• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情时期的健康素养教育:4 个欧洲国家面向大学生健康专业学生的教育项目的开发与试点。

Health literacy education at the time of COVID-19: development and piloting of an educational programme for university health professional students in 4 European countries.

机构信息

Regional Health Agency Marche Region, Palazzo Rossini - via Gentile da Fabriano n.3, Ancona, 60125, Italy.

IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 8;23(1):650. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04608-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-023-04608-3
PMID:37684654
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10492329/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health literacy has a strong influence on individual health outcomes and the sustainability of healthcare systems. Healthcare professionals often overestimate patients' health literacy levels and lack adequate competencies to address limited health literacy effectively. Therefore, promoting understanding through effective health communication between professionals and citizens is becoming increasingly important. Although health literacy has recently gained more attention, health literacy educational programmes targeting future healthcare professionals are still scarce, especially in Europe. This study describes the piloting process of a pan-European health literacy educational programme and shows how the educational material is being used during time of crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

The educational programme was developed through the definition of an educational philosophy and iterative co-creation processes consisting of stakeholders' consultations, material development and pilots with students. The evaluation was carried out in Italy through four pilot tests involving 107 students of health-related degrees. An evaluation questionnaire and a pre-post test were developed and used to collect students' and educators' feedback (quantitative and qualitative) and assess changes in health literacy awareness, respectively. Three additional pilots were organized in Italy and Germany mostly during the COVID-19 pandemic to evaluate the feasibility of the educational programme through online and hybrid learning, respectively.

RESULTS

The pilots received positive feedback from both students and educators. Students were highly satisfied with the courses, reported their relevance for their future profession and appreciated the interactive teaching methods. The pre-post test showed a significant improvement in health literacy awareness after the training. Educators reported the adequacy and flexibility of the training material, the ease of transferability of the content of the lessons into practice, and the validity of the tested options to integrate the educational programme into the curricula.

CONCLUSIONS

Our comprehensive, evidence-based educational programme contributes to addressing the existing challenges in Europe, and its flexibility allows for easy integration in the curricula, through different options, hence supporting a widespread uptake in the European Union and maybe beyond. Health literacy education is a useful tool to improve citizens' access to healthcare information and services, achieve better health outcomes and support healthcare systems' sustainability.

摘要

背景

健康素养对个体健康结果和医疗保健系统的可持续性有很强的影响。医疗保健专业人员往往高估患者的健康素养水平,并且缺乏足够的能力来有效应对有限的健康素养。因此,促进专业人员和公民之间有效的健康沟通以提高理解变得越来越重要。尽管健康素养最近受到了更多的关注,但针对未来医疗保健专业人员的健康素养教育计划仍然很少,特别是在欧洲。本研究描述了一个泛欧健康素养教育计划的试点过程,并展示了在 COVID-19 大流行等危机期间如何使用教育材料。

方法

该教育计划是通过定义教育理念和迭代共同创造过程来制定的,这些过程包括利益相关者的咨询、材料的开发以及与学生一起进行的试点。在意大利通过涉及 107 名健康相关学位学生的四个试点进行了评估。开发了一个评估问卷和一个前后测试,以收集学生和教育者的反馈(定量和定性),并评估健康素养意识的变化。还在意大利和德国组织了另外三个试点,主要是在 COVID-19 大流行期间,通过在线和混合学习分别评估教育计划的可行性。

结果

试点得到了学生和教育者的积极反馈。学生对课程非常满意,报告说这些课程与他们未来的职业相关,并赞赏互动式教学方法。培训后,健康素养意识明显提高。教育者报告说培训材料的充分性和灵活性、将课程内容转移到实践中的便利性以及测试选项的有效性,以将教育计划纳入课程。

