• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

右啡烷、右美沙芬和苯环利定的镇咳效果比较

Comparative antitussive effects of dextrorphan, dextromethorphan and phencyclidine.

作者信息

Lal J, Krutak-Krol H, Domino E F

出版信息

Arzneimittelforschung. 1986 Jul;36(7):1075-8.

PMID:3768075
Abstract

The possible antitussive effects of dextrorphan (the (+) isomer of levorphanol) and phencyclidine (PCP) were compared to well known antitussive properties of dextromethorphan in the post-halothane anesthetized decerebrate cat in which cough was elicited by direct electrical stimulation of the cough center. Dextrorphan, when injected i.a. (0.05-0.32 mg kg-1) or i.v. (1 to 3 mg kg-1), PCP i.a. (0.1-0.32 mg kg-1) or i.v. (1.0 mg kg-1) had no effect on electrically elicited cough. After i.v. administration, dextrorphan caused a variable effect on respiration but did not have any respiratory effect with i.a. administration of the drug. PCP injection i.a. at 0.32 mg kg-1 severely inhibited respiration though coughing could still be elicited. But i.v. administration of 1.0 mg/kg-1 suppressed both cough and respiration for several hours. Dextromethorphan inhibited cough upon both i.a. and i.v. injection. The mean effective i.a. dose was 0.063 mg kg-1. A ten times higher dose was necessary (0.65 mg kg-1) for cough suppression by the i.v. route. It is concluded from the i.a./i.v. ratio that dextromethorphan has specific central antitussive activity not possessed by dextrorphan and PCP.

摘要

在氟烷麻醉后的去大脑猫中,通过直接电刺激咳嗽中枢引发咳嗽,比较了右啡烷(左啡诺的(+)异构体)和苯环己哌啶(PCP)可能的镇咳作用与右美沙芬已知的镇咳特性。右啡烷腹腔注射(0.05 - 0.32毫克/千克)或静脉注射(1至3毫克/千克)、PCP腹腔注射(0.1 - 0.32毫克/千克)或静脉注射(1.0毫克/千克)对电诱发的咳嗽均无影响。静脉给药后,右啡烷对呼吸有不同影响,但腹腔给药时对呼吸无任何影响。腹腔注射0.32毫克/千克的PCP虽仍能诱发咳嗽,但严重抑制呼吸。而静脉注射1.0毫克/千克则会在数小时内同时抑制咳嗽和呼吸。右美沙芬腹腔注射和静脉注射均能抑制咳嗽。腹腔注射的平均有效剂量为0.063毫克/千克。通过静脉途径抑制咳嗽则需要高十倍的剂量(0.65毫克/千克)。从腹腔注射/静脉注射的剂量比得出结论,右美沙芬具有右啡烷和PCP所不具备的特异性中枢镇咳活性。

相似文献

1
Comparative antitussive effects of dextrorphan, dextromethorphan and phencyclidine.右啡烷、右美沙芬和苯环利定的镇咳效果比较
Arzneimittelforschung. 1986 Jul;36(7):1075-8.
2
Evidence for a central site of action for the antitussive effects of caramiphen.卡拉美芬镇咳作用的中枢作用位点证据。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1985 Apr;233(1):249-53.
3
Dextrorphan and dextromethorphan: comparative antitussive effects on guinea pigs.右啡烷和右美沙芬:对豚鼠的镇咳作用比较
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1994;20(5):199-203.
4
Anticonvulsant effects of dextrorphan in rats: possible involvement in dextromethorphan-induced seizure protection.右啡烷对大鼠的抗惊厥作用:可能与右美沙芬诱导的癫痫保护作用有关。
Life Sci. 1988;42(24):2509-14. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(88)90350-5.
5
Dextromethorphan and codeine: comparison of plasma kinetics and antitussive effects.右美沙芬与可待因:血浆动力学及镇咳效果比较
Eur J Respir Dis. 1984 May;65(4):283-91.
6
Pharmacological profile of dextrorphan.右啡烷的药理学特性
Arzneimittelforschung. 1995 Nov;45(11):1188-93.
7
Binding of dimemorfan to sigma-1 receptor and its anticonvulsant and locomotor effects in mice, compared with dextromethorphan and dextrorphan.与右美沙芬和右啡烷相比,二甲吗啡对小鼠σ-1受体的亲和力及其抗惊厥和运动效应。
Brain Res. 1999 Mar 13;821(2):516-9. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01125-7.
8
Studies on the localization of central cough mechanism; site of action of antitussive drugs.中枢性咳嗽机制的定位研究;镇咳药物的作用部位。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1975 Sep;194(3):499-505.
9
[Effects of antitussive drugs on the central respiratory mechanisms during the cough reflex].[镇咳药对咳嗽反射期间中枢呼吸机制的影响]
Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi. 1982 Nov;80(5):367-74.
10
Dextrorphan and dextromethorphan attenuate hypoxic injury in neuronal culture.右啡烷和右美沙芬可减轻神经元培养中的缺氧损伤。
Neurosci Lett. 1987 Sep 11;80(1):11-5. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(87)90486-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Central mechanisms II: pharmacology of brainstem pathways.中枢机制II:脑干通路的药理学
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009(187):203-17. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-79842-2_10.