• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲泼尼龙还是地塞米松?我们应该如何选择应对 COVID-19?:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Methylprednisolone or dexamethasone? How should we choose to respond to COVID-19?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.

Liuzhou People's Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 8;102(36):e34738. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034738.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000034738
PMID:37682199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10489360/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Methylprednisolone (MP) and dexamethasone (DXM) are commonly prescribed hormone drugs for treating coronavirus pandemic disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, but conflicting results from previous studies and meta-analyses on their efficacy and safety necessitate further investigation. Therefore, in this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to enhance the level of evidence and compare the efficacy and safety of MP and DXM in COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to retrieve randomized clinical trials. Our primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality, with secondary outcomes including admission to the intensive care unit, length of hospital stay, mechanical ventilation, and adverse events.

RESULTS

This study analyzed six randomized controlled trials involving 1403 patients (MP group: 704; DXM group: 699). The results of the analysis showed no significant differences in mortality rates, admission to intensive care units, hospitalization time, mechanical ventilation, or adverse events between the MP and DXM groups (P > .05). However, a significant difference was observed in the incidence of hyperglycemia between these 2 groups (RR = 1.78, 95% CI [1.09, 2.89], P = .02, I2 = 78%).

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis showed that there was no difference in mortality, ICU admission rate, hospital stay, mechanical ventilation, or adverse events between MP and DXM in the treatment of COVID-19. The incidence of hyperglycemia with methylprednisolone was higher than that with dexamethasone.

摘要

背景

甲泼尼龙(MP)和地塞米松(DXM)是治疗 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的常用激素药物,但之前的研究和荟萃分析结果存在矛盾,需要进一步研究。因此,本研究对随机对照试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以提高证据水平,并比较 MP 和 DXM 在 COVID-19 患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们全面检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,以检索随机临床试验。我们的主要结局指标是全因死亡率,次要结局指标包括入住重症监护病房、住院时间、机械通气和不良事件。

结果

本研究分析了六项涉及 1403 例患者的随机对照试验(MP 组:704 例;DXM 组:699 例)。分析结果显示,MP 和 DXM 组之间的死亡率、入住重症监护病房、住院时间、机械通气或不良事件发生率无显著差异(P>.05)。然而,两组之间的高血糖发生率存在显著差异(RR=1.78,95%CI[1.09,2.89],P=0.02,I2=78%)。

