Zhan Zheng, Gu Feng, Ji Yi, Zhang Yu, Ge Yi, Wang Zhong
Department of Neurosurgery and Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Changzhou Second People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Front Neurol. 2023 Aug 17;14:1185554. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1185554. eCollection 2023.
In recent years, several studies have used computed tomography perfusion (CTP) to assess whether mechanical thrombectomy can be performed in patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke in an extended time window. However, it has the disadvantage of being time-consuming and expensive. This study aimed to compare the impact of the CTP group with the non-CTP group [non-contrast CT (NCCT) ± CT angiography (CTA)] on the prognosis of this patient population.
A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the two strategies. Outcome indicators and factors influencing prognosis were summarized by standardized mean differences, ratios, and relative risks with 95% confidence intervals using a random-effects model.
A total of two RCTs were included in the combined analysis. There were no significant differences in the main outcome indicators (modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days, successful postoperative reperfusion rate) or the incidence of adverse events (90-day mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage) between the NCCT ± CTA and CTP groups. The time from the last puncture appeared to be significantly shorter in the NCCT ± CTA group than in the CTP group (SMD: -0.14; 95% CI: -0.24, -0.04). Among them, age (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.94, 0.98), ASPECTS (OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.24), NIHSS score (OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.89, 0.91), and diabetes (OR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.88) were associated with a 90-day independent functional outcome.
These findings suggest that the choice of NCCT ± CTA (without CTP) for the assessment of mechanical thrombectomy within 6-24 h after LVO in the anterior circulation is not significantly different from CTP; instead, the choice of NCCT ± CTA significantly reduces the time from onset to arterial puncture.
近年来,多项研究采用计算机断层扫描灌注成像(CTP)来评估在延长时间窗内,大动脉闭塞(LVO)性卒中患者是否可行机械取栓术。然而,其存在耗时且费用高昂的缺点。本研究旨在比较CTP组与非CTP组[非增强CT(NCCT)±CT血管造影(CTA)]对该患者群体预后的影响。
检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库,以收集比较这两种策略的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用随机效应模型,通过标准化均数差、比值和相对危险度及95%置信区间,总结影响预后的结局指标和因素。
联合分析共纳入两项RCT。NCCT±CTA组与CTP组在主要结局指标(90天时改良Rankin量表评分、术后成功再灌注率)或不良事件发生率(90天死亡率和有症状颅内出血)方面无显著差异。NCCT±CTA组从最后一次穿刺开始的时间似乎比CTP组显著更短(标准化均数差:-0.14;95%置信区间:-0.24,-0.04)。其中,年龄(比值比:0.96;95%置信区间:0.94,0.98)、ASPECTS评分(比值比:1.18;95%置信区间:1.12,1.24)、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分(比值比:0.90;95%置信区间:0.89,0.91)和糖尿病(比值比:0.69;95%置信区间:0.54,0.88)与90天独立功能结局相关。
这些研究结果表明,在前循环LVO后6 - 24小时内评估机械取栓术时,选择NCCT±CTA(不进行CTP)与CTP相比无显著差异;相反,选择NCCT±CTA可显著缩短从发病到动脉穿刺的时间。