Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Ophthalmol Retina. 2024 Feb;8(2):108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2023.08.019. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
Microaneurysms (MAs) have distinct, oval-shaped, hyperreflective walls on structural OCT, and inconsistent flow signal in the lumen with OCT angiography (OCTA). Their relationship to regional macular edema in diabetic retinopathy (DR) has not been quantitatively explored.
Retrospective, cross-sectional study.
A total of 99 participants, including 23 with mild, nonproliferative DR (NPDR), 25 with moderate NPDR, 34 with severe NPDR, and 17 with proliferative DR.
We obtained 3 × 3-mm scans with a commercial device (Solix, Visionix/Optovue) in 99 patients with DR. Trained graders manually identified MAs and their location relative to the anatomic layers from cross-sectional OCT. Microaneurysms were first classified as perfused if flow signal was present in the OCTA channel. Then, perfused MAs were further classified into fully and partially perfused MAs based on the flow characteristics in en face OCTA. The presence of retinal fluid based on OCT near MAs was compared between perfused and nonperfused types. We also compared OCT-based MA detection to fundus photography (FP)- and fluorescein angiography (FA)-based detection.
OCT-identified MAs can be classified according to colocalized OCTA flow signal into fully perfused, partially perfused, and nonperfused types. Fully perfused MAs may be more likely to be associated with diabetic macular edema (DME) than those without flow.
We identified 308 MAs (166 fully perfused, 88 partially perfused, 54 nonperfused) in 42 eyes using OCT and OCTA. Nearly half of the MAs identified in this study straddle the inner nuclear layer and outer plexiform layer. Compared with partially perfused and nonperfused MAs, fully perfused MAs were more likely to be associated with local retinal fluid. The associated fluid volumes were larger with fully perfused MAs compared with other types. OCT/OCTA detected all MAs found on FP. Although not all MAs seen with FA were identified with OCT, some MAs seen with OCT were not visible with FA or FP.
OCT-identified MAs with colocalized flow on OCTA are more likely to be associated with DME than those without flow.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
在结构光 OCT 上,微动脉瘤(MA)具有独特的椭圆形、高反射性壁,在 OCT 血管造影(OCTA)中管腔显示不一致的血流信号。它们与糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的局部黄斑水肿之间的关系尚未被定量研究。
回顾性、横断面研究。
共有 99 名参与者,包括 23 名轻度非增生性 DR(NPDR)患者、25 名中度 NPDR 患者、34 名重度 NPDR 患者和 17 名增生性 DR 患者。
我们使用商业设备(Solix,Visionix/Optovue)对 99 例 DR 患者进行了 3×3mm 扫描。经过培训的分级员从横截面 OCT 手动识别 MA 及其相对于解剖层的位置。如果 OCTA 通道中有血流信号,则首先将 MA 分类为灌注型。然后,根据 EnFace OCTA 的血流特征,将灌注型 MA 进一步分类为完全灌注型和部分灌注型。比较 OCT 附近灌注型和非灌注型 MA 之间的视网膜液存在情况。我们还比较了 OCT 检测到的 MA 与眼底照相(FP)和荧光素血管造影(FA)检测到的 MA。
根据共定位 OCTA 血流信号,OCT 识别的 MA 可分为完全灌注型、部分灌注型和非灌注型。与无血流的 MA 相比,完全灌注型 MA 更可能与糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)相关。
我们使用 OCT 和 OCTA 在 42 只眼中识别出 308 个 MA(166 个完全灌注型、88 个部分灌注型、54 个非灌注型)。本研究中发现的 MA 近一半位于内核层和外丛状层之间。与部分灌注型和非灌注型 MA 相比,完全灌注型 MA 更有可能与局部视网膜液相关。与其他类型相比,完全灌注型 MA 的相关液体积较大。OCT/OCTA 检测到 FP 上发现的所有 MA。尽管 FA 上发现的并非所有 MA 都能用 OCT 识别,但一些用 OCT 发现的 MA 在 FA 或 FP 上不可见。
OCT 识别出的与 OCTA 共定位血流的 MA 与 DME 相关的可能性大于无血流的 MA。
本文末尾的脚注和披露中可能包含专有或商业披露信息。