Henson Theresa, Velasquez Ricardo, Martin Alvaro, Kozlova Natalya, Chandy Dipak, Epelbaum Oleg
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine Westchester Medical Center Valhalla New York USA.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Saint Barnabas Health Bronx New York USA.
Acute Med Surg. 2023 Sep 4;10(1):e889. doi: 10.1002/ams2.889. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is considered a possible source of non-infectious, non-central fever in the intensive care unit (ICU). In the neurocritically ill, it is unknown whether lower extremity venous Doppler ultrasonography (LEVDUS) for DVT in the setting of fever leads to a higher detection rate than the baseline detection rate of DVT in this population. The aim of this study was to compare the DVT detection rate of LEVDUS performed for the indication of fever to LEVDUS performed for other indications in a neurosciences ICU.
Requisition forms for all LEVDUS performed in a referral neurosciences ICU were reviewed and separated into those with "fever" as the stated reason for request and those with other stated reasons. The DVT detection rate was compared between these two categories of indications.
Five hundred eleven LEVDUS were analyzed, of which 422 had been ordered for indications other than fever. Sixteen of these tests were positive, a detection rate of 3.8%. The remaining 89 LEVDUS had "fever" as the ordering indication. Six of these tests were positive for DVT, a detection rate of 6.7%. The likelihood of positivity of a test obtained as part of fever evaluation relative to one obtained for non-fever indications was not significantly different (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 0.570-5.11; = 0.246).
LEVDUS triggered by fever detected DVT at a numerically, but not statistically significantly higher rate than did LEVDUS performed for other indications in a neurocritically ill population. More rigorous investigation of this question is needed.
深静脉血栓形成(DVT)被认为是重症监护病房(ICU)非感染性、非中枢性发热的一个可能来源。在神经重症患者中,发热情况下用于检测DVT的下肢静脉多普勒超声检查(LEVDUS)的检出率是否高于该人群中DVT的基线检出率尚不清楚。本研究的目的是比较在神经科学ICU中,因发热指征进行的LEVDUS与因其他指征进行的LEVDUS的DVT检出率。
回顾了一家转诊神经科学ICU中所有进行LEVDUS的申请单,并将其分为以“发热”作为申请理由的和以其他理由申请的。比较这两类指征的DVT检出率。
共分析了511次LEVDUS,其中422次是因发热以外的指征进行的。这些检查中有16次呈阳性,检出率为3.8%。其余89次LEVDUS以“发热”作为申请指征。这些检查中有6次DVT呈阳性,检出率为6.7%。作为发热评估一部分进行的检查相对于非发热指征检查的阳性可能性无显著差异(比值比,1.83;95%置信区间,0.570 - 5.11;P = 0.246)。
在神经重症患者中,因发热触发的LEVDUS检测DVT的数值检出率高于因其他指征进行的LEVDUS,但无统计学显著差异。对此问题需要进行更严格的研究。