• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鉴定旧石器时代桦树焦油生产技术:实验生物分子方法面临的挑战。

Identifying Palaeolithic birch tar production techniques: challenges from an experimental biomolecular approach.

机构信息

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2628CD, The Netherlands.

Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2629HZ, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 7;13(1):14727. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41898-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-41898-5
PMID:37679507
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10485052/
Abstract

The intentional production of birch bark tar by European Neanderthals as early as 190,000 years ago plays an important role in discussions about the technological and behavioural complexity of Pleistocene hominins. However, research is hampered because it is currently unknown how Neanderthals were producing birch tar. There are several different techniques that could have been employed, but these differ in their apparent production complexity, time and resource efficiency. Identifying production processes in the archaeological record is therefore paramount for furthering research on the technical behavioural repertoire. Organic biomarkers, identified with Gas Chromatograph-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS), have been used to identify possible production processes during the Neolithic. Here we test whether these biomarkers can also distinguish Palaeolithic (aceramic) tar production methods. We produced tar using five different methods and analysed their biomolecular composition with GC-MS. Our results show that the biomarkers used to distinguish Neolithic tar production strategies using ceramic technology cannot be reliably used to identify tar production processes using aceramic Palaeolithic techniques. More experimentation is required to produce a larger reference library of different tars for future comparisons. To achieve this, complete GC-MS datasets must also be made publicly available, as we have done with our data.

