• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输卵管切除术用于卵巢癌的一级预防:系统评价。

Salpingectomy for the Primary Prevention of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Medical Library, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2023 Nov 1;158(11):1204-1211. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4164.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4164
PMID:37672283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11185162/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Most ovarian cancers originate in the fimbriated end of the fallopian tube. This has led to the hypothesis that surgical resection of the fallopian tubes at the time of gynecologic and nongynecologic surgical procedures-referred to as an opportunistic salpingectomy-may prevent the development of epithelial ovarian cancer for women at an average risk of developing the disease.

OBJECTIVE

To compile a comprehensive, state-of-the-science review examining the current landscape of performing bilateral salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A systematic review of the literature was performed on March 4, 2022, to identify studies examining salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention. This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Four databases were selected: PubMed via the National Library of Medicine's PubMed.gov, Embase via Elsevier's Embase.com, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via Wiley's Cochrane Library, and Northern Light Life Sciences Conference Abstracts via Ovid. A total of 20 gray literature sources, including 1 database, 2 registers, 1 repository, 1 index, 1 archive, 1 preprint server, 1 agency, and 12 organizations, were also searched.

FINDINGS

The initial search produced 1089 results; a total of 158 publications were included in the final review. Salpingectomy has been associated with ovarian cancer risk reduction of approximately 80%. Studies have demonstrated that salpingectomy was safe, cost-effective, and was not associated with an earlier age of menopause onset. With widespread implementation, salpingectomy has the potential to reduce ovarian cancer mortality in the US by an estimated 15%. Both physician and patient awareness regarding the adnexa as the origin for most ovarian cancers, as well as the existence of salpingectomy and its potential benefits in reducing ovarian cancer risk, has increased during the past decade. Raising awareness and developing effective implementation strategies are essential.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The results of this systematic review suggest that bilateral salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention was safe and feasible and has the potential to be a cost-effective and cost-saving strategy across the population. Prospective studies to demonstrate long-term survival outcomes and feasibility in nongynecologic surgical procedures are warranted.

摘要

重要性

大多数卵巢癌起源于输卵管的伞端。这导致了这样一种假设,即在妇科和非妇科手术时切除输卵管——即所谓的机会性输卵管切除术——可能会预防平均患病风险的女性发生上皮性卵巢癌。

目的

编纂一份全面的、基于科学的综述,审查目前为预防卵巢癌而行双侧输卵管切除术的情况。

证据综述

于 2022 年 3 月 4 日对文献进行了系统综述,以确定研究输卵管切除术预防卵巢癌的研究。本综述是根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 2020 声明进行的。选择了四个数据库:美国国家医学图书馆的 PubMed.gov 上的 PubMed、Elsevier 的 Embase.com 上的 Embase、Wiley 的 Cochrane 图书馆上的 Cochrane 中央对照试验注册中心 (CENTRAL),以及 Ovid 上的 Northern Light 生命科学会议摘要。还搜索了 20 个灰色文献来源,包括 1 个数据库、2 个登记处、1 个存储库、1 个索引、1 个档案、1 个预印本服务器、1 个机构和 12 个组织。

发现

最初的搜索产生了 1089 个结果;共有 158 篇出版物被纳入最终综述。输卵管切除术与卵巢癌风险降低约 80%相关。研究表明,输卵管切除术是安全的、具有成本效益的,并且与绝经年龄提前无关。如果广泛实施,输卵管切除术有可能使美国的卵巢癌死亡率降低约 15%。在过去的十年中,医生和患者对附件是大多数卵巢癌的起源的认识,以及输卵管切除术的存在及其在降低卵巢癌风险方面的潜在益处,都有所增加。提高认识和制定有效的实施策略至关重要。

结论和相关性

本系统综述的结果表明,双侧输卵管切除术预防卵巢癌是安全可行的,有可能成为整个人群具有成本效益和节省成本的策略。需要进行前瞻性研究以证明长期生存结果,并在非妇科手术中证明其可行性。

相似文献

1
Salpingectomy for the Primary Prevention of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review.输卵管切除术用于卵巢癌的一级预防:系统评价。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Nov 1;158(11):1204-1211. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4164.
2
No. 344-Opportunistic Salpingectomy and Other Methods of Risk Reduction for Ovarian/Fallopian Tube/Peritoneal Cancer in the General Population.第344号——普通人群中卵巢/输卵管/腹膜癌的机会性输卵管切除术及其他降低风险方法。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Jun;39(6):480-493. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.12.005.
3
Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone.全子宫切除术加选择性输卵管切除术与单纯全子宫切除术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 28;8(8):CD012858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012858.pub2.
4
Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Urogynecologic Surgery: Why, in Whom, and How?机会性输卵管切除术在泌尿妇科手术中的应用:为何、针对谁以及如何实施?
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jun;26(6):401-406. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000741.
5
Efficacy of salpingectomy at hysterectomy to reduce the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review.子宫切除术时行输卵管切除术以降低上皮性卵巢癌风险的疗效:系统评价。
BJOG. 2017 May;124(6):880-889. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14601.
6
The impact of opportunistic salpingectomy on ovarian cancer mortality and healthcare costs: a call for universal insurance coverage.预防性输卵管切除术对卵巢癌死亡率和医疗保健成本的影响:呼吁普遍保险覆盖。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):397.e1-397.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.032. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
7
Examining indicators of early menopause following opportunistic salpingectomy: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.探讨加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省机会性输卵管切除术(salpingectomy)后早绝经的指标:一项队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):221.e1-221.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
8
Tips and Tricks for Performing Salpingectomy at the Time of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.腹腔镜子宫切除术时行输卵管切除术的技巧与窍门
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Feb;24(2):205. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
9
Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention.机会性输卵管切除术预防卵巢癌的成本效益
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Aug;146(2):373-379. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.05.034. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
10
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 774 Summary: Opportunistic Salpingectomy as a Strategy for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Prevention.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见第 774 号概要:作为上皮性卵巢癌预防策略的机会性输卵管切除术。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;133(4):842-843. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003165.

