• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动决策与基于计算机的被动决策导致结果评估存在差异:来自自我报告的情绪体验和大脑活动的证据。

Active vs. computer-based passive decision-making leads to discrepancies in outcome evaluation: evidence from self-reported emotional experience and brain activity.

机构信息

Center for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research & Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain-Machine Intelligence for Information Behavior, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai 20083, China.

College of International Business, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai 20083, China.

出版信息

Cereb Cortex. 2023 Oct 9;33(20):10676-10685. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad317.

DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhad317
PMID:37689832
Abstract

People prefer active decision-making and induce greater emotional feelings than computer-based passive mode, yet the modulation of decision-making mode on outcome evaluation remains unknown. The present study adopted event-related potentials to investigate the discrepancies in active and computer-based passive mode on outcome evaluation using a card gambling task. The subjective rating results showed that active mode elicited more cognitive effort and stronger emotional feelings than passive mode. For received outcomes, we observed no significant Feedback-Related Negativity (FRN) effect on difference waveshapes (d-FRN) between the 2 modes, but active decision-making elicited larger P300 amplitudes than the passive mode. For unchosen card outcomes, the results revealed larger d-FRN amplitudes of relative valences (Superior - Inferior) in responses to negative feedback in active mode than in passive mode. The averaged P300 results revealed an interplay among outcome feedback, decision-making mode, and relative valence, and the average P300 amplitude elicited by the received loss outcome in the active mode partially mediated the relationship between subjective cognitive effort and negative emotion ratings on loss. Our findings indicate discrepancies between active and computer-based passive modes, and cognitive effort and emotional experience involved in outcome evaluation.

摘要

人们更喜欢主动决策,并产生比基于计算机的被动模式更大的情绪感受,但决策模式对结果评估的调节作用仍不清楚。本研究采用事件相关电位技术,通过纸牌赌博任务,研究了主动和基于计算机的被动模式在结果评估上的差异。主观评分结果表明,主动模式比被动模式产生更多的认知努力和更强的情绪感受。对于所获得的结果,我们没有观察到两种模式之间差异波(d-FRN)上的反馈相关负波(FRN)效应有显著差异,但主动决策产生的 P300 振幅大于被动模式。对于未选中的牌结果,结果显示在主动模式中,对负反馈的反应中,相对效价(优-劣)的 d-FRN 振幅较大,而在被动模式中则较小。平均 P300 结果揭示了结果反馈、决策模式和相对效价之间的相互作用,并且在主动模式下收到损失结果所引起的平均 P300 振幅部分中介了主观认知努力和对损失的负面情绪评价之间的关系。我们的研究结果表明,主动和基于计算机的被动模式之间存在差异,以及认知努力和情绪体验在结果评估中所起的作用。

相似文献

1
Active vs. computer-based passive decision-making leads to discrepancies in outcome evaluation: evidence from self-reported emotional experience and brain activity.主动决策与基于计算机的被动决策导致结果评估存在差异:来自自我报告的情绪体验和大脑活动的证据。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Oct 9;33(20):10676-10685. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad317.
2
Self-other discrepancies in electrophysiological response to outcome evaluation in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task.在气球模拟风险任务中,对结果评估的电生理反应中存在自我-他人差异。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2021 Dec;170:6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.09.010. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
3
Incidental emotions influence risk preference and outcome evaluation.偶然情绪会影响风险偏好和结果评估。
Psychophysiology. 2016 Oct;53(10):1542-51. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12694. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
4
How do different kinds of incidental emotions influence risk decision making?不同类型的偶然情绪如何影响风险决策?
Biol Psychol. 2020 Jul;154:107920. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107920. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
5
Interpersonal relationship modulates brain responses to outcome evaluation when gambling for/against others: an electrophysiological analysis.人际互动关系在为他人赢/输而赌博时调节大脑对结果评估的反应:一项电生理学分析。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Oct;63:205-14. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.033. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
6
How does cognitive reappraisal affect the response to gains and losses?认知重评如何影响对得失的反应?
Psychophysiology. 2013 Nov;50(11):1094-103. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12091. Epub 2013 Jul 28.
7
Implicit emotion regulation affects outcome evaluation.内隐情绪调节会影响结果评价。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Jun;10(6):824-31. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu124. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
8
A negative emotional context disrupts the framing effect on outcome evaluation in decision making under uncertainty: An ERP study.消极情绪背景会干扰不确定性决策中结果评估的框架效应:一项ERP研究。
Psychophysiology. 2023 Apr;60(4):e14207. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14207. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
9
Social value orientation modulates context-based social comparison preference in the outcome evaluation: An ERP study.社会价值取向调节结果评估中基于情境的社会比较偏好:一项 ERP 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Apr;112:135-144. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.028. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
10
The interaction between state and dispositional emotions in decision making: An ERP study.决策中状态情绪与特质情绪的相互作用:一项ERP研究。
Biol Psychol. 2017 Feb;123:126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.11.009. Epub 2016 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The Decision-Making Experience of Self-Management Behaviors in Home Peritoneal Dialysis for Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy: A Qualitative Study Using the Theory of Planned Behavior.糖尿病肾病患者家庭腹膜透析自我管理行为的决策体验:一项基于计划行为理论的定性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Jul 31;19:2283-2294. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S537890. eCollection 2025.
2
Humans rationally balance detailed and temporally abstract world models.人类合理地平衡详细的和时间上抽象的世界模型。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jan 4;3(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00169-3.