结论

我们的综合、基于证据的教育计划有助于应对欧洲目前面临的挑战,其灵活性允许通过不同的选择轻松地将其纳入课程,从而支持在欧盟及其他地区的广泛采用。健康素养教育是提高公民获得医疗保健信息和服务的机会、实现更好的健康结果和支持医疗保健系统可持续性的有用工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6597/10492329/e13db84aca24/12909_2023_4608_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6597/10492329/d58c972670cd/12909_2023_4608_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6597/10492329/e13db84aca24/12909_2023_4608_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6597/10492329/d58c972670cd/12909_2023_4608_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6597/10492329/e13db84aca24/12909_2023_4608_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Health literacy education at the time of COVID-19: development and piloting of an educational programme for university health professional students in 4 European countries.新冠疫情时期的健康素养教育:4 个欧洲国家面向大学生健康专业学生的教育项目的开发与试点。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 8;23(1):650. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04608-3.
2
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
3
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
4
Development and piloting of a blended learning training programme for physicians and medical students to enhance their competences in evidence-based decision-making.为医生和医学生开发并试行一个混合式学习培训项目,以提高他们基于证据的决策能力。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020 Apr;150-152:104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 May 19.
5
Developing and pilot testing a comprehensive health literacy communication training for health professionals in three European countries.在三个欧洲国家为卫生专业人员开发和试点综合健康素养传播培训。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jan;101(1):152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
6
A cross-sectional study of discipline-based self-perceived digital literacy competencies of nursing students.护理专业学生基于学科的自我感知数字素养能力的横断面研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Feb;80(2):656-672. doi: 10.1111/jan.15801. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
7
The Relationship Between eHealth Literacy and Self-Efficacy Levels in Midwifery Students Receiving Distance Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间远程教育的助产学生的电子健康素养与自我效能感之间的关系。
J Nurs Res. 2022 Mar 2;30(2):e203. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000474.
8
Differences in digital health literacy and future anxiety between health care and other university students in England during the COVID-19 pandemic.英格兰在 COVID-19 大流行期间医护生与非医护大学生的数字健康素养和未来焦虑差异。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;22(1):658. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13087-y.
9
[A proposal for reforming psychologists' training in France and in the European Union].[关于法国及欧盟心理学家培训改革的一项提议]
Encephale. 2009 Feb;35(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.11.008. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
10
Health literacy among Danish university students enrolled in health-related study programmes.丹麦参与健康相关学习项目的大学生的健康素养。
Scand J Public Health. 2017 Dec;45(8):831-838. doi: 10.1177/1403494817733356. Epub 2017 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Process evaluation of a co-design and implementation study to improve professional health literacy in a regional care hospital (PIKoG): a mixed-methods study.一项旨在提高地区护理医院专业健康素养的协同设计与实施研究(PIKoG)的过程评估:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 15;25(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12679-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Determinants of Health Literacy and Its Associations With Health-Related Behaviors, Depression Among the Older People With and Without Suspected COVID-19 Symptoms: A Multi-Institutional Study.健康素养的决定因素及其与有和无症状的 COVID-19 老年人相关健康行为和抑郁的关系:一项多机构研究。
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 16;8:581746. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.581746. eCollection 2020.
2
COVID-19: health literacy is an underestimated problem.新冠疫情:健康素养是一个被低估的问题。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e249-e250. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30086-4. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
3
How to fight an infodemic.
如何应对信息疫情。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):676. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X.
4
Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Health Literacy Consultation Skills Training for Undergraduate Medical Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial.综合性健康素养咨询技能培训对本科医学生的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 20;17(1):81. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010081.
5
Patient Perspectives to Inform a Health Literacy Educational Program: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.从患者视角出发的健康素养教育项目:系统评价和定性研究的主题综合分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 5;16(21):4300. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214300.
6
Health-Literacy Training for First-Year Respiratory Therapy Students: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.对呼吸治疗专业一年级学生进行健康素养培训:一项混合方法的试点研究。
Respir Care. 2020 Jan;65(1):68-74. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06896. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
7
Medical students' perceptions towards learning communication skills: a qualitative study following the 2-year training programme.医学生对学习沟通技巧的认知:一项为期两年培训项目后的定性研究。
Int J Med Educ. 2019 May 3;10:90-97. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5cbd.7e96.
8
Priorities and challenges for health leadership and workforce management globally: a rapid review.全球卫生领导力与劳动力管理的优先事项和挑战:快速综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 24;19(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4080-7.
9
Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions.在公共卫生干预措施的共同创造和评估中运用参与式方法的框架、原则和建议。
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Jan 9;5:2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0136-9. eCollection 2019.
10
Health literacy as a determinant, mediator and/or moderator of health: empirical models using the European Health Literacy Survey dataset.健康素养作为健康的决定因素、中介因素和/或调节因素:使用欧洲健康素养调查数据集的实证模型
Glob Health Promot. 2018 Nov 14:1757975918788300. doi: 10.1177/1757975918788300.