Suppr超能文献

有和没有集成气道的完全鼻腔填塞的比较。

Comparison of complete nasal packing with and without integrated airways.

作者信息

Jamil Afifa, Hameed Hira Abdul, Sidiqqui Atif Hafeez, Farrukh M Shuja

机构信息

Afifa Jamil, MBBS. ENT Unit-1, Dr Ruth K.M. PFAU, Civil Hospital, DUHS, Karachi, Pakistan.

Hira Abdul Hameed, DLO, RMO. ENT Unit-1, Dr Ruth K.M. PFAU, Civil Hospital, DUHS, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Sep-Oct;39(5):1317-1320. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.5.7478.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of nasal packing using a Nasopore nasal packing with and without an airway tube on postoperative pain, SpO, nasal obstruction, and difficulty in breathing complaints.

METHODS

This comparative study was conducted at Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), DMC Civil Hospital Karachi between September 18, 2021, to May 19, 2022. A total of 70 patients who underwent septoplasty for septal deviation and chronic hypertrophic rhinitis were equally divided into two groups. Group-A patients received nasal packing using a Nasopore nasal packing with an airway tube, and Group-B patients received nasal packing using a Nasopore nasal packing without an airway tube. Post-operation Nasal pain sensations were measured using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale at 2 and 12 hours. SpO was measured at 30 minutes pre-operatively with an O saturation monitor and 12 hours post-operatively during sleep.

RESULTS

The postoperative pain at two hours and 12 hours was compared between the two groups, and a significant difference was observed. In Group-A, the average SpO decreased > 4% from baseline in 5.7% patients, and 37% in Group-B. A significant difference was observed in the severity of nasal obstruction and difficulty breathing, P-value < 0.05.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that septoplasty followed by applying nasal packing with integrated airway reduces postoperative pain and improves oxygen saturation compared to nasal packing without integrated airways.

摘要

目的

比较使用带气道管的鼻宝鼻腔填塞物和不带气道管的鼻宝鼻腔填塞物进行鼻腔填塞对术后疼痛、血氧饱和度(SpO)、鼻塞及呼吸困难主诉的影响。

方法

本比较研究于2021年9月18日至2022年5月19日在卡拉奇市DMC公民医院的道健康科学大学(DUHS)进行。共有70例因鼻中隔偏曲和慢性肥厚性鼻炎接受鼻中隔成形术的患者被平均分为两组。A组患者使用带气道管的鼻宝鼻腔填塞物进行鼻腔填塞,B组患者使用不带气道管的鼻宝鼻腔填塞物进行鼻腔填塞。术后分别在2小时和12小时使用面部表情疼痛评分量表(Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale)测量鼻部疼痛感觉。术前30分钟使用血氧饱和度监测仪测量SpO,术后睡眠期间12小时测量SpO。

结果

比较两组术后2小时和12小时的疼痛情况,观察到显著差异。A组中,5.7%的患者平均SpO较基线下降>4%,B组为37%。在鼻塞和呼吸困难的严重程度方面观察到显著差异,P值<0.05。

结论

得出结论,与未整合气道的鼻腔填塞相比,鼻中隔成形术后应用整合气道的鼻腔填塞可减轻术后疼痛并提高血氧饱和度。

相似文献

6
Trans-septal Suturing Versus Merocel Nasal Packing: A Post Septoplasty Comparison.经鼻中隔缝合术与美罗赛鼻腔填塞术:鼻中隔成形术后的比较
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):937-942. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-02013-6. Epub 2020 Aug 3.

本文引用的文献

7
Comparison of nasal packs with transseptal suturing after nasal septal surgery.鼻中隔手术后鼻腔填塞与鼻中隔缝合的比较。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2013 Jul-Aug;34(4):308-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.12.012. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验