Huff Merle, Edwards Katie M, Littleton Heather
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Jan;39(1-2):458-469. doi: 10.1177/08862605231195803. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
Research has largely neglected the issue of intimate partner violence (IPV) among transgender and gender-diverse (TGD; e.g., nonbinary and genderqueer) individuals. However, existing research suggests that TGD individuals are disproportionately affected by IPV. The current study sought to explore if and how rates of IPV vary among subgroups of TGD undergraduate students and contextual factors of IPV among TGD individuals including the co-occurrence of multiple forms of IPV victimization, the type of relationship in which IPV occurred, and the gender identity of the IPV perpetrator. Participants were 280 TGD undergraduate students attending 20 medium- and large-sized residential public universities across the contiguous United States. Of the entire sample of TGD undergraduate students ( = 280), a total of 27.5% endorsed past 6-month IPV victimization (20.0% psychological, 6.1% physical, 8.9% sexual, 11.4% coercive control, and 5.7% LGBTQIA+-specific). Among only the participants who endorsed past 6-month IPV victimization ( = 77), 45.4% reported one form of IPV victimization, 26.0% two forms, 22.1% three forms, and 6.5% four forms. Further, 41.3% of TGD IPV victims were in a casual relationship, 56.0% were in a serious relationship, and 2.7% were in multiple relationship types. Finally, 55.8% of victims reported their perpetrator was a man, 22.1% a woman, and 22.1% a TGD individual. No significant differences in rates of IPV were found between TGD respondents. These data highlight the urgent need for programming efforts on college campuses that are specifically designed to prevent and address IPV among and against TGD students. Future research should evaluate universal- and population-specific risk and protective factors for IPV among TGD individuals to inform prevention and response efforts for this highly vulnerable population.
研究在很大程度上忽视了跨性别和性别多样化(TGD;例如,非二元性别和酷儿性别)个体中的亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)问题。然而,现有研究表明,TGD个体受IPV影响的比例过高。本研究旨在探讨TGD本科生亚组中IPV发生率是否存在差异以及如何存在差异,以及TGD个体中IPV的背景因素,包括多种形式的IPV受害情况的共现、IPV发生时的关系类型以及IPV施暴者的性别认同。参与者是来自美国本土20所大中型住宿制公立大学的280名TGD本科生。在整个TGD本科生样本(n = 280)中,共有27.5%的人认可在过去6个月遭受过IPV侵害(20.0%为心理侵害、6.1%为身体侵害、8.9%为性侵害、11.4%为强制控制,以及5.7%为特定于LGBTQIA+群体的侵害)。在仅认可过去6个月遭受过IPV侵害的参与者(n = 77)中,45.4%报告遭受过一种形式的IPV侵害,26.0%报告两种形式,22.1%报告三种形式,6.5%报告四种形式。此外,41.3%的TGD IPV受害者处于随意关系中,56.0%处于认真的恋爱关系中,2.7%处于多种关系类型中。最后,55.8%的受害者报告其施暴者为男性,22.1%为女性,22.1%为TGD个体。在TGD受访者之间未发现IPV发生率的显著差异。这些数据凸显了在大学校园开展专门旨在预防和解决针对TGD学生以及TGD学生之间的IPV的项目工作的迫切需求。未来的研究应评估TGD个体中IPV的普遍和特定人群的风险及保护因素,以为针对这一高度脆弱人群的预防和应对工作提供信息。