Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Centre for Faculty Development, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 8;23(1):648. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04636-z.
Healthcare students must learn to collaborate across professional boundaries so they can make use of each other's knowledge and competencies in a way that benefits the patient. One aspect of interprofessional collaboration implies negotiating what needs to be done and by whom. Research, focused on the conditions under which students perform this negotiation when they are working together during interprofessional clinical placement, needs to be further developed. The study therefore aimed to explore students' negotiation of tasks and competencies when students are working together as an interprofessional team during clinical placement.
The study was designed as a focused ethnographic observational study. Two Nordic sites where final-year healthcare students perform clinical interprofessional education were included. Data consists of fieldnotes, together with informal conversations, group, and focus group interviews. In total, 160 h of participating observations and 3 h of interviews are included in the study. The analysis was informed by the theory on communities of practice.
Students relate to intersecting communities of practice when they negotiate what they should do to help a patient and who should do it. When the different communities of practice align, they support students in coming to an agreement. However, these communities of practice sometimes pulled the students in different directions, and negotiations were sometimes interrupted or stranded. On those occasions, observations show how the interprofessional learning practice conflicted with either clinical practice or one of the student's profession-specific practices. Conditions that had an impact on whether or not communities of practice aligned when students negotiated these situations proved to be 'having time to negotiate or not', as well as 'feeling safe or not'.
Final-year healthcare students can negotiate who in the team has the competence suited for a specific task. However, they must adapt their negotiations to different communities of practice being enacted at the same time. Educators need to be attentive to this and make an effort to ensure that students benefit from these intersecting communities of practice, both when they align and when they are in conflict.
医疗保健专业的学生必须学会跨越专业界限进行协作,以便能够利用彼此的知识和能力,使患者受益。 协作的一个方面意味着协商需要做什么以及由谁来做。 需要进一步研究学生在进行跨专业临床实习时共同合作时进行这种协商的条件。 因此,本研究旨在探讨学生在临床实习期间作为跨专业团队一起工作时对任务和能力的协商。
本研究设计为重点民族志观察研究。 纳入了两个北欧地点,在那里,最后一年的医疗保健专业学生进行临床跨专业教育。 数据包括实地笔记,以及非正式对话、小组和焦点小组访谈。 研究共包括 160 小时的参与观察和 3 小时的访谈。 分析受实践社区理论的启发。
当学生协商他们应该做什么来帮助患者以及谁应该做时,他们与交叉的实践社区相关联。 当不同的实践社区保持一致时,他们会支持学生达成协议。 然而,这些实践社区有时会将学生引向不同的方向,协商有时会中断或搁浅。 在这些情况下,观察结果表明,当学生协商这些情况时,跨专业学习实践是如何与临床实践或学生特定职业实践之一发生冲突的。 对实践社区是否在学生协商这些情况时保持一致产生影响的条件被证明是“是否有时间进行协商”以及“是否感到安全”。
最后一年的医疗保健专业学生可以协商团队中谁具有适合特定任务的能力。 然而,他们必须根据同时实施的不同实践社区来调整他们的协商。 教育者需要注意这一点,并努力确保学生从这些交叉的实践社区中受益,无论是在他们保持一致还是发生冲突时。