结论

本荟萃分析结果表明,在 COVID-19 的治疗中,MP 和 DXM 之间在死亡率、ICU 入院率、住院时间、机械通气或不良事件方面没有差异。甲泼尼龙引起高血糖的发生率高于地塞米松。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/a5ad6f20e77d/medi-102-e34738-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/cfe79139e7aa/medi-102-e34738-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/3dd25313a4c1/medi-102-e34738-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/e6ac66eb029b/medi-102-e34738-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/ed7a9822557a/medi-102-e34738-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/690dac5e4957/medi-102-e34738-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/1f95504b36ac/medi-102-e34738-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/8b4895a79cd3/medi-102-e34738-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/d908406157f3/medi-102-e34738-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/59385032fe7a/medi-102-e34738-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/a5ad6f20e77d/medi-102-e34738-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/cfe79139e7aa/medi-102-e34738-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/3dd25313a4c1/medi-102-e34738-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/e6ac66eb029b/medi-102-e34738-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/ed7a9822557a/medi-102-e34738-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/690dac5e4957/medi-102-e34738-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/1f95504b36ac/medi-102-e34738-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/8b4895a79cd3/medi-102-e34738-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/d908406157f3/medi-102-e34738-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/59385032fe7a/medi-102-e34738-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d5f/10489360/a5ad6f20e77d/medi-102-e34738-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Methylprednisolone or dexamethasone? How should we choose to respond to COVID-19?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.甲泼尼龙还是地塞米松?我们应该如何选择应对 COVID-19?:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 8;102(36):e34738. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034738.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of glucocorticoids treatment in severe COVID-19: methylprednisolone versus dexamethasone.糖皮质激素治疗重症 COVID-19 的系统评价和荟萃分析:甲泼尼龙与地塞米松。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 May 5;23(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08280-2.
3
Systemic corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19: Equity-related analyses and update on evidence.全身性皮质类固醇治疗 COVID-19:与公平相关的分析和证据更新。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD014963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014963.pub2.
4
Efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids use in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and network meta‑analysis.糖皮质激素治疗 COVID-19 患者的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Dec 20;23(1):896. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08874-w.
5
Interventions for treatment of COVID-19: A living systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (The LIVING Project).干预治疗 COVID-19:一项具有荟萃分析和试验序贯分析的实时系统评价(LIVING 项目)。
PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 17;17(9):e1003293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003293. eCollection 2020 Sep.
6
Dexamethasone vs methylprednisolone high dose for Covid-19 pneumonia.地塞米松与甲泼尼龙大剂量治疗新冠肺炎肺炎。
PLoS One. 2021 May 25;16(5):e0252057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252057. eCollection 2021.
7
Association Between Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Meta-analysis.COVID-19 重症患者全身使用皮质类固醇与死亡率的关联:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2020 Oct 6;324(13):1330-1341. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17023.
8
Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID-19.氯喹或羟氯喹预防和治疗 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 12;2(2):CD013587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2.
9
Interventions for treatment of COVID-19: Second edition of a living systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (The LIVING Project).干预治疗 COVID-19:有荟萃分析和试验序贯分析的第二版实时系统评价(LIVING 项目)。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0248132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248132. eCollection 2021.
10
A comparative study between methylprednisolone versus dexamethasone as an initial anti-inflammatory treatment of moderate COVID-19 pneumonia: an open-label randomized controlled trial.甲泼尼龙与地塞米松作为中重度 COVID-19 肺炎初始抗炎治疗的对比研究:一项开放标签随机对照试验。
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Nov 11;24(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03364-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The comparative effectiveness of methylprednisolone versus dexamethasone on in-hospital mortality in patients with severe or critical COVID-19: a retrospective observational study.甲泼尼龙与地塞米松对重症或危重症新型冠状病毒肺炎患者院内死亡率的比较疗效:一项回顾性观察研究
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 22;12:20499361251328824. doi: 10.1177/20499361251328824. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Should the Start of Immunosuppressive Treatment for COVID-19 Rely upon the Degree of Inflammation or the Time from Onset?新冠病毒病免疫抑制治疗的起始应取决于炎症程度还是发病时间?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 27;61(2):233. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020233.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Pulmonary embolism in COVID-19, risk factors and association with inflammatory biomarkers.新型冠状病毒肺炎相关肺血栓栓塞症的危险因素及与炎症生物标志物的关系。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Feb 17;102(7):e32887. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032887.
2
Comparison of the efficacy of equivalent doses of dexamethasone, methylprednisolone, and hydrocortisone for treatment of COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective three-arm randomized clinical trial.比较等效剂量地塞米松、甲泼尼龙和氢化可的松治疗 COVID-19 相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效:一项前瞻性三臂随机临床试验。
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2023 Apr;173(5-6):140-151. doi: 10.1007/s10354-022-00993-4. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
3
Catalase: A Potential Pharmacologic Target for Hydrogen Peroxide in the Treatment of COVID-19.
过氧化氢治疗 COVID-19 中 catalase:一个潜在的药理学靶点。
Curr Top Med Chem. 2024;24(25):2191-2210. doi: 10.2174/0115680266322046240819053909.
Factors associated with improved outcome of inhaled corticosteroid use in COVID-19: A single institutional study.
与 COVID-19 患者吸入性皮质类固醇治疗效果改善相关的因素:一项单机构研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Dec 23;101(51):e32420. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032420.
4
Prolonged higher dose methylprednisolone conventional dexamethasone in COVID-19 pneumonia: a randomised controlled trial (MEDEAS).COVID-19 肺炎中较长时间的高剂量甲泼尼龙与常规地塞米松的随机对照试验(MEDEAS)。
Eur Respir J. 2023 Apr 20;61(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01514-2022. Print 2023 Apr.
5
Effect of intravenous pulses of methylprednisolone 250 mg versus dexamethasone 6 mg in hospitalised adults with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: An open-label randomised trial.静脉注射甲泼尼龙 250mg 与地塞米松 6mg 对住院重症 COVID-19 肺炎患者的影响:一项开放标签随机试验。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2023 Jan;53(1):e13881. doi: 10.1111/eci.13881. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
6
Comparison of the effect of intravenous dexamethasone and methylprednisolone on the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial.静脉注射地塞米松和甲泼尼龙治疗 COVID-19 住院患者的效果比较:一项随机临床试验。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Sep;122:659-664. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.07.019. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
7
High-Dose versus Low-Dose Corticosteroids in COVID-19 Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.大剂量与小剂量皮质类固醇治疗 COVID-19 患者的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Sep;36(9):3576-3586. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.05.011. Epub 2022 May 13.
8
Methylprednisolone Versus Dexamethasone in COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis of Nonrandomized Studies.甲基强的松龙与地塞米松治疗新冠肺炎的疗效比较:非随机研究的荟萃分析
Am J Ther. 2022;29(3):e354-e357. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001506. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
9
Methylprednisolone May Be Superior to Dexamethasone in COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.在新冠疫情中,甲泼尼龙可能优于地塞米松:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Am J Ther. 2022;29(3):e351-e354. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001507. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
10
Intravenous methylprednisolone pulses in hospitalised patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.静脉注射甲基强的松龙脉冲治疗住院严重 COVID-19 肺炎患者:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Eur Respir J. 2022 Oct 20;60(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00025-2022. Print 2022 Oct.