• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发性流产和反复种植失败患者子宫内膜中的自然杀伤细胞和T细胞亚型:对妊娠成功的影响

NK and T Cell Subtypes in the Endometrium of Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Recurrent Implantation Failure: Implications for Pregnancy Success.

作者信息

Braun Anne-Sophie, Vomstein Kilian, Reiser Elisabeth, Tollinger Susanne, Kyvelidou Christiana, Feil Katharina, Toth Bettina

机构信息

Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegård Allé 30, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 27;12(17):5585. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175585.

DOI:10.3390/jcm12175585
PMID:37685653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10488644/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

RPL and RIF are challenges in reproductive medicine. The immune system plays a pivotal role in endometrial receptivity, successful implantation, and pregnancy complications. Immunological changes have been associated with RPL and RIF. Understanding immune dysregulation especially in NK and T cell subtypes may lead to better diagnostic concepts and treatments. From July 2019 to August 2020 patients with RPL and RIF underwent a standardized diagnostic procedure including endometrial biopsies. Immune cell analysis was performed using flow cytometry. Patients were contacted in March 2023 and interviewed concerning their pregnancy outcomes following diagnostics.

RESULTS

Out of 68 patients undergoing endometrial biopsies, 49 patients were finally included. Live birth rates were high with 72% in RPL and 86% in RIF. Immune cell analysis revealed that patients with RPL had more cytotoxic CD56CD16 cells, while RIF patients had more CD56 uNK cells. RPL patients with pregnancy complications showed increased NKT cell percentages.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest specific immune changes in RPL and RIF patients, offering potential therapeutic targets. Tailored immunotherapy based on endometrial immunophenotyping might be an option, but further research is needed.

摘要

背景

复发性流产(RPL)和反复种植失败(RIF)是生殖医学中的难题。免疫系统在子宫内膜容受性、成功着床及妊娠并发症中起关键作用。免疫变化与RPL和RIF相关。了解免疫失调,尤其是自然杀伤细胞(NK)和T细胞亚群的失调,可能会带来更好的诊断理念和治疗方法。2019年7月至2020年8月,RPL和RIF患者接受了包括子宫内膜活检在内的标准化诊断程序。使用流式细胞术进行免疫细胞分析。2023年3月与患者取得联系,并就诊断后的妊娠结局进行了访谈。

结果

在68例行子宫内膜活检的患者中,最终纳入49例。活产率较高,RPL患者为72%,RIF患者为86%。免疫细胞分析显示,RPL患者具有更多的细胞毒性CD56CD16细胞,而RIF患者具有更多的CD56未成熟NK细胞。有妊娠并发症的RPL患者自然杀伤T细胞(NKT)百分比增加。

