Suppr超能文献

经导管主动脉瓣植入术在极重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的可行性

Feasibility of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Very Severe Aortic Stenosis.

作者信息

Kobayashi Yoshikuni, Izumo Masaki, Okuyama Kazuaki, Uenomachi Nina, Shoji Tatsuro, Kai Takahiko, Okuno Taishi, Sato Yukio, Kuwata Shingo, Koga Masashi, Ishibashi Yuki, Tanabe Yasuhiro, Miyairi Takeshi, Akashi Yoshihiro J

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kawasaki Japan.

Ultrasound Center, St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kawasaki Japan.

出版信息

Circ Rep. 2023 Aug 4;5(9):358-364. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0063. eCollection 2023 Sep 8.

Abstract

Very severe aortic stenosis (AS) has a poor prognosis even in asymptomatic patients, and asymptomatic very severe AS is a Class IIa indication for aortic valve replacement, although the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for very severe AS is not well-established. This study included 366 patients undergoing TAVI at a single center, with 85 and 281 patients in the very severe AS (peak velocity ≥5 m/s or mean pressure gradient (PG) ≥60 mmHg) and severe AS groups, respectively. Procedural and clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were compared between groups. The calcium scores were significantly higher in the very severe AS group (2,864.5 vs. 1,405.8 arbitrary units [AU] (P<0.001). Although the patient-prosthesis mismatch rate was higher in the very severe AS group (38.3% vs. 25.7%; P=0.029), there was no significant difference in the early safety and clinical efficacy between the groups (16.5% vs. 17.1% and 12.0% vs. 18.9%, respectively). Similarly, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality at 1 year (4.8% vs. 9.8%). Despite a higher incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch in those with very severe AS, the procedural and clinical outcomes were comparable to those in patients with severe AS. TAVI may be a reasonable treatment option for very severe AS.

摘要

即使是无症状患者,极重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的预后也很差,无症状极重度AS是主动脉瓣置换的IIa类指征,尽管经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)治疗极重度AS的安全性和有效性尚未完全确立。本研究纳入了在单一中心接受TAVI的366例患者,其中极重度AS组(峰值流速≥5 m/s或平均压力阶差(PG)≥60 mmHg)85例,重度AS组281例。比较两组患者1年随访时的手术和临床结局。极重度AS组的钙化积分显著更高(2864.5对1405.8任意单位[AU],P<0.001)。尽管极重度AS组的患者-人工瓣膜不匹配率更高(38.3%对25.7%;P=0.029),但两组之间的早期安全性和临床疗效无显著差异(分别为16.5%对17.1%和12.0%对18.9%)。同样,1年时的全因死亡率也无显著差异(4.8%对9.8%)。尽管极重度AS患者的人工瓣膜-患者不匹配发生率更高,但其手术和临床结局与重度AS患者相当。TAVI可能是极重度AS的一种合理治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3786/10483111/8471030acb51/circrep-5-358-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验