Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 8;18(9):e0291238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291238. eCollection 2023.
Single plate osteosynthesis is commonly employed when performing surgical stabilization of midshaft clavicle fractures. In recent years, a smaller structural low-profile double plating technique has been described as a possible solution for the high removal rates associated with single plating. A previous meta-analysis has demonstrated that low-profile double plating attains the same healing rates as single plating without a higher chance of fracture-related infections. This meta-analysis, however, was based on relatively small studies. Therefore, a multicentre prospective natural experiment was designed using natural variation in treatment regimens and geographical location of the trauma as treatment allocation mechanism to compare both treatments on a larger scale. This manuscript describes its protocol.
MATERIAL & METHODS: Patients (≥16 years) with primary midshaft clavicle fractures that are eligible for operative treatment will be included. Treatment allocation will be determined by the geographical location of the accident and local hospital providing treatment. In two centres, single plating is the treatment of choice for these patients. In two others, low-profile double plating has become the standard treatment. For the low-profile double plating group, one superiorly positioned VariAx 2.0mm and one anterior VariAx 2.4mm or 2.7mm plate will be used. For the single plating group, the standard locally available implant will be used. A total of 336 patients will be included. The primary outcome of interest is re-intervention. Secondary outcomes include complications, operative time, length of incision, functional scores (DASH, EQ-5D-DL, VAS-Pain/Satisfaction) and cost-effectiveness.
This study will determine whether low-profile double plating has significant clinical and cost-effective benefits over single plating techniques in midshaft clavicle fractures. The study will also give insight in the performance of a natural experiment study design for orthopedic trauma research.
This study has been registered on ClincialTrials.gov, identifier NCT05579873.
在进行锁骨中段骨折的手术固定时,通常采用单钢板内固定。近年来,一种较小的结构性低切迹双钢板技术已被描述为解决与单钢板相关的高取出率的可能方法。先前的荟萃分析表明,低切迹双钢板在不增加骨折相关感染风险的情况下,达到与单钢板相同的愈合率。然而,该荟萃分析基于相对较小的研究。因此,设计了一项多中心前瞻性自然实验,利用治疗方案的自然变化和创伤的地理位置作为治疗分配机制,在更大规模上比较两种治疗方法。本文介绍了其方案。
纳入符合手术治疗条件的原发性锁骨中段骨折患者(≥16 岁)。治疗分配将根据事故发生地和提供治疗的当地医院的地理位置决定。在两个中心,单钢板是这些患者的首选治疗方法。在另外两个中心,低切迹双钢板已成为标准治疗。对于低切迹双钢板组,将使用一个上置的 VariAx 2.0mm 和一个前置的 VariAx 2.4mm 或 2.7mm 钢板。对于单钢板组,将使用标准的当地可用植入物。总共纳入 336 例患者。主要观察指标为再次干预。次要结局指标包括并发症、手术时间、切口长度、功能评分(DASH、EQ-5D-DL、VAS-疼痛/满意度)和成本效益。
本研究将确定低切迹双钢板在锁骨中段骨折中的临床和成本效益是否优于单钢板技术。该研究还将深入了解骨科创伤研究中自然实验研究设计的性能。
该研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,标识符为 NCT05579873。