• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经阴道NOTES 途径与传统腹腔镜比较评估良性附件手术后女性的生活质量:一项随机对照试验方案。

Assessment of women's sexual quality of life after benign adnexal surgery using vNOTES approach in comparison to conventional laparoscopy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Human medicine, University of Geneva Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland

Division of Gynecology, Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 7;13(9):e073691. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073691.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073691
PMID:37678943
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10496722/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) has already proven its non-inferiority to conventional abdominal laparoscopy (CAL) for hysterectomy without conversion. The results in terms of efficacy and safety are promising. However, we note a lack of medical literature and no specific randomised controlled trial assessing women's sexual function after vNOTES for benign adnexal surgery. The aim of this RCT is to confirm the non-inferiority of the vNOTES approach for benign adnexal pathology compared with CAL on women's sexual function. Secondary outcomes will evaluate vNOTES's efficiency, morbidity and postoperative complications compared with CAL for benign adnexal surgery. The relationship between adnexal mass morcellation and the quality of the histological analysis will also be evaluated as secondary outcome.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Women aged 18-70 years undergoing a benign adnexal surgery at the Geneva University Hospitals will be eligible and randomised with a 1:1 ratio to the CAL arm or the vNOTES arm, if inclusion criteria are met. Participants will complete the Female Sexual Function Index, the Couple Satisfaction Index-16 and a self-reported questionnaire on dyspareunia within 4 weeks prior to randomisation and at 3+6 months after surgery. General and clinical data will be collected when the patient is enrolled in the study, during hospitalisation and at 1 month postoperative to assess secondary outcomes.An absence of impairment on sexual function will be confirmed with a stability or an improvement of the evaluated scores in each group at 3 and 6 months postoperative compared with the preoperative scores. We expect to have no statistically significant difference in sexuality questionnaires scores between the two groups.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Protocol of this study was validated by the Cantonal Research Ethics Commission of Geneva, Switzerland, on 9 August 2022. We aim to publish the study's results in peer-reviewed journals within 3 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05761275.

摘要

介绍

经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)已被证明在不转为剖腹手术的情况下,在子宫切除术中与传统的腹腔镜(CAL)相比具有非劣效性。在疗效和安全性方面的结果很有前景。然而,我们注意到缺乏医学文献,也没有专门的随机对照试验评估良性附件手术后 vNOTES 对女性性功能的影响。本 RCT 的目的是确认 vNOTES 方法在良性附件病变方面与 CAL 相比对女性性功能的非劣效性。次要结局将评估 vNOTES 在良性附件手术中与 CAL 相比的效率、发病率和术后并发症。附件肿块粉碎与组织学分析质量之间的关系也将作为次要结局进行评估。

方法和分析

年龄在 18-70 岁之间,在日内瓦大学医院接受良性附件手术的妇女将符合条件并按 1:1 的比例随机分为 CAL 组或 vNOTES 组,如果符合纳入标准。参与者将在随机分组前 4 周内和手术后 3+6 个月内完成女性性功能指数、夫妇满意度指数-16 和关于性交困难的自我报告问卷。在患者入组时、住院期间和术后 1 个月收集一般和临床数据,以评估次要结局。在术后 3 和 6 个月时,与术前评分相比,每个组的评估评分保持稳定或改善,将确认性功能没有受损。我们预计两组之间在性问卷调查评分方面没有统计学上的显著差异。

