Nagase Hiroaki, Yamaguchi Hiroshi, Tokumoto Shoichi, Ishida Yusuke, Tomioka Kazumi, Nishiyama Masahiro, Nozu Kandai, Maruyama Azusa
Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Department of Neurology, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Front Neurosci. 2023 Aug 22;17:1150868. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1150868. eCollection 2023.
Our goal was to conduct a scoping review of the literature on the treatment of infection-triggered encephalopathy syndrome/acute encephalopathy in children, focusing on treatment targets and treatment initiation timing. We performed literature searches using PubMed for articles reporting treatments of infection-triggered encephalopathy syndrome/acute encephalopathy. We included articles describing specific treatments for acute encephalopathy with control groups. For the purpose of searching new therapies only experimentally tried in the case series, we also included case series studies without control groups in this review, if the studies contained at least two cases with clear treatment goals. Therapies were classified based on their mechanisms of action into brain protection therapy, immunotherapy, and other therapies. We operationally categorized the timing of treatment initiation as T1 (6-12 h), T2 (12-24 h), T3 (24-48 h), and T4 (>48 h) after the onset of seizures and/or impaired consciousness. Thirty articles were included in this review; no randomized control study was found. Eleven retrospective/historical cohort studies and five case-control studies included control groups with or without specific therapies or outcomes. The targeted conditions and treatment timing varied widely across studies. However, the following three points were suggested to be effective in multiple studies: (1) Careful seizure management and targeted temperature management within 12 h (T1) of onset of febrile seizure/prolonged impaired consciousness without multiple organ failure may reduce the development of acute encephalopathy with biphasic seizures and late reduced diffusion; (2) immunotherapy using corticosteroids, tocilizumab, or plasma exchange within 24 h (T1-T2) of onset of acute necrotizing encephalopathy may reduce sequelae; and (3) anakinra therapy and ketogenic diet demonstrate little evidence of neurologic sequelae reduction, but may reduce seizure frequency and allow for weaning from barbiturates, even when administered weeks (T4) after onset in children with febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome. Although available studies have no solid evidence in the treatment of infection-triggered encephalopathy syndrome/acute encephalopathy, this scoping review lays the groundwork for future prospective clinical trials.
我们的目标是对关于儿童感染引发的脑病综合征/急性脑病治疗的文献进行范围综述,重点关注治疗靶点和治疗起始时机。我们使用PubMed进行文献检索,查找报告感染引发的脑病综合征/急性脑病治疗的文章。我们纳入了描述有对照组的急性脑病具体治疗方法的文章。为了搜索仅在病例系列中进行过实验性尝试的新疗法,本综述还纳入了无对照组的病例系列研究,前提是这些研究至少包含两例有明确治疗目标的病例。治疗方法根据其作用机制分为脑保护治疗、免疫治疗和其他治疗。我们将治疗起始时间在癫痫发作和/或意识障碍发作后分为T1(6 - 12小时)、T2(12 - 24小时)、T3(24 - 48小时)和T4(>48小时)进行操作性分类。本综述纳入了30篇文章;未找到随机对照研究。11项回顾性/历史性队列研究和5项病例对照研究包括有或无特定疗法或结果的对照组。各研究的目标病症和治疗时机差异很大。然而,多项研究表明以下三点可能有效:(1)在热性惊厥/意识障碍延长发作且无多器官功能衰竭的12小时内(T1)进行仔细的癫痫管理和目标体温管理,可能会减少伴有双相癫痫发作和晚期扩散受限的急性脑病的发生;(2)在急性坏死性脑病发作24小时内(T1 - T2)使用皮质类固醇、托珠单抗或血浆置换进行免疫治疗,可能会减少后遗症;(3)阿那白滞素治疗和生酮饮食虽几乎没有证据表明能减少神经后遗症,但可能会降低癫痫发作频率并允许撤掉巴比妥类药物,即使在热性感染相关性癫痫综合征儿童发作数周后(T4)给药。尽管现有研究在感染引发的脑病综合征/急性脑病治疗方面没有确凿证据,但本范围综述为未来的前瞻性临床试验奠定了基础。