Visual outcome of treating proliferative sickle cell retinopathy in 108 eyes.

AIM

To report treatment methods and visual outcome of treating proliferative sickle cell retinopathy (PSCR).

DESIGN

Retrospective interventional.

METHODS

Review of PSCR eyes treated between 2017 to 2022. Patient demographics, fundus findings at presentation, genotype, PSCR stage, treatment used, and visual outcome were assessed.

RESULTS

108 eyes of 88 consecutive patients were studied. Male: Female 48:40. Mean age: 38.91 (SD:12.52) years. Genotype: sickle cell haemoglobin C (SC) 83 eyes (76.9%), sickle cell haemoglobin S (SS) 19 eyes (17.6%), and sickle cell trait (AS) 6 eyes (5.5%). PSCR stages: 3: 15 eyes (11.0%), 4: 74 eyes (67.0%), and 5: 19 eyes (22.0%). Treatment methods: Intravitreal Injection (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) only (27 eyes,25%), scatter retinal laser photocoagulation (SRLP) only (7 eyes, 6.5%), Vitrectomy + SRLP (29 eyes, 26.9%), IVI + SRLP (25 eyes, 23.1%), and Vitrectomy + IVI + SRLP (20 eyes, 18.5%). The treatment used correlated with PSCR stage (p = 0.000). IVI only was mostly used to treat stage 4 (81.4%), and SRLP only was used for stages 3 (42.9%) and 5 (57.1%). IVI + SRLP treated eyes had the best pre- and post-treatment vision. Vitrectomy + SRLP treated eyes had the most improved vision. SRLP only had least visual improvement. Fundus findings correlated with visual outcome (p = 0.003); but stage of PSCR, genotype and treatment used had no correlation (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Several options effectively treat PSCR. Visual outcome improved or remained same in 90.7% of treated eyes. Randomized controlled trials will determine the optimum treatment for each distinct presentation of PSCR. Treatment guidelines and a disease classification system of prognostic value are unmet needs.