伦理和传播

本研究方案于 2022 年 8 月 9 日由瑞士日内瓦州研究伦理委员会批准。我们的目标是在 3 年内将研究结果发表在同行评议的期刊上。

试验注册号

NCT05761275。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb48/10496722/82bebfbc1fde/bmjopen-2023-073691f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb48/10496722/6a156c7a1a86/bmjopen-2023-073691f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb48/10496722/82bebfbc1fde/bmjopen-2023-073691f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb48/10496722/6a156c7a1a86/bmjopen-2023-073691f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb48/10496722/82bebfbc1fde/bmjopen-2023-073691f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of women's sexual quality of life after benign adnexal surgery using vNOTES approach in comparison to conventional laparoscopy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.经阴道NOTES 途径与传统腹腔镜比较评估良性附件手术后女性的生活质量:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 7;13(9):e073691. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073691.
2
Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) adnexectomy for benign pathology compared with laparoscopic excision (NOTABLE): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)与腹腔镜切除术治疗良性病变附件切除术的比较(NOTABLE):一项随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 10;8(1):e018059. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018059.
3
VaNoLaH trial: a study protocol-a multinational randomised controlled trial including two identical substudies comparing vaginal versus vNOTES (vaginal natural orifice transluminal surgery) hysterectomy or laparoscopic versus vNOTES hysterectomy.VaNoLaH试验:一项研究方案——一项多国随机对照试验,包括两项相同的子研究,比较经阴道与经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)子宫切除术,以及腹腔镜与vNOTES子宫切除术。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 23;14(4):e081979. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081979.
4
Sexual quality of life and postoperative deep dyspareunia after vNOTES benign adnexal procedures.经 vNOTES 良性附件手术后的性生活质量和术后深部性交痛。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Aug;166(2):699-706. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15455. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
5
Implementing the transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) "first" strategy in benign gynecological surgeries.在良性妇科手术中实施经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)“优先”策略。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Apr;307(4):1007-1013. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06859-9. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
6
Adnexectomy by vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery versus laparoscopy: results of a first randomised controlled trial (NOTABLE trial).经阴道自然腔道内镜手术与腹腔镜附件切除术的比较:一项首次随机对照试验(NOTABLE 试验)的结果。
BJOG. 2021 Oct;128(11):1782-1791. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16838. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
7
Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopy as a day-care procedure: a randomised controlled trial.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术与腹腔镜作为日间手术行子宫切除术的随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2019 Jan;126(1):105-113. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15504.
8
Comparing the efficacy and safety of three surgical approaches for total hysterectomy (TSATH): protocol for a multicentre, single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial.比较三种全子宫切除术手术方法(TSATH)的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、单盲、平行组、随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 10;14(1):e074478. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074478.
9
Does transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery affect female sexual function?: a prospective cohort study.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术是否会影响女性性功能?一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Aug 2;23(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02566-y.
10
HALON-hysterectomy by transabdominal laparoscopy or natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a randomised controlled trial (study protocol).经腹腹腔镜或经自然腔道内镜手术行全子宫切除术:一项随机对照试验(研究方案)
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 12;6(8):e011546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011546.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of feasibility, effectiveness and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(vNOTES) of ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective study.异位妊娠经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)的可行性、有效性及安全性分析:一项回顾性研究
BMC Surg. 2025 Jan 29;25(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02740-5.
2
Systematic review and meta-analysis of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery vs laparoscopic hysterectomy.阴道自然腔道内镜手术与腹腔镜子宫切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Feb 8;4(1):100320. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100320. eCollection 2024 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Adnexectomy by vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery versus laparoscopy: results of a first randomised controlled trial (NOTABLE trial).经阴道自然腔道内镜手术与腹腔镜附件切除术的比较:一项首次随机对照试验(NOTABLE 试验)的结果。
BJOG. 2021 Oct;128(11):1782-1791. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16838. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
2
Conventional Laparoscopy or Vaginally Assisted Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Adnexal Pathologies: A Paired Sample Cross-Sectional Study.传统腹腔镜或经阴道辅助自然腔道内镜手术治疗附件病变:配对样本横断面研究。
J Invest Surg. 2021 Nov;34(11):1185-1190. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1789246. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
3
Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopy as a day-care procedure: a randomised controlled trial.
经阴道自然腔道内镜手术与腹腔镜作为日间手术行子宫切除术的随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2019 Jan;126(1):105-113. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15504.
4
Functional outcomes of nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep infiltrating endometriosis: a prospective analysis using validated questionnaires.保留神经的腹腔镜根治深部浸润型子宫内膜异位症的功能结局:一项使用经过验证的问卷的前瞻性分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Sep;298(3):639-647. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4852-z. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
5
Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a new approach to ovarian cystectomy.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术:卵巢囊肿切除术的新方法。
Fertil Steril. 2018 Feb;109(2):366. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.037. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
6
Transvaginal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic adnexectomy (TVEA vs. CLA): A propensity-matched study and literature review.经阴道内镜手术辅助与传统腹腔镜附件切除术(经阴道内镜辅助附件切除术与传统腹腔镜附件切除术对比研究):一项倾向评分匹配研究及文献综述
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;56(3):336-341. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.04.013.
7
Transvaginal specimen removal in minimally invasive surgery.微创手术中的经阴道标本取出术。
World J Urol. 2016 Jun;34(6):779-87. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1770-1. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
8
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (NAOC vs. LOC): a case-matched study.经自然腔道内镜手术辅助与腹腔镜卵巢囊肿切除术(NAOC与LOC):一项病例匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1227-34. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4315-6. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
9
Influences of different hysterectomy techniques on patients' postoperative sexual function and quality of life.不同子宫切除术式对患者术后性功能及生活质量的影响。
J Sex Med. 2014 Sep;11(9):2342-50. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12623. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
10
Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for adnexal masses.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术治疗附件肿物
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013 Dec;39(12):1604-9. doi: 10.1111/jog.12108. Epub 2013 Jul 22.