Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Phys Ther. 2023 Oct 3;103(10). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad120.
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the effect of twice-weekly, moderate-to-high intensity progressive resistance training (PRT) for 1 year on lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in individuals with low BMD, compared to attention control. Secondary analyses will examine if resistance training improves other health outcomes; if high intensity is more effective than moderate intensity resistance training for all outcomes; the cost of intervention versus benefit; the willingness to pay; and harms.
For this study, 324 men or postmenopausal women aged ≥50 years with a femoral neck, total hip, or lumbar spine BMD T-score of ≤-1, or a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool probability of ≥20% for major osteoporotic fracture or ≥ 3% for hip fracture are being recruited to participate in a randomized controlled trial with 1:1:1 randomization. Participants will be stratified by site (3 centers) to twice-weekly, supervised PRT at moderate intensity (about 10 repetitions maximum), to high intensity PRT (≤6 repetitions maximum), or to a home posture and balance exercise program (attention control) for 1 year (resistance training to comparator allocation ratio of 2:1). The primary outcome is lumbar spine BMD via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Secondary outcomes include trabecular bone score, proximal femur and total hip BMD and structure, bone-free and appendicular lean mass, physical functioning, falls, fractures, glucose metabolism, cost per life-year gained, adverse events, and quality of life. Between-group differences will be tested in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses using analysis of covariance, chi-square tests, or negative binomial or logistic regression, adjusting for site and baseline values.
The Finding the Optimal Resistance Training Intensity For Your Bones trial will support decision making on resistance training for people at risk of fracture.
本试验旨在评估与对照相比,每周两次、中高强度的渐进式抗阻训练(PRT)对低骨密度者腰椎骨密度(BMD)的影响,时间为 1 年。次要分析将检查抗阻训练是否能改善其他健康结果;高强度是否比中强度对所有结果更有效;干预成本与收益;支付意愿;以及危害。
在这项研究中,正在招募 324 名年龄≥50 岁的男性或绝经后女性,他们的股骨颈、全髋或腰椎 BMD T 评分≤-1,或骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)预测的主要骨质疏松性骨折概率≥20%,或髋部骨折概率≥3%。这些参与者将按照地点(3 个中心)进行分层,随机分为每周两次、监督的中强度 PRT(约 10 次最大重复次数)、高强度 PRT(≤6 次最大重复次数)或家庭姿势和平衡运动方案(对照),时间为 1 年(抗阻训练与比较组的分配比例为 2:1)。主要结局是腰椎 BMD,通过双能 X 线吸收法测量。次要结局包括小梁骨评分、股骨近端和全髋 BMD 和结构、无骨和四肢瘦体重、身体功能、跌倒、骨折、葡萄糖代谢、每获得 1 年生命的成本、不良事件和生活质量。意向治疗和方案分析将采用协方差分析、卡方检验或负二项式或逻辑回归进行组间差异检验,调整地点和基线值。
“寻找最适合骨骼的抗阻训练强度”试验将为有骨折风险的人群提供关于抗阻训练的决策依据。