Gaddis M L, Rothe C F, Tunin R S, Moran M, MacAnespie C L
Am J Physiol. 1986 Oct;251(4 Pt 2):H857-62. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1986.251.4.H857.
Three experimental series using 22 acutely splenectomized mongrel dogs were completed to 1) compare fibrillation (Fib) and acetylcholine (ACh) injection as methods to stop the heart for the mean circulatory filling pressure (Pmcf) maneuver, and 2) test whether Pmcf equals portal venous pressure 7 s after heart stoppage (Pportal7s). Blood volume changes of -10, -20, +10, or +20 ml/kg were imposed and Pmcf and Pportal measurements were obtained. Pportal7s and Pmcf were significantly different with volume depletion but were similar under control conditions. Pmcf with ACh and Pmcf with Fib were significantly different only after a volume change of -20 ml/kg. However, severe pulmonary congestion and atelectasis were detected in animals where Ach was used to stop the heart. In some cases (with injection directly into the pulmonary artery) the damage was severe enough to cause irreversible arterial hypoxia. Thus we conclude that the repeated use of ACh may exert a detrimental influence on pulmonary function, changing the physiological status of the experimental animal. Also, the central venous pressure at 7 s of heart stoppage (Pcv7s) is not a fully accurate estimate of the true mean circulatory filling pressure during the Pmcf maneuver, because Pcv7s did not equal the Pportal7s under all experimental conditions.
使用22只急性脾切除的杂种犬完成了三个实验系列,目的是:1)比较使用颤动(Fib)和注射乙酰胆碱(ACh)作为在平均循环充盈压(Pmcf)操作中使心脏停搏的方法;2)测试心脏停搏7秒后Pmcf是否等于门静脉压力(Pportal7s)。施加-10、-20、+10或+20 ml/kg的血容量变化,并获取Pmcf和Pportal测量值。血容量减少时,Pportal7s和Pmcf有显著差异,但在对照条件下相似。仅在血容量变化为-20 ml/kg后,使用ACh时的Pmcf和使用Fib时的Pmcf才有显著差异。然而,在使用ACh使心脏停搏的动物中检测到严重的肺充血和肺不张。在某些情况下(直接注入肺动脉),损伤严重到足以导致不可逆的动脉缺氧。因此,我们得出结论,重复使用ACh可能会对肺功能产生不利影响,改变实验动物的生理状态。此外,心脏停搏7秒时的中心静脉压(Pcv7s)并非对Pmcf操作期间真正平均循环充盈压的完全准确估计,因为在所有实验条件下Pcv7s都不等于Pportal7s。