Kobayashi Yoshikuni, Izumo Masaki, Okuyama Kazuaki, Uenomachi Nina, Shoji Tatsuro, Kai Takahiko, Okuno Taishi, Sato Yukio, Kuwata Shingo, Koga Masashi, Ishibashi Yuki, Tanabe Yasuhiro, Miyairi Takeshi, Akashi Yoshihiro J
Department of Cardiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kawasaki Japan.
Ultrasound Center, St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kawasaki Japan.
Circ Rep. 2023 Aug 4;5(9):358-364. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0063. eCollection 2023 Sep 8.
Very severe aortic stenosis (AS) has a poor prognosis even in asymptomatic patients, and asymptomatic very severe AS is a Class IIa indication for aortic valve replacement, although the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for very severe AS is not well-established. This study included 366 patients undergoing TAVI at a single center, with 85 and 281 patients in the very severe AS (peak velocity ≥5 m/s or mean pressure gradient (PG) ≥60 mmHg) and severe AS groups, respectively. Procedural and clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were compared between groups. The calcium scores were significantly higher in the very severe AS group (2,864.5 vs. 1,405.8 arbitrary units [AU] (P<0.001). Although the patient-prosthesis mismatch rate was higher in the very severe AS group (38.3% vs. 25.7%; P=0.029), there was no significant difference in the early safety and clinical efficacy between the groups (16.5% vs. 17.1% and 12.0% vs. 18.9%, respectively). Similarly, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality at 1 year (4.8% vs. 9.8%). Despite a higher incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch in those with very severe AS, the procedural and clinical outcomes were comparable to those in patients with severe AS. TAVI may be a reasonable treatment option for very severe AS.
即使是无症状患者,极重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的预后也很差,无症状极重度AS是主动脉瓣置换的IIa类指征,尽管经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)治疗极重度AS的安全性和有效性尚未完全确立。本研究纳入了在单一中心接受TAVI的366例患者,其中极重度AS组(峰值流速≥5 m/s或平均压力阶差(PG)≥60 mmHg)85例,重度AS组281例。比较两组患者1年随访时的手术和临床结局。极重度AS组的钙化积分显著更高(2864.5对1405.8任意单位[AU],P<0.001)。尽管极重度AS组的患者-人工瓣膜不匹配率更高(38.3%对25.7%;P=0.029),但两组之间的早期安全性和临床疗效无显著差异(分别为16.5%对17.1%和12.0%对18.9%)。同样,1年时的全因死亡率也无显著差异(4.8%对9.8%)。尽管极重度AS患者的人工瓣膜-患者不匹配发生率更高,但其手术和临床结局与重度AS患者相当。TAVI可能是极重度AS的一种合理治疗选择。