García-Pintor Beatriz, Morales-Rodríguez Francisco Manuel, Pérez-Mármol José Manuel
Association in Favour of People with Intellectual Disability-ASPROGRADES, 18007 Granada, Spain.
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 23;11(17):2374. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11172374.
Institutionalized individuals with intellectual disabilities have few opportunities to participate in instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), which probably affects higher cognitive functions, or vice versa. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the possible difference in the ability to perform IADLs and executive functioning between individuals with and without intellectual disabilities and to determine if executive functions are associated with the performance of IADLs in people with intellectual disabilities. This was a multi-center cross-sectional study, conducted between July 2019 and May 2020. Participants with intellectual disabilities were recruited from four centers for people with intellectual disabilities. Adults without these disabilities were gathered from several community centers. The sample consisted of 90 individuals with moderate intellectual disabilities and 79 individuals with no intellectual disability. Executive functions were evaluated using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-WAIS-IV, the INECO Frontal Screening test, the Semantic Verbal Fluency Test, and the Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome-BADS-Scale. The performance of the IADLs was assessed by the Lawton and Brody Scale. The results showed that the higher the function in instrumental activities, the lower the impairment of executive functions. Executive functions accounted for 81% of the total variance in the ability to perform the IADLs. In conclusion, individuals with moderate intellectual disabilities demonstrated limitations in executing the IADLs, which were partially associated with low performance in executive functions. This information could help in the development of evidence-based intervention programs and facilitate the formulation of appropriate support strategies to enhance participation in these activities.
患有智力残疾的机构收容人员几乎没有机会参与日常生活中的工具性活动(IADL),这可能会影响更高层次的认知功能,反之亦然。本研究的目的是评估有和没有智力残疾的个体在执行IADL和执行功能方面的能力可能存在的差异,并确定执行功能是否与智力残疾者的IADL表现相关。这是一项多中心横断面研究,于2019年7月至2020年5月进行。智力残疾参与者从四个智力残疾者中心招募。没有这些残疾的成年人从几个社区中心收集。样本包括90名中度智力残疾个体和79名无智力残疾个体。使用韦氏成人智力量表第四版(WAIS-IV)、INECO额叶筛查测试、语义言语流畅性测试和执行功能障碍综合征行为评估量表(BADS量表)评估执行功能。IADL的表现通过劳顿和布罗迪量表进行评估。结果表明,工具性活动功能越高,执行功能受损程度越低。执行功能占IADL执行能力总方差的81%。总之,中度智力残疾个体在执行IADL方面表现出局限性,这部分与执行功能表现不佳有关。这些信息有助于制定循证干预计划,并促进制定适当的支持策略,以增强对这些活动的参与。