Yamada Yasutaka, Sakamoto Shinichi, Sato Kodai, Saito Shinpei, Kanesaka Manato, Rii Junryo, Kurokawa Koichiro, Tachiwaki Daisuke, Fukui Yudai, Shibata Hiroki, Goto Yusuke, Sazuka Tomokazu, Imamura Yusuke, Nakatsu Hiroomi, Ichikawa Tomohiko
Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Department of Urology, Asahi General Hospital, Asahi, Japan.
Prostate. 2023 Dec;83(16):1610-1618. doi: 10.1002/pros.24619. Epub 2023 Sep 10.
The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) based on the serum albumin level and the lymphocyte count has been investigated as a prognostic factor in patients with malignant tumors. However, it has been poorly studied in prostate cancer (PCa), and little is known about its clinical utility.
Clinical data of 353 patients with de novo, metastatic, hormone-sensitive PCa (mHSPC) who received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were obtained from multiple institutions between 2000 and 2019. The impacts of the pretreatment PNI level on treatment response and survival, together with clinical parameters, were examined. The Mann-Whitney U test, Cox proportional hazards models, and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to evaluate significance.
The median age and initial prostate-specific antigen level were 73 and 266.18 ng/mL, respectively. Patients with a low PNI had shorter progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, low PNI was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.0027, HR = 1.65), as well as advanced age (p = 0.049, HR = 1.38), the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG) 5 (p = 0.0027, HR = 1.69), and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (p < 0.0001, HR = 2.08). A propensity score-matching analysis showed that the PNI level remained a significant prognostic biomarker for PFS (p = 0.0263), CSS (p = 0.0006), and OS (p = 0.0015). Furthermore, a novel risk classification using PNI, LDH, and the ISUP GG was established to stratify patients' prognosis. An increase in the number of risk factors was significantly correlated with poor outcomes.
A low pretreatment PNI might be an effective biomarker of poor treatment response and survival in patients with mHSPC undergoing ADT.
基于血清白蛋白水平和淋巴细胞计数的预后营养指数(PNI)已被作为恶性肿瘤患者的一个预后因素进行研究。然而,其在前列腺癌(PCa)中的研究较少,对其临床应用知之甚少。
收集了2000年至2019年间多家机构353例初发、转移性、激素敏感性PCa(mHSPC)且接受雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)患者的临床资料。研究了治疗前PNI水平对治疗反应和生存的影响以及临床参数。采用Mann-Whitney U检验、Cox比例风险模型和Kaplan-Meier方法评估其显著性。
患者的中位年龄和初始前列腺特异性抗原水平分别为73岁和266.18 ng/mL。PNI低的患者无进展生存期(PFS)、癌症特异性生存期(CSS)和总生存期(OS)较短(p < 0.0001)。多因素分析显示,低PNI是OS的独立预后因素(p = 0.0027,HR = 1.65),此外还有高龄(p = 0.049,HR = 1.38)、国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)5级(p = 0.0027,HR = 1.69)以及乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)升高(p < 0.0001,HR = 2.08)。倾向评分匹配分析表明,PNI水平仍是PFS(p = 0.0263)、CSS(p = 0.0006)和OS(p = 0.0015)的显著预后生物标志物。此外,建立了一种使用PNI、LDH和ISUP分级的新风险分类方法来对患者的预后进行分层。风险因素数量的增加与不良预后显著相关。
治疗前低PNI可能是接受ADT的mHSPC患者治疗反应不佳和生存不良的有效生物标志物。