摘要

欧洲尼安德特人早在 19 万年前就有意生产桦树皮焦油,这在讨论更新世人类的技术和行为复杂性方面发挥了重要作用。然而,由于目前尚不清楚尼安德特人是如何生产桦焦油的,因此研究受到了阻碍。有几种不同的技术可能已经被使用,但这些技术在明显的生产复杂性、时间和资源效率上有所不同。因此,在考古记录中识别生产工艺对于进一步研究技术行为能力至关重要。通过气相色谱-质谱联用仪(GC-MS)鉴定出的有机生物标志物已被用于鉴定新石器时代可能的生产工艺。在这里,我们测试了这些生物标志物是否也可以区分旧石器时代(无陶器)焦油的生产方法。我们使用五种不同的方法生产焦油,并使用 GC-MS 分析它们的生物分子组成。我们的结果表明,用于区分使用陶瓷技术的新石器时代焦油生产策略的生物标志物不能可靠地用于识别使用无陶器的旧石器时代技术的焦油生产过程。需要进行更多的实验来为未来的比较生成一个更大的不同焦油的参考库。为此,我们必须像我们所做的那样,公开提供完整的 GC-MS 数据集。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af8c/10485052/47cb27da3417/41598_2023_41898_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af8c/10485052/169e5a32a8e4/41598_2023_41898_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af8c/10485052/1e74f0e75fef/41598_2023_41898_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af8c/10485052/95c2dac26b08/41598_2023_41898_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af8c/10485052/b3ed7b1afc6e/41598_2023_41898_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af8c/10485052/47cb27da3417/41598_2023_41898_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af8c/10485052/169e5a32a8e4/41598_2023_41898_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af8c/10485052/1e74f0e75fef/41598_2023_41898_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af8c/10485052/95c2dac26b08/41598_2023_41898_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af8c/10485052/b3ed7b1afc6e/41598_2023_41898_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af8c/10485052/47cb27da3417/41598_2023_41898_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying Palaeolithic birch tar production techniques: challenges from an experimental biomolecular approach.鉴定旧石器时代桦树焦油生产技术:实验生物分子方法面临的挑战。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 7;13(1):14727. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41898-5.
2
Experimental methods for the Palaeolithic dry distillation of birch bark: implications for the origin and development of Neandertal adhesive technology.旧石器时代桦树皮干馏的实验方法:对尼安德特人黏合技术起源和发展的启示。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 31;7(1):8033. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08106-7.
3
Scaling Palaeolithic tar production processes exponentially increases behavioural complexity.大规模复制旧石器时代焦油制作工艺会使行为复杂度呈指数级增长。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 7;13(1):14709. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41963-z.
4
Birch tar production does not prove Neanderthal behavioral complexity.桦焦油的生产并不能证明尼安德特人的行为复杂性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Sep 3;116(36):17707-17711. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911137116. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
5
Molecular characterisation of birch bark tar by headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: a new way for identifying archaeological glues.顶空固相微萃取气相色谱 - 质谱联用对桦树皮焦油的分子表征:一种鉴定考古胶水的新方法
J Chromatogr A. 2006 Jan 6;1101(1-2):245-53. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.09.070. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
6
A new method for birch tar making with materials available in the Stone Age.一种利用石器时代可用材料制作桦焦油的新方法。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):413. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04161-3.
7
Production method of the Königsaue birch tar documents cumulative culture in Neanderthals.柯尼希绍桦木焦油的生产方法证明了尼安德特人的累积文化。
Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 2023;15(6):84. doi: 10.1007/s12520-023-01789-2. Epub 2023 May 22.
8
Birch bark tar in early Medieval England - Continuity of tradition or technological revival?中世纪早期英格兰的桦树皮焦油——传统的延续还是技术的复兴?
J Archaeol Sci Rep. 2020 Feb;29:102118. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.102118.
9
Differences in birch tar composition are explained by adhesive function in the central European Iron Age.中欧铁器时代黏附功能解释了桦焦油成分的差异。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 3;19(4):e0301103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301103. eCollection 2024.
10
The Zandmotor data do not resolve the question whether Middle Paleolithic birch tar making was complex or not.赞德莫托的数据并未解决旧石器时代中期桦树皮焦油制作是否复杂这一问题。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 3;117(9):4456-4457. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919564117. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Direct evidence for processing Isatis tinctoria L., a non-nutritional plant, 32-34,000 years ago.32000至34000年前加工菘蓝(一种非食用植物)的直接证据。
PLoS One. 2025 May 9;20(5):e0321262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321262. eCollection 2025.
2
First evidence of early neolithic archery from Cueva de los Murciélagos (Albuñol, Granada) revealed through combined chemical and morphological analysis.通过化学和形态学分析相结合揭示了来自穆尔西埃拉戈斯洞穴(阿尔布尼奥尔,格拉纳达)的新石器时代早期射箭的首个证据。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 5;14(1):29247. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77224-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Production method of the Königsaue birch tar documents cumulative culture in Neanderthals.柯尼希绍桦木焦油的生产方法证明了尼安德特人的累积文化。
Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 2023;15(6):84. doi: 10.1007/s12520-023-01789-2. Epub 2023 May 22.
2
Archaeological tar supports the cognitive complexity of Neanderthals.考古焦油支持尼安德特人的认知复杂性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Feb 14;120(7):e2221676120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2221676120. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
3
Laboratory-based experimental research into the effect of diagenesis on heated bone: implications and improved tools for the characterisation of ancient fire.
基于实验室的成岩作用对加热骨骼影响的实验研究:对古代火特征分析的启示和改进工具。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 2;12(1):17544. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21622-5.
4
Archaeological adhesives made from document innovative potential in the African Middle Stone Age.从考古胶水中发现的文献揭示了非洲中石器时代的创新潜力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 4;119(40):e2209592119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2209592119. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
5
Chemical Modification of Biomarkers through Accelerated Degradation: Implications for Ancient Plant Identification in Archaeo-Organic Residues.通过加速降解对生物标志物进行化学修饰:对考古有机残留物中古代植物鉴定的影响。
Molecules. 2022 May 22;27(10):3331. doi: 10.3390/molecules27103331.
6
A new method for birch tar making with materials available in the Stone Age.一种利用石器时代可用材料制作桦焦油的新方法。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):413. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04161-3.
7
Reply to Schmidt et al.: Interpretation of Paleolithic adhesive production: Combining experimental and paleoenvironmental information.对施密特等人的回复:旧石器时代粘合剂生产的解读:结合实验与古环境信息
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 3;117(9):4458-4459. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920933117. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
8
A new experimental methodology for assessing adhesive properties shows that Neandertals used the most suitable material available.一种新的评估黏附性能的实验方法表明,尼安德特人使用了最适合的材料。
J Hum Evol. 2019 Dec;137:102664. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.102664. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
9
Tar adhesives, Neandertals, and the tyranny of the discontinuous mind.焦油粘合剂、尼安德特人以及间断性思维的专制
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 29;116(44):21966-21968. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916116116. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
10
Middle Paleolithic complex technology and a Neandertal tar-backed tool from the Dutch North Sea.中更新世复合技术与来自荷兰北海的尼安德特人焦油背衬工具。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 29;116(44):22081-22087. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907828116. Epub 2019 Oct 21.