• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Screening the Drug-Drug Interactions Between Antimicrobials and Other Prescribed Medications Using Google Bard and Lexicomp® Online™ Database.使用谷歌巴德和Lexicomp® Online™数据库筛查抗菌药物与其他处方药物之间的药物相互作用
Cureus. 2023 Sep 9;15(9):e44961. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44961. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Determination of potential drug-drug interactions in prescription orders dispensed in a community pharmacy setting using Micromedex and Lexicomp: a retrospective observational study.使用Micromedex和Lexicomp确定社区药房环境中处方医嘱中的潜在药物相互作用:一项回顾性观察研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Apr;44(2):348-356. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01346-8. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
3
Retrospective cohort observation on psychotropic drug-drug interaction and identification utility from 3 databases: Drugs.com®, Lexicomp®, and Epocrates®.回顾性队列观察 3 个数据库(Drugs.com®、Lexicomp® 和 Epocrates®)中的精神药物药物相互作用和识别效用。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 22;18(6):e0287575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287575. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparative analysis of three drug-drug interaction screening systems against probable clinically relevant drug-drug interactions: a prospective cohort study.针对可能具有临床相关性的药物相互作用,对三种药物相互作用筛查系统进行的比较分析:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jul;73(7):875-882. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2232-4. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
5
Prevalence of drug-drug interactions in oncology patients enrolled on National Clinical Trials Network oncology clinical trials.在国家临床试验网络肿瘤临床试验中入组的肿瘤患者中药物-药物相互作用的发生率。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 22;18(1):1155. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5076-0.
6
Real world co-prescribing contraindicated drugs with fluconazole and itraconazole.与氟康唑和伊曲康唑同时开具禁忌药物的真实世界情况。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 Jul;32(7):752-762. doi: 10.1002/pds.5604. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
7
Evaluation of drug-drug interactions in cancer patients treated at a university hospital in North Cyprus using two interaction databases.评价使用两个药物相互作用数据库在北塞浦路斯大学附属医院治疗的癌症患者中的药物-药物相互作用。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 Jul;24(7):1067-1071. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_266_20.
8
Prevalence and associated factors of drug-drug interactions in elderly outpatients in a tertiary care hospital: a cross-sectional study based on three databases.三级医院老年门诊患者药物相互作用的患病率及相关因素:基于三个数据库的横断面研究
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Jan 15;11(1):17. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-5463.
9
Determination and comparison of potential drug-drug interactions using three different databases in northern cyprus community pharmacies.使用北塞浦路斯社区药房中的三个不同数据库确定和比较潜在的药物-药物相互作用。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2022 Dec;25(12):2005-2009. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_448_22.
10
A Systematic Review of Gastric Acid-Reducing Agent-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions with Orally Administered Medications.胃酸还原剂与口服药物介导的药物相互作用的系统评价
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020 Apr;59(4):447-462. doi: 10.1007/s40262-019-00844-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and clinical significance of potential drug-drug interactions of antimicrobials in Intensive Care Unit patients: a retrospective study.重症监护病房患者抗菌药物潜在药物相互作用的患病率及临床意义:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2025 May 14;26(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s40360-025-00925-z.
2
A scoping review on generative AI and large language models in mitigating medication related harm.关于生成式人工智能和大语言模型在减轻药物相关危害方面的范围综述。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Mar 28;8(1):182. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01565-7.
3
Medication use and potential drug-drug interactions in a general surgery clinic: A descriptive study.普通外科门诊的用药情况及潜在药物相互作用:一项描述性研究。
Heliyon. 2025 Feb 6;11(4):e42511. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42511. eCollection 2025 Feb 28.
4
Large language models facilitating modern molecular biology and novel drug development.大型语言模型助力现代分子生物学和新型药物研发。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Dec 24;15:1458739. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1458739. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence and associated factors of drug-drug interactions in elderly outpatients in a tertiary care hospital: a cross-sectional study based on three databases.三级医院老年门诊患者药物相互作用的患病率及相关因素:基于三个数据库的横断面研究
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Jan 15;11(1):17. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-5463.
2
Determination of potential drug-drug interactions in prescription orders dispensed in a community pharmacy setting using Micromedex and Lexicomp: a retrospective observational study.使用Micromedex和Lexicomp确定社区药房环境中处方医嘱中的潜在药物相互作用:一项回顾性观察研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Apr;44(2):348-356. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01346-8. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
3
Prevalence of clinically manifested drug interactions in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.住院患者中临床显著药物相互作用的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0235353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235353. eCollection 2020.
4
The prevalence and severity of potential drug-drug interactions among adult polypharmacy patients at outpatient clinics in Jordan.约旦门诊成年多病用药患者中潜在药物相互作用的发生率和严重程度。
Saudi Pharm J. 2020 Feb;28(2):155-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2019.11.009. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
5
Potential drug-drug interactions among hospitalized patients in a developing country.发展中国家住院患者中潜在的药物相互作用。
Caspian J Intern Med. 2017 Fall;8(4):282-288. doi: 10.22088/cjim.8.4.282.
6
Prescriber response to computerized drug alerts for electronic prescriptions among hospitalized patients.住院患者中处方医生对电子处方的计算机化药物警报的反应。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Nov;107:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
7
A comparison of five common drug-drug interaction software programs regarding accuracy and comprehensiveness.对五个常见药物相互作用软件程序在准确性和全面性方面的比较。
J Res Pharm Pract. 2016 Oct-Dec;5(4):257-263. doi: 10.4103/2279-042X.192461.
8
Analysis of drug-related problems in three departments of a German University hospital.德国一家大学医院三个科室的药物相关问题分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Feb;38(1):119-26. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0213-1. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
9
Analysis of reference sources used in drug-related Wikipedia articles.药物相关维基百科文章中使用的参考文献来源分析。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Jul;103(3):140-4. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.007.
10
Drug-drug interaction software in clinical practice: a systematic review.临床实践中的药物相互作用软件:一项系统评价
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Feb;71(2):131-42. doi: 10.1007/s00228-014-1786-7. Epub 2014 Dec 23.

