Department of Basic and Translational Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, 19104, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City NY 10032, USA.
Biomaterials. 2023 Nov;302:122312. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122312. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
Biologics are unaffordable to a large majority of the global population because of prohibitively expensive fermentation systems, purification and the requirement for cold chain for storage and transportation. Limitations of current production and delivery systems of biologics were evident during the recent pandemic when <2.5% of vaccines produced were available to low-income countries and ∼19 million doses were discarded in Africa due to lack of cold-chain infrastructure. Among FDA-approved biologics since 2015, >90% are delivered using invasive methods. While oral or topical drugs are highly preferred by patients because of their affordability and convenience, only two oral drugs have been approved by FDA since 2015. A newly launched oral biologic costs only ∼3% of the average cost of injectable biologics because of the simplified regulatory approval process by elimination of prohibitively expensive fermentation, purification, cold storage/transportation. In addition, the cost of developing a new biologic injectable product (∼$2.5 billion) has been dramatically reduced through oral or topical delivery. Topical delivery has the unique advantage of targeted delivery of high concentration protein drugs, without getting diluted in circulating blood. However, only very few topical drugs have been approved by the FDA. Therefore, this review highlights recent advances in oral or topical delivery of proteins at early or advanced stages of human clinical trials using chewing gums, patches or sprays, or nucleic acid drugs directly, or in combination with, nanoparticles and offers future directions.
由于发酵系统、纯化和储存及运输所需的冷链费用过高,生物制剂对全球大多数人来说都难以负担。在最近的大流行期间,生物制剂的当前生产和交付系统的局限性显而易见,当时只有<2.5%的疫苗可供低收入国家使用,由于缺乏冷链基础设施,非洲约有 1900 万剂疫苗被丢弃。自 2015 年以来,美国食品和药物管理局批准的生物制剂中,>90%是通过侵入性方法给药的。虽然口服或局部用药物因其价格低廉和使用方便而受到患者的高度青睐,但自 2015 年以来,只有两种口服药物获得了美国食品和药物管理局的批准。一种新推出的口服生物制剂的成本仅为注射用生物制剂平均成本的约 3%,因为简化了监管审批程序,省去了昂贵的发酵、纯化、冷藏/运输步骤。此外,通过口服或局部递送来开发新的生物制剂注射产品的成本(约 25 亿美元)也大幅降低。局部给药具有将高浓度蛋白药物靶向递送至特定部位的独特优势,而不会在循环血液中被稀释。然而,只有极少数局部用药物获得了美国食品和药物管理局的批准。因此,本文综述了使用咀嚼胶、贴片或喷雾剂,或直接使用核酸药物,或与纳米颗粒联合使用,在人体临床试验的早期或晚期阶段口服或局部递蛋白的最新进展,并提供了未来的方向。