引用本文的文献

1
From Fallopian Tube to Ovarian Cancer: Understanding the Evaluation and Management of Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma Lesions.从输卵管到卵巢癌:了解浆液性输卵管上皮内癌病变的评估与管理
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s11864-025-01346-0.
2
Gauging the Magnitude of Missed Opportunity for Ovarian Cancer Prevention.评估卵巢癌预防错失机会的程度。
JAMA Surg. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.2810.
3
Advances in hybrid hydrogel design for biomedical applications: innovations in drug delivery and tissue engineering for gynecological cancers.用于生物医学应用的混合水凝胶设计进展:妇科癌症药物递送与组织工程的创新
Cell Biol Toxicol. 2025 Jul 12;41(1):115. doi: 10.1007/s10565-025-10064-0.
4
New opportunities for opportunistic salpingectomy: Leveraging non-gynecologic surgeries for ovarian cancer prevention.机会性输卵管切除术的新机遇:利用非妇科手术预防卵巢癌
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025 Mar 13;58:101720. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2025.101720. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Spatial transcriptomic profiling of the human fallopian tube epithelium reveals region-specific gene expression patterns.人输卵管上皮的空间转录组分析揭示了区域特异性基因表达模式。
Commun Biol. 2025 Mar 29;8(1):520. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07871-w.
6
Big data analysis and machine learning of the role of cuproptosis-related long non-coding RNAs (CuLncs) in the prognosis and immune landscape of ovarian cancer.铜死亡相关长链非编码RNA(CuLncs)在卵巢癌预后和免疫格局中的作用的大数据分析与机器学习
Front Immunol. 2025 Feb 25;16:1555782. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1555782. eCollection 2025.
7
Evaluating Ovarian Cancer Risk-Reducing Salpingectomy Acceptance: A Survey.评估降低卵巢癌风险的输卵管切除术的接受度:一项调查。
Cancer Res Commun. 2025 Jan 1;5(1):187-194. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-24-0566.
8
Worldwide patterns and trends in ovarian cancer incidence by histological subtype: a population-based analysis from 1988 to 2017.按组织学亚型划分的全球卵巢癌发病率模式与趋势:一项基于人群的1988年至2017年分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Dec 6;79:102983. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102983. eCollection 2025 Jan.
9
Clinicopathological analysis of giant ovarian tumors.巨大卵巢肿瘤的临床病理分析
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2024 May 24;22:100318. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100318. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Is There Still a Role for Sterilization by Tubal Ligation as a Contraceptive Method?输卵管结扎绝育术作为一种避孕方法还有作用吗?
Open Access J Contracept. 2024 May 27;15:85-87. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S459623. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Racial and ethnic differences in the adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States.美国在采用预防性输卵管切除术降低卵巢癌发病风险方面的种族和民族差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):257.e1-257.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.036. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
2
STop OVarian CAncer (STOPOVCA) young: Protocol for a multicenter follow-up study to determine the long-term effects of opportunistic salpingectomy on age at menopause.停止卵巢癌(STOPOVCA)青年组:一项多中心随访研究的方案,以确定机会性输卵管切除术对绝经年龄的长期影响。
Maturitas. 2022 May;159:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
3
Outcomes From Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Ovarian Cancer Prevention.机会性输卵管切除术预防卵巢癌的结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2147343. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.47343.
4
Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Ovarian Cancer Prevention: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术时行机会性输卵管切除术预防卵巢癌:成本效益分析。
Ann Surg. 2023 May 1;277(5):e1116-e1123. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005374. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
5
Uptake and Predictors of Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Ovarian Cancer Risk Reduction in the United States.美国降低卵巢癌风险的机会性输卵管切除术的接受情况和预测因素。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Dec;14(12):1101-1110. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0121. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
6
Patients' and professionals' perspectives on implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy: a mixed-method study.患者和专业人员对机会性输卵管切除术实施的看法:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 25;21(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06767-9.
7
Physician attitudes and knowledge on prophylactic salpingectomy in perimenopausal patients.医生对围绝经期患者预防性输卵管切除术的态度和知识
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2021 Jun 30;37:100824. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100824. eCollection 2021 Aug.
8
Paradigm shift from tubal ligation to opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery in the United States.美国剖宫产术中从输卵管结扎到偶然输卵管切除术的范式转变。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):399.e1-399.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.074. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
9
The impact of opportunistic salpingectomy on ovarian cancer mortality and healthcare costs: a call for universal insurance coverage.预防性输卵管切除术对卵巢癌死亡率和医疗保健成本的影响:呼吁普遍保险覆盖。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):397.e1-397.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.032. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
10
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.