使用谷歌巴德和Lexicomp® Online™数据库筛查抗菌药物与其他处方药物之间的药物相互作用

Screening the Drug-Drug Interactions Between Antimicrobials and Other Prescribed Medications Using Google Bard and Lexicomp® Online™ Database.

作者信息

Sulaiman Dilveen M, Shaba Suhail S, Almufty Hind B, Sulaiman Asmaa M, Merza Muayad A

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Duhok, Duhok, IRQ.

Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Duhok, Duhok, IRQ.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Sep 9;15(9):e44961. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44961. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.44961
PMID:37692178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10492649/
Abstract

Aim This study aimed to critically appraise the drug-drug interaction (DDI) screening performance of Google Bard (Google AI, Mountain View, California, United States) by comparing it with the authorized Lexicomp® Online™ database (Wolters Kluwer Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States). Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted between April 2023 and August 2023, and enrolled 414 prescriptions that had been collected randomly between April 2023 and June 2023. These prescriptions were processed individually by Lexicomp online and Google Bard to screen for DDIs between antimicrobials and other prescribed medications. Results The total number of DDIs based on Lexicomp and Google Bard were 90 and 68, respectively. Cohen's Kappa (κ) values showed that there was a nil to slight agreement between Lexicomp and Google Bard regarding the DDI risk rating (κ=0.01). Regarding the severity rate, there was a slight agreement between them (κ=0.02), but in terms of reliability rate, there was no agreement (κ =-0.02). Conclusion This study unveiled differences between Lexicomp and Google Bard regarding their DDI identification, severity rating, and reliability rates. It is fundamental to consider that both tools have their strengths and weaknesses and, therefore, should not be individually depended on for final clinical decisions. However, Lexicomp can be considered authoritative in screening DDIs, but Google Bard currently lacks the necessary precision and reliability for conducting such screenings.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在通过将谷歌巴德(Google Bard,谷歌人工智能,美国加利福尼亚州山景城)与经授权的Lexicomp® Online™数据库(美国宾夕法尼亚州费城的威科医疗集团)进行比较,对其药物相互作用(DDI)筛查性能进行批判性评估。方法 本横断面研究于2023年4月至2023年8月进行,纳入了2023年4月至2023年6月期间随机收集的414份处方。这些处方分别由Lexicomp在线平台和谷歌巴德进行处理,以筛查抗菌药物与其他处方药物之间的药物相互作用。结果 基于Lexicomp和谷歌巴德筛查出的药物相互作用总数分别为90例和68例。科恩kappa(κ)值表明,Lexicomp和谷歌巴德在药物相互作用风险评级方面的一致性为零至轻微(κ=0.01)。在严重率方面,两者之间存在轻微一致性(κ=0.02),但在可靠性率方面,不存在一致性(κ=-0.02)。结论 本研究揭示了Lexicomp和谷歌巴德在药物相互作用识别、严重程度评级和可靠性率方面存在差异。必须认识到这两种工具都有其优缺点,因此,最终临床决策不应仅依赖于它们。然而,Lexicomp在筛查药物相互作用方面可被视为权威,但谷歌巴德目前在进行此类筛查时缺乏必要的准确性和可靠性。