Siegel K
Am J Psychother. 1986 Jul;40(3):405-18. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1986.40.3.405.
In recent years a more tolerant attitude has emerged concerning suicide as an acceptable alternative to some life situations. This trend is attributable in large part to the growth of the "Rationale Suicide" movement. Proponents of rational suicide have consistently offered the terminally ill cancer patient in intractable pain as the paradigmatic case on which their position rests. Once having established the principle, however, they would extend the right-to-suicide to any individual who felt his life was not worth living, for any reason. They would also wish to institute a law to protect the individual's right to end his life. While the basic argument for rational suicide may seem reasonable, serious limitations in the position are demonstrated when it is examined in light of existing clinical and research findings. Unanticipated adverse individual and societal consequences that can result from extending and legally safeguarding the right-to-suicide were reviewed. Evidence was also presented that individuals who contemplate what they regard as a rational suicide may have much in common psychodynamically with the much more numerous suicides that occur each year and which are clearly desperate and tragic acts.
近年来,对于自杀出现了一种更为宽容的态度,认为在某些生活状况下自杀是一种可接受的选择。这种趋势在很大程度上归因于“理性自杀”运动的发展。理性自杀的支持者一直将患有晚期癌症且疼痛难忍的患者作为其立场的典型案例。然而,一旦确立了这一原则,他们就会将自杀权扩展到任何因任何原因觉得自己的生命不值得活下去的人。他们还希望制定一项法律来保护个人结束自己生命的权利。虽然支持理性自杀的基本论点可能看起来合理,但当根据现有的临床和研究结果进行审视时,该立场存在严重局限性。本文回顾了扩大并在法律上保障自杀权可能导致的意外的个体和社会不良后果。文中还提供了证据表明,那些考虑他们所认为的理性自杀的人与每年发生的数量更多的自杀者在心理动力学方面有许多共同之处,而后者显然是绝望和悲剧性的行为。