• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.GRIPP2报告清单:改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
BMJ. 2017 Aug 2;358:j3453. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3453.
2
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.GRIPP2报告清单:用于改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Aug 2;3:13. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0062-2. eCollection 2017.
3
Reaching consensus on reporting patient and public involvement (PPI) in research: methods and lessons learned from the development of reporting guidelines.就研究中患者和公众参与(PPI)的报告达成共识:制定报告指南的方法及经验教训
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e016948. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016948.
4
Reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research publications: using the GRIPP2 checklists with lay co-researchers.研究出版物中患者及公众参与(PPI)的报告:与非专业共同研究者使用GRIPP2清单
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 22;7(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00295-w.
5
Systematic review on the frequency and quality of reporting patient and public involvement in patient safety research.关于患者及公众参与患者安全研究报告的频率与质量的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 26;24(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11021-z.
6
The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research.GRIPP 清单:提高患者和公众参与研究报告的质量。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Oct;27(4):391-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000481.
7
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.报告结局测量工具(OMIs)系统评价的指南:2024 年 OMIs 的 PRISMA-COSMIN。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jul 9;8(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00727-7.
8
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.系统评价报告结局测量工具(OMIs)的指南:PRISMA-COSMIN 对 OMIs 的 2024 年修订版。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Jul 9;22(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02256-9.
9
Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement.医疗干预措施系统评价概述报告规范:PRIOR 声明的制定。
BMJ. 2022 Aug 9;378:e070849. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070849.
10
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.报告结局测量工具(OMIs)系统评价的指南:PRISMA-COSMIN 2024 版。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Aug;33(8):2029-2046. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03634-y. Epub 2024 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Delivering public health advice to sign language users: a qualitative study with key stakeholders.向手语使用者提供公共卫生建议:一项与关键利益相关者的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 3;15(9):e098040. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098040.
2
Improving the reporting on health equity in observational research (STROBE-Equity): extension checklist and elaboration.改进观察性研究中健康公平性的报告(STROBE-公平性):扩展清单及阐述
BMJ. 2025 Sep 3;390:e083882. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-083882.
3
Patient and healthcare professional perspectives on which potential prognostic factors for failure of total elbow replacement should be investigated.患者与医疗保健专业人员对于全肘关节置换失败的潜在预后因素应予以研究的观点。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Aug 30;20(1):808. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06186-0.
4
'There has to be some chemistry there': an interpretive description exploring the experiences, motivations and dynamics of partnered child health research.“那里必须存在某种化学反应”:一项探索合作儿童健康研究的经历、动机和动态的诠释性描述
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Aug 29;11(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00777-1.
5
What Service Characteristics Are Important to Patients Treated in Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy Services: Designing a Discrete Choice Experiment.对于接受肌肉骨骼物理治疗服务的患者而言,哪些服务特征至关重要:设计一项离散选择实验。
Musculoskeletal Care. 2025 Sep;23(3):e70175. doi: 10.1002/msc.70175.
6
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
CMAJ. 2025 Aug 24;197(28):E874-E892. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.241584-f.
7
Recommendations on interventions for tobacco smoking cessation in adults in Canada.加拿大成年人戒烟干预措施建议。
CMAJ. 2025 Aug 24;197(28):E846-E861. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.241584.
8
Targeting everyday decision makers in research: early career researcher and patient and public involvement and engagement collaboration in an AI-in-healthcare project.针对研究中的日常决策者:早期职业研究人员与患者及公众参与和参与人工智能医疗保健项目的合作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Aug 19;11(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00753-9.
9
A review of acknowledgement and payment preferences of contributors on a register of patient public involvement in brain injury research.对脑损伤研究患者公众参与登记册上贡献者的致谢和支付偏好的综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Aug 19;11(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00772-6.
10
Understanding a Minority Group's (Roma) Experiences of Access and Quality in Maternity Services.了解少数群体(罗姆人)在孕产妇服务中的就医经历及服务质量。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70389. doi: 10.1111/hex.70389.

