Nusair Mohammad B, Al-Azzam Sayer I, Arabyat Rasha M, Amawi Haneen A, Alzoubi Karem H, Rabah Asma A
Faculty of Pharmacy, Yarmouk University, Irbid 21110, Jordan.
Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.
Saudi Pharm J. 2020 Feb;28(2):155-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2019.11.009. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
To assess the prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) among polypharmacy patients in Jordan using Lexicomp®. Additionally, this study aims to categorize and rate the identified pDDIs according to interaction risk, severity, and reliability.
A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at six different hospitals representing different public health sectors in Jordan (ministry of health, royal medical services, and university-affiliated hospitals). Polypharmacy patients from outpatient clinics (e.g., cardiology,& and internal medicine) were identified, recruited, and interviewed by clinical pharmacists. pDDIs were assessed using the Lexicomp® mobile application and classified according to interaction risk rating, severity, and reliability rating. Furthermore, the prevalence of pDDIs across chronic medical conditions was assessed. P-value <0.05 was considered as significant.
A total of 801 patients with polypharmacy were identified. The average number of drugs per patient was 6.6 ± 1.96, with an average of 4.2 ± 3.0 pDDIs per patient. Potential drug-drug interactions were detected in 769 patients (96%), with a total of 3359 interactions. Blood pressure lowering agents were involved in 39.9% of the pDDIs. Cardiovascular system drugs contributed to the largest share of pDDIs (46.6%). While diuretics had the major share of interactions among cardiovascular system drugs (16.2%), drugs used in diabetes had the highest share across all groups (17.1%). The majority of pDDIs were of "C" risk rating with a moderate interaction severity, whilst 1.6% of pDDIs could have been avoided in the first place as the concurrent administration of these agents is contraindicated (i.e., risk rating X). Patients with cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, gout, and chronic kidney disease were associated with the highest number of potential drug-drug interactions.
Our study showed that 96% of polypharmacy patients at outpatient clinics have at least one pDDI. Almost half of the detected interactions involved cardiovascular medications. The majority of these pDDIs had moderate severity, with no more than 10% of the interactions requiring therapy modification.
使用Lexicomp®评估约旦联合用药患者中潜在药物相互作用(pDDIs)的发生率。此外,本研究旨在根据相互作用风险、严重程度和可靠性对已识别的pDDIs进行分类和评级。
在代表约旦不同公共卫生部门的六家不同医院(卫生部、皇家医疗服务机构和大学附属医院)开展了一项描述性横断面研究。门诊诊所(如心脏病科和内科)的联合用药患者由临床药师识别、招募并进行访谈。使用Lexicomp®移动应用程序评估pDDIs,并根据相互作用风险评级、严重程度和可靠性评级进行分类。此外,评估了不同慢性疾病中pDDIs的发生率。P值<0.05被视为具有统计学意义。
共识别出801例联合用药患者。每位患者的平均用药数量为6.6±1.96种,每位患者平均有4.2±3.0种pDDIs。769例患者(96%)检测到潜在药物相互作用,共有3359次相互作用。降压药涉及39.9%的pDDIs。心血管系统药物导致的pDDIs占比最大(46.6%)。虽然利尿剂在心血管系统药物的相互作用中占主要部分(16.2%),但糖尿病用药在所有类别中占比最高(17.1%)。大多数pDDIs为“C”风险评级,相互作用严重程度为中度,而1.6%的pDDIs由于这些药物的同时使用是禁忌的(即风险评级为X),本可首先避免。患有心血管疾病、糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、痛风和慢性肾病的患者潜在药物相互作用的数量最多。
我们的研究表明,门诊诊所96%的联合用药患者至少有一种pDDI。几乎一半检测到的相互作用涉及心血管药物。这些pDDIs大多数严重程度为中度,不超过10%的相互作用需要调整治疗方案。