• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意分配在互补联合行动中:联合目标如何影响空间定位。

Attention allocation in complementary joint action: How joint goals affect spatial orienting.

机构信息

Institute of Sports Science, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.

Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1574-1593. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02779-1. Epub 2023 Sep 8.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-023-02779-1
PMID:37684501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11557662/
Abstract

When acting jointly, individuals often attend and respond to the same object or spatial location in complementary ways (e.g., when passing a mug, one person grasps its handle with a precision grip; the other receives it with a whole-hand grip). At the same time, the spatial relation between individuals' actions affects attentional orienting: one is slower to attend and respond to locations another person previously acted upon than to alternate locations ("social inhibition of return", social IOR). Achieving joint goals (e.g., passing a mug), however, often requires complementary return responses to a co-actor's previous location. This raises the question of whether attentional orienting, and hence the social IOR, is affected by the (joint) goal our actions are directed at. The present study addresses this question. Participants responded to cued locations on a computer screen, taking turns with a virtual co-actor. They pursued either an individual goal or performed complementary actions with the co-actor, in pursuit of a joint goal. Four experiments showed that the social IOR was significantly modulated when participant and co-actor pursued a joint goal. This suggests that attentional orienting is affected not only by the spatial but also by the social relation between two agents' actions. Our findings thus extend research on interpersonal perception-action effects, showing that the way another agent's perceived action shapes our own depends on whether we share a joint goal with that agent.

摘要

当个体共同行动时,他们通常以互补的方式关注和响应相同的对象或空间位置(例如,当传递一个杯子时,一个人用精确握力抓住杯子的把手;另一个人则用整个手掌握住杯子)。与此同时,个体动作之间的空间关系会影响注意力的定向:个体对他人先前作用过的位置的注意和反应会比对其他位置的注意和反应更慢(“社会返回抑制”,social IOR)。然而,实现共同目标(例如传递一个杯子)通常需要对共同行动者先前的位置做出互补的反应。这就提出了一个问题,即我们的注意力定向,以及由此产生的社会 IOR 是否受到我们的动作指向的(共同)目标的影响。本研究旨在解决这个问题。参与者在电脑屏幕上对提示的位置做出反应,与一个虚拟的共同行动者轮流行动。他们要么追求个人目标,要么与共同行动者一起执行互补的动作,以追求共同目标。四个实验表明,当参与者和共同行动者追求共同目标时,社会 IOR 会显著受到调节。这表明注意力定向不仅受到空间关系的影响,还受到两个主体动作之间的社会关系的影响。因此,我们的发现扩展了关于人际知觉-动作效应的研究,表明另一个主体感知到的动作如何塑造我们自己的动作,取决于我们是否与该主体共享共同目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d5/11557662/d6aa3f42074c/13414_2023_2779_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d5/11557662/af6b8c1461b2/13414_2023_2779_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d5/11557662/24b6c8a3b3de/13414_2023_2779_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d5/11557662/4b5da8a3b016/13414_2023_2779_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d5/11557662/d6aa3f42074c/13414_2023_2779_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d5/11557662/af6b8c1461b2/13414_2023_2779_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d5/11557662/24b6c8a3b3de/13414_2023_2779_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d5/11557662/4b5da8a3b016/13414_2023_2779_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d5/11557662/d6aa3f42074c/13414_2023_2779_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Attention allocation in complementary joint action: How joint goals affect spatial orienting.注意分配在互补联合行动中:联合目标如何影响空间定位。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1574-1593. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02779-1. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
2
Knowledge of response location alone is not sufficient to generate social inhibition of return.仅知道反应位置不足以产生返回抑制。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Nov;153:153-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.10.007. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
3
How a co-actor's task affects monitoring of own errors: evidence from a social event-related potential study.共同行为者的任务如何影响自身错误监控:来自社会事件相关电位研究的证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):397-404. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2615-1. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
4
Social Beliefs and Visual Attention: How the Social Relevance of a Cue Influences Spatial Orienting.社会信念与视觉注意:线索的社会相关性如何影响空间定向。
Cogn Sci. 2018 May;42 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):161-185. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12529. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
5
Visual attention and action: How cueing, direct mapping, and social interactions drive orienting.视觉注意与行为:提示、直接映射和社会互动如何驱动定向。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1585-1605. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1354-0.
6
Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.注意力定向中空间和非空间返回抑制(IOR)的神经关联
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Sep;46(11):2766-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.05.017. Epub 2008 May 24.
7
A role of goals for social inhibition of return?目标在社会性返回抑制中起作用吗?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Dec;69(12):2402-2418. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1112417.
8
Effect of different directions of attentional shift on inhibition of return in three-dimensional space.不同注意转移方向对三维空间中返回抑制的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Apr;78(3):838-47. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-1055-6.
9
Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set.调节单侧忽视中的注意偏向:策略集的作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2001 Apr;137(3-4):432-44. doi: 10.1007/s002210000642.
10
What first drives visual attention during the recognition of object-directed actions? The role of kinematics and goal information.在识别目标导向动作的过程中,是什么首先驱动视觉注意力?运动学和目标信息的作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Oct;81(7):2400-2409. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01784-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Choice history biases in dyadic decision making.二元决策中的选择历史偏差。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 3;15(1):11420. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96182-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Sharing motor plans while acting jointly: A TMS study.共同动作时的运动计划共享:一项 TMS 研究。
Cortex. 2022 Jun;151:224-239. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
2
How shared goals shape action monitoring.共享目标如何塑造行为监控。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Oct 20;32(21):4934-4951. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac019.
3
Reward Weakened Inhibition of Return (IOR) in the Near Depth Plane.奖励近深度平面的抑制返回(IOR)减弱。
Perception. 2022 Feb;51(2):114-130. doi: 10.1177/03010066211073855. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
4
The motor-related brain activity that supports joint action: A review.支持联合动作的与运动相关的大脑活动:综述。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Jan;212:103218. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103218. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
5
Humans share task load with a computer partner if (they believe that) it acts human-like.如果(人们认为)计算机伙伴表现得像人类一样,那么人类就会与它分担任务。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Jan;212:103205. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103205. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
6
Realistic precision and accuracy of online experiment platforms, web browsers, and devices.在线实验平台、网络浏览器和设备的真实精度和准确性。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1407-1425. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01501-5. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
7
Social information rapidly prioritizes overt but not covert attention in a joint spatial cueing task.在联合空间线索任务中,社会信息迅速将外显注意而非内隐注意进行优先排序。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Nov;211:103188. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103188. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
8
The timing mega-study: comparing a range of experiment generators, both lab-based and online.时机大研究:比较一系列实验生成器,包括基于实验室的和在线的。
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 20;8:e9414. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9414. eCollection 2020.
9
The effect of co-actor group membership on the social inhibition of return effect.共同行动者群体成员身份对返回抑制效应的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Jul;208:103119. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103119. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
10
The sociality of social inhibition of return.社会抑制返回的社会性。
Cognition. 2020 Feb;195:104108. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104108. Epub 2019 Dec 2.