方的心理健康模式和培训、服务开发以及研究框架被引入和强加于 LMIC 国家,而这些模式和框架被假设与非洲人有关且可以被接受。这忽略了一个事实,即大多数精神和身体的初级保健都发生在当地非西方的医疗传统中,而这些传统被西方框架所忽视和认为是不相关的。这些在家庭和精神空间中运作的值得信赖的当地医疗机构与当地人民的生活和文化息息相关。我们认为,心理健康知识的西方基础并非普遍适用,其对全球社会的假设也不具有普遍适用性。要改变 LMIC 的心理健康状况,需要重新构想。需要用当地的痛苦和治愈的习语,以及特定人群的苦难解释模型,来指导培训课程、研究和服务的发展。将西方框架融入这些更成功的方法中,更有可能有助于改善 LMIC 人民的心理健康。