Department of Environmental and Occupational Health and Justice, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
College of Public Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Institute Building 3 (10th-11th Floor), Chulalongkorn soi 62, Phyathai Rd., Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 24;20(17):6635. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20176635.
Although exposure to chemical pesticides is known to cause negative effects on human health, farmers in Ban Luang, Nan, Thailand, continue to use them regularly to protect crops. This study focused on mothers who were engaged in farm tasks and had children between the ages of 0 to 72 months, with the objective of reducing pesticide exposure.
This study was conducted from May 2020 to October 2020 in the Ban Fa and Ban Phi sub-districts in Ban Luang due to the high use of pesticides in these areas. A systematic random sampling technique was used to recruit 78 mothers exposed to pesticides. Thirty-nine mothers from Ban Fa district were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 39 from Ban Phi to the control group over a 3-month period. This study applied a pesticide behavioral change training program for the intervention group. To assess the effectiveness of the program, the study compared the results of a questionnaire regarding knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) and health beliefs related to pesticide exposure as well as the levels of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyryl cholinesterase (BChE) enzymes, biomarkers of exposure to pesticides, before and after the intervention using ANCOVA statistical test. Furthermore, to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention program, a paired -test was used to investigate the in-home pesticide safety assessment.
After the intervention, we observed no significant change in AChE; however, a significant improvement in BChE ( < 0.05), a marker of short-term recovery, was observed. Pesticides can cause a reduction in AChE and BChE, however, after eliminating pesticides, BChE takes a shorter time (about 30-50 days) to recover than AChE (around 90-120 days). Therefore, increases in the measured concentrations of AChE and/or BChE suggest the presence of less chemicals from pesticides in the human body. The study also found a significant improvement in KAP and beliefs about chemical pesticide exposure after the intervention ( < 0.05). Furthermore, using a paired -test, we found a significant increase in pesticide safety practices ( < 0.05) in the intervention group and a borderline significant increase regarding in-home safety ( = 0.051) in the control group.
Based on the results, the constructs of the intervention program were effective and could be applied in other agricultural areas in less developed countries. However, due to time limitations during the COVID-19 pandemic, further studies should be conducted to enable data collection over a longer time, with a larger number of subjects providing the ChE levels for the non-agricultural season.
尽管已知接触化学农药会对人类健康造成负面影响,但泰国楠府班廊的农民仍继续定期使用它们来保护作物。本研究聚焦于从事农场工作且其孩子年龄在 0 至 72 个月之间的母亲,目的是减少农药暴露。
本研究于 2020 年 5 月至 10 月在班廊的班法和班披分区进行,因为这些地区大量使用农药。采用系统随机抽样技术招募了 78 名接触农药的母亲。来自班法区的 39 名母亲被随机分配到干预组,来自班披的 39 名母亲被分配到对照组,为期 3 个月。本研究对干预组应用了农药行为改变培训计划。为了评估该计划的效果,我们比较了干预前后问卷中有关知识、态度和实践(KAP)以及与农药暴露相关的健康信念以及乙酰胆碱酯酶(AChE)和丁酰胆碱酯酶(BChE)水平的结果,采用协方差分析(ANCOVA)统计检验。此外,为了评估干预计划的效果,采用配对检验调查了家庭内农药安全评估。
干预后,我们观察到 AChE 没有显著变化;然而,观察到短期恢复标志物 BChE(<0.05)显著改善。农药会导致 AChE 和 BChE 减少,但是,消除农药后,BChE 恢复所需的时间(约 30-50 天)比 AChE(约 90-120 天)短。因此,AChE 和/或 BChE 测量浓度的增加表明人体内化学农药的含量减少。研究还发现,干预后 KAP 和对化学农药暴露的信念有显著改善(<0.05)。此外,采用配对检验,我们发现干预组的农药安全实践显著增加(<0.05),对照组家庭内安全略有增加(=0.051)。
根据结果,干预计划的结构是有效的,可以在欠发达地区的其他农业领域应用。但是,由于在 COVID-19 大流行期间时间限制,应进一步进行研究,以便能够在更长时间内收集数据,并增加非农业季节的 ChE 水平的研究对象数量。