Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine MacKay Memorial Hospital Taipei Taiwan.
Department of Medicine MacKay Medical College New Taipei Taiwan.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Sep 19;12(18):e028860. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028860. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
Background The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (LCZ696) has emerged as a promising pharmacological intervention against renin-angiotensin system inhibitor in reduced ejection fraction heart failure (HFrEF). Whether the therapeutic benefits may vary among heterogeneous HFrEF subgroups remains unknown. Methods and Results This study comprised a pooled 2-center analysis including 1103 patients with symptomatic HFrEF with LCZ696 use and another 1103 independent HFrEF control cohort (with renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use) matched for age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, and comorbidity conditions. Three main distinct phenogroup clusterings were identified from unsupervised machine learning using 29 clinical variables: phenogroup 1 (youngest, relatively lower diabetes prevalence, highest glomerular filtration rate with largest left ventricular size and left ventricular wall stress); phenogroup 2 (oldest, lean, highest diabetes and vascular diseases prevalence, lowest highest glomerular filtration rate with smallest left ventricular size and mass), and phenogroup 3 (lowest clinical comorbidity with largest left ventricular mass and highest hypertrophy prevalence). During the median 1.74-year follow-up, phenogroup assignment provided improved prognostic discrimination beyond Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure risk score risk score (all net reclassification index <0.05) with overall good calibrations. While phenogroup 1 showed overall best clinical outcomes, phenogroup 2 demonstrated highest cardiovascular death and worst renal end point, with phenogroup 3 having the highest all-cause death rate and HF hospitalization among groups, respectively. These findings were broadly consistent when compared with the renin-angiotensin system inhibitor control as reference group. Conclusions Phenomapping provided novel insights on unique characteristics and cardiac features among patients with HFrEF with sacubitril/valsartan treatment. These findings further showed potentiality in identifying potential sacubitril/valsartan responders and nonresponders with improved outcome discrimination among patients with HFrEF beyond clinical scoring.
血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂(LCZ696)作为肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂在射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)中的一种有前途的药物干预手段已经出现。但治疗益处是否在不同的 HFrEF 亚组中存在差异尚不清楚。
本研究包括一项来自 2 个中心的汇总分析,纳入了 1103 例使用 LCZ696 的有症状 HFrEF 患者和另外 1103 例独立的 HFrEF 对照队列(使用肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂),两组在年龄、性别、左心室射血分数和合并症方面匹配。使用 29 个临床变量,通过无监督机器学习方法识别出 3 个主要的不同表型聚类:表型 1(最年轻,糖尿病患病率相对较低,肾小球滤过率最高,左心室最大,左心室壁应力最大);表型 2(最年长,消瘦,糖尿病和血管疾病患病率最高,肾小球滤过率最低,左心室最小,左心室质量和体积最小)和表型 3(临床合并症最低,左心室质量最大,肥大患病率最高)。在中位数为 1.74 年的随访期间,表型分组在 Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure 风险评分(所有净重新分类指数均<0.05)之外提供了更好的预后判别能力,总体校准良好。虽然表型 1 总体预后最佳,但表型 2 心血管死亡风险最高,肾脏终点最差,而表型 3 则是各组中全因死亡率和 HF 住院率最高。与以肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂为对照的结果相比,这些发现基本一致。
表型映射为使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗的 HFrEF 患者提供了独特特征和心脏特征的新见解。这些发现进一步表明,在临床评分之外,通过识别潜在的沙库巴曲缬沙坦反应者和非反应者,可以提高 HFrEF 患者的预后判别能力。