结论

我们的研究结果提示RPL和RIF患者存在特定的免疫变化,提供了潜在的治疗靶点。基于子宫内膜免疫表型分析的个体化免疫治疗可能是一种选择,但仍需进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d4e/10488644/949faf4f574a/jcm-12-05585-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d4e/10488644/92cded8e57da/jcm-12-05585-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d4e/10488644/949faf4f574a/jcm-12-05585-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d4e/10488644/92cded8e57da/jcm-12-05585-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d4e/10488644/949faf4f574a/jcm-12-05585-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
NK and T Cell Subtypes in the Endometrium of Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Recurrent Implantation Failure: Implications for Pregnancy Success.复发性流产和反复种植失败患者子宫内膜中的自然杀伤细胞和T细胞亚型:对妊娠成功的影响
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 27;12(17):5585. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175585.
2
Endometrial HLA-F expression is influenced by genotypes and correlates differently with immune cell infiltration in IVF and recurrent implantation failure patients.子宫内膜 HLA-F 的表达受基因型影响,并与 IVF 和反复着床失败患者的免疫细胞浸润相关程度不同。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Jul 30;37(8):1816-1834. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac118.
3
Unlocking the Uterine Code: Microbiota, Immune Cells, and Therapy for Recurrent Reproductive Failure.解锁子宫密码:微生物群、免疫细胞与复发性生殖失败的治疗
Microorganisms. 2024 Mar 9;12(3):547. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12030547.
4
Number and function of uterine natural killer cells in recurrent miscarriage and implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.复发性流产和着床失败中子宫自然杀伤细胞的数量和功能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2022 Jun 30;28(4):548-582. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmac006.
5
Endometrial uNK cell counts do not predict successful implantation in an IVF population.子宫内膜 uNK 细胞计数不能预测 IVF 人群中的着床成功。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Dec 1;34(12):2456-2466. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez194.
6
Detailed endometrial immune assessment of both normal and adverse reproductive outcome populations.详细的子宫内膜免疫评估,包括正常和不良生殖结局人群。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Feb;36(2):199-210. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1300-8. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
7
Expression of natural cytotoxicity receptors and cytokine production on endometrial natural killer cells in women with recurrent pregnancy loss or implantation failure, and the expression of natural cytotoxicity receptors on peripheral blood natural killer cells in pregnant women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss.复发性流产或植入失败女性子宫内膜自然杀伤细胞上自然细胞毒性受体的表达及细胞因子产生,以及有复发性流产病史孕妇外周血自然杀伤细胞上自然细胞毒性受体的表达。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017 Nov;43(11):1678-1686. doi: 10.1111/jog.13448. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
8
Upregulation of immune genes in the proliferative phase endometrium enables classification into women with recurrent pregnancy loss versus controls.增殖期子宫内膜中免疫基因的上调能够将复发性流产女性与对照组女性区分开来。
Hum Reprod. 2025 Jun 1;40(6):1045-1065. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf051.
9
Functional NK surrogate biomarkers for inflammatory recurrent pregnancy loss and recurrent implantation failure.功能性自然杀伤细胞替代生物标志物在炎症性复发性妊娠丢失和复发性种植失败中的作用。
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2021 Aug;86(2):e13426. doi: 10.1111/aji.13426. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
10
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failure.胚胎植入前遗传学检测非整倍体:胚胎非整倍体性复发性流产或反复着床失败患者活产率的比较。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Dec 1;34(12):2340-2348. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez229.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular subtype of recurrent implantation failure reveals distinct endometrial etiology of female infertility.复发性植入失败的分子亚型揭示了女性不孕症独特的子宫内膜病因。
J Transl Med. 2025 Jul 14;23(1):792. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06771-1.
2
The impact of GnRH agonists on endometrial immune cells in patients with adenomyosis: a prospective cohort study.GnRH激动剂对子宫腺肌病患者子宫内膜免疫细胞的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Med. 2025 Jun 9;23(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04162-3.
3
Dual Role of Natural Killer Cells in Early Pregnancy: Immunopathological Implications and Therapeutic Potential in Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion and Recurrent Implantation Failure.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibiotic-free vaginal microbiota transplant with donor engraftment, dysbiosis resolution and live birth after recurrent pregnancy loss: a proof of concept case study.无抗生素阴道微生物群移植:供体植入、失调解决及复发性流产后活产——一项概念验证案例研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jun 26;61:102070. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102070. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Establishment of reference intervals of endometrial immune cells during the mid-luteal phase.建立黄体中期子宫内膜免疫细胞的参考区间。
J Reprod Immunol. 2023 Mar;156:103822. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2023.103822. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
3
Natural Killer Cells in the Human Uterine Mucosa.
自然杀伤细胞在早期妊娠中的双重作用:对复发性自然流产和反复种植失败的免疫病理学影响及治疗潜力
Cell Prolif. 2025 May 5:e70037. doi: 10.1111/cpr.70037.
4
Shared diagnostic biomarkers and underlying mechanisms between endometriosis and recurrent implantation failure.子宫内膜异位症与反复种植失败之间共享的诊断生物标志物及潜在机制。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 19;16:1490746. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1490746. eCollection 2025.
5
Exploring the Immunological Aspects and Treatments of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Recurrent Implantation Failure.探索复发性流产和反复种植失败的免疫学方面及治疗方法。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Feb 3;26(3):1295. doi: 10.3390/ijms26031295.
6
Vitamin D Supplementation Selectively Affects Peripheral Lymphocyte Subsets in Infertile Women.补充维生素D对不孕女性外周血淋巴细胞亚群有选择性影响。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Oct 16;18:2125-2134. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S470258. eCollection 2024.
7
The Effects of Cancer Immunotherapy on Fertility: Focus on Hematological Malignancies.癌症免疫疗法对生育能力的影响:聚焦血液系统恶性肿瘤
Biomedicines. 2024 Sep 15;12(9):2106. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12092106.
8
Effects of Cetrorelix on Ovary and Endometrium Prior to Anti-PD-L1 Antibody in Murine Model.在小鼠模型中,西曲瑞克对卵巢和子宫内膜的抗 PD-L1 抗体的影响。
Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2024 Feb;21(2):319-328. doi: 10.1007/s13770-023-00617-x. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
人类子宫黏膜中的自然杀伤细胞
Annu Rev Immunol. 2023 Apr 26;41:127-151. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-102119-075119. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
4
Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in women with four or more recurrent pregnancy losses: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.静脉注射免疫球蛋白治疗有四次或更多次复发性流产的女性:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Jun 29;50:101527. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101527. eCollection 2022 Aug.
5
Immune determinants of endometrial receptivity: a biological perspective.子宫内膜容受性的免疫决定因素:生物学视角。
Fertil Steril. 2022 Jun;117(6):1107-1120. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.04.023.
6
Intralipid therapy and adverse reproductive outcome: is there any evidence?脂肪乳剂治疗与不良妊娠结局:有相关证据吗?
Reprod Fertil. 2021 Jun 3;2(3):173-186. doi: 10.1530/RAF-20-0052. eCollection 2021 Jul.
7
Determining Diagnostic Criteria of Unexplained Recurrent Implantation Failure: A Retrospective Study of Two Three or More Implantation Failure.确定不明原因反复种植失败的诊断标准:两次或两次以上种植失败的回顾性研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 22;12:619437. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.619437. eCollection 2021.
8
Crosstalk Between Trophoblasts and Decidual Immune Cells: The Cornerstone of Maternal-Fetal Immunotolerance.滋养层细胞与蜕膜免疫细胞的对话:母胎免疫耐受的基石。
Front Immunol. 2021 Feb 25;12:642392. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.642392. eCollection 2021.
9
Immunological Risk Factors in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Guidelines Versus Current State of the Art.复发性流产的免疫危险因素:指南与当前技术水平
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 20;10(4):869. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040869.
10
Definition, diagnostic and therapeutic options in recurrent implantation failure: an international survey of clinicians and embryologists.复发性种植失败的定义、诊断和治疗选择:对临床医生和胚胎学家的国际调查。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Jan 25;36(2):305-317. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa317.