本文引用的文献

1
One small step….一小步……
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Jun 25;1:1. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0005-8. eCollection 2015.
2
Reaching consensus on reporting patient and public involvement (PPI) in research: methods and lessons learned from the development of reporting guidelines.就研究中患者和公众参与(PPI)的报告达成共识:制定报告指南的方法及经验教训
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e016948. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016948.
3
A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.患者和公众参与对服务使用者、研究人员和社区影响的系统评价。
Patient. 2014;7(4):387-95. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0065-0.
4
Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.患者参与研究:一项系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89.
5
Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework.患者及服务使用者参与研究:一项系统综述与综合框架
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1151-66. doi: 10.1111/hex.12090. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
6
Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review.探究患者及公众参与对健康和社会照护研究的影响:一项系统综述
Health Expect. 2014 Oct;17(5):637-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
7
The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review.患者和公众参与对英国国民保健制度医疗保健的影响:系统评价。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Feb;24(1):28-38. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr066. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
8
The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research.GRIPP 清单:提高患者和公众参与研究报告的质量。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Oct;27(4):391-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000481.
9
Introducing patients' and the public's perspectives to health technology assessment: A systematic review of international experiences.将患者和公众的观点引入健康技术评估:国际经验的系统评价。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Jan;27(1):31-42. doi: 10.1017/S0266462310001315.
10
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.CONSORT 2010解释与详述:平行组随机试验报告的更新指南
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869.

GRIPP2报告清单:改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。

GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.

作者信息

Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, Seers K, Mockford C, Goodlad S, Altman D G, Moher D, Barber R, Denegri S, Entwistle A, Littlejohns P, Morris C, Suleman R, Thomas V, Tysall C

机构信息

Warwick Research in Nursing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK

Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2017 Aug 2;358:j3453. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3453.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.j3453
PMID:28768629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5539518/
Abstract

While the patient and public involvement (PPI) evidence base has expanded over the past decade, the quality of reporting within papers is often inconsistent, limiting our understanding of how it works, in what context, for whom, and why. To develop international consensus on the key items to report to enhance the quality, transparency, and consistency of the PPI evidence base. To collaboratively involve patients as research partners at all stages in the development of GRIPP2. The EQUATOR method for developing reporting guidelines was used. The original GRIPP (Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public) checklist was revised, based on updated systematic review evidence. A three round Delphi survey was used to develop consensus on items to be included in the guideline. A subsequent face-to-face meeting produced agreement on items not reaching consensus during the Delphi process. 143 participants agreed to participate in round one, with an 86% (123/143) response for round two and a 78% (112/143) response for round three. The Delphi survey identified the need for long form (LF) and short form (SF) versions. GRIPP2-LF includes 34 items on aims, definitions, concepts and theory, methods, stages and nature of involvement, context, capture or measurement of impact, outcomes, economic assessment, and reflections and is suitable for studies where the main focus is PPI. GRIPP2-SF includes five items on aims, methods, results, outcomes, and critical perspective and is suitable for studies where PPI is a secondary focus. GRIPP2-LF and GRIPP2-SF represent the first international evidence based, consensus informed guidance for reporting patient and public involvement in research. Both versions of GRIPP2 aim to improve the quality, transparency, and consistency of the international PPI evidence base, to ensure PPI practice is based on the best evidence. In order to encourage its wide dissemination this article is freely accessible on and journal websites.

摘要

尽管患者及公众参与(PPI)的证据基础在过去十年中有所扩展,但论文中的报告质量往往参差不齐,这限制了我们对其运作方式、适用背景、受众群体及原因的理解。为就提高PPI证据基础的质量、透明度和一致性所需报告的关键项目达成国际共识。在GRIPP2的制定过程中,让患者作为研究伙伴共同参与各个阶段。采用了EQUATOR制定报告指南的方法。基于最新的系统评价证据,对最初的GRIPP(患者及公众参与报告指南)清单进行了修订。通过三轮德尔菲调查就指南中应包含的项目达成共识。随后的面对面会议就德尔菲过程中未达成共识的项目达成了一致意见。143名参与者同意参加第一轮调查,第二轮的回复率为86%(123/143),第三轮的回复率为78%(112/143)。德尔菲调查确定了需要长篇(LF)和短篇(SF)版本。GRIPP2-LF包括关于目的、定义、概念和理论、方法、参与阶段和性质、背景、影响的捕捉或测量、结果、经济评估以及反思等34个项目,适用于主要关注PPI的研究。GRIPP2-SF包括关于目的、方法、结果、成果和批判性视角等5个项目,适用于PPI为次要关注点的研究。GRIPP2-LF和GRIPP2-SF代表了首个基于国际证据、经共识形成的关于报告患者及公众参与研究的指南。GRIPP2的两个版本旨在提高国际PPI证据基础的质量、透明度和一致性,确保PPI实践基于最佳证据。为鼓励广泛传播,本文可在 和 期刊网站上免费获取。