Davis J, Scheinman M M, Ruder M A, Griffin J C, Herre J M, Finkebeiner W E, Chin M C, Eldar M
Circulation. 1986 Nov;74(5):1044-53. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.74.5.1044.
Five patients with chronic or recurrent ectopic supraventricular tachycardias unresponsive to drugs underwent programmed stimulation, endocardial mapping, and attempted catheter ablation of the arrhythmia focus. For attempted ablation, an intracardiac electrode catheter was positioned near the exit point of the tachycardia and served as the cathode while a chest wall patch served as the anode. In two patients with tachycardia originating near the coronary sinus, discharges of 200 or 400 J each were delivered to two electrodes at the earliest area of endocardial activation. These two patients with incessant tachycardia remain free of tachycardia for 17 and 11 months, respectively. In one patient with tachycardia originating from the right atrial appendage, both catheter and surgical ablation proved unsuccessful in that a new focus of atrial tachycardia supervened. This patient subsequently underwent successful catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction. Two patients with junctional tachycardia underwent catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction. Complete atrioventricular block followed atrioventricular junctional ablation and these patients required permanent cardiac pacing. The junctional tachycardia was replaced by sinus rhythm with episodes of unsustained atrial tachycardia. However, after 13 +/- 5 months follow-up, neither of the patients require antiarrhythmic drugs. Catheter ablation can be effective for atrial foci near the coronary sinus os, and can be performed with preservation of atrioventricular conduction. Arrhythmia ablation is possible in those with atrioventricular junctional tachycardia but requires the sacrifice of atrioventricular conduction. After ablation, other automatic atrial foci may become operative and complicate use of dual-chamber pacemakers.
五名慢性或复发性异位室上性心动过速且对药物无反应的患者接受了程控刺激、心内膜标测,并尝试对心律失常病灶进行导管消融。为了尝试消融,将心内电极导管放置在心动过速出口点附近,作为阴极,而胸壁贴片作为阳极。在两名起源于冠状窦附近的心动过速患者中,分别向最早的心内膜激动区域的两个电极输送了200焦耳或400焦耳的放电量。这两名持续性心动过速患者分别在17个月和11个月内未再出现心动过速。在一名起源于右心耳的心动过速患者中,导管消融和手术消融均未成功,因为出现了新的房性心动过速病灶。该患者随后成功接受了房室结导管消融。两名交界性心动过速患者接受了房室结导管消融。房室结消融后出现了完全性房室传导阻滞,这些患者需要永久性心脏起搏。交界性心动过速被窦性心律取代,伴有非持续性房性心动过速发作。然而,经过13±5个月的随访,这两名患者均无需使用抗心律失常药物。导管消融对于冠状窦口附近的心房病灶可能有效,并且可以在保留房室传导的情况下进行。对于房室交界性心动过速患者,心律失常消融是可行的,但需要牺牲房室传导。消融后,其他自动性心房病灶可能会起作用,并使双腔起搏器的使用复杂化。