Bard Jason T, Yeluru Hemasree, Karpov Matvey V, Mu David
Research, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, USA.
Cureus. 2023 Aug 7;15(8):e43067. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43067. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Introduction The United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 change to Pass/Fail scoring has motivated medical students to pursue more research opportunities. To support students, a student-led organization was created at an allopathic medical school, offering initiatives such as workshops, mentorship, and research projects. Here, we evaluate its impact on medical student research. Methods An observational survey study was conducted to assess students' research involvement and productivity and their sense of support, confidence, and comfort in pursuing research at an institution during the first two years of medical school. These variables were compared between three contiguous classes of students and between club members and non-members. Analyses included t-tests, Chi-square tests, and ANOVA, among others. Results Findings revealed that organization membership was associated with an increased number of research projects. Club members (= 4.49) reported a significantly greater number of projects compared to non-members (= 4.49) (= 0.002). Students who had access to the organization during their preclinical years (= 4.38) reported significantly more projects compared to students whose preclinical years were before the organization's conception (= 2.21) (= 0.041). However, research productivity and feelings of support and confidence in research did not differ by class or club membership. Conclusions Club members engaged in a greater number of research projects as compared to non-members and students who had access to the organization during their preclinical years. The implementation of similar organizations at every medical school can allow more students to engage in scholarly work.
引言 美国医师执照考试第一步改为通过/不及格计分制,这促使医学生寻求更多研究机会。为了支持学生,一所全科医学院成立了一个由学生主导的组织,提供诸如研讨会、指导和研究项目等活动。在此,我们评估其对医学生研究的影响。
方法 进行了一项观察性调查研究,以评估学生在医学院前两年在某机构的研究参与度和产出,以及他们在从事研究时的支持感、信心和舒适度。在连续的三个班级的学生之间以及俱乐部成员和非成员之间比较这些变量。分析包括t检验、卡方检验和方差分析等。
结果 研究结果显示,组织成员身份与研究项目数量的增加有关。俱乐部成员(=4.49)报告的项目数量明显多于非成员(=4.49)(=0.002)。在临床前阶段能够接触到该组织的学生(=4.38)报告的项目明显多于临床前阶段在该组织成立之前的学生(=2.21)(=0.041)。然而,研究产出以及对研究的支持感和信心在不同班级或俱乐部成员身份之间没有差异。
结论 与非成员以及临床前阶段能够接触到该组织的学生相比,俱乐部成员参与的研究项目更多。在每所医学院实施类似的组织可以让更多学生参与学术工作。