Goel Amit, Katiyar Harshita, Tiwari Prachi, Rungta Sumit, Verma Abhai, Deep Amar, Sana Asari, Rai Praveer, Aggarwal Rakesh
Department of Hepatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Department of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2023 Sep-Oct;13(5):736-741. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
Sofosbuvir (S), daclatasvir (D), ledipasvir, or velpatasvir (V) containing first-line hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment regimens fail to cure viremia in 5-10%. We report our experience of HCV retreatment using these first-line drugs, in a setting where second-line anti-HCV drugs are not available.
Adults, who had relapsed after first complete course of a sofosbuvir-containing first-line, pegylated interferon free, anti-HCV treatment regimen with or without ribavirin (Riba) were included. Retreatment regimen, tailored to the failed anti-HCV regimen, was based on principle of using first-line drugs for 24 weeks with ribavirin and swapping between pangenotypic and genotype-specific regimens. Retreatment outcome was categorized as successful (achieved undetectable HCV RNA at the end of treatment [ETR] and sustained viral response at week 12 [SVR12]), non-responder (failed to achieve ETR), or relapse (achieved ETR but not achieved SVR12).
Twelve patients (9 male; 7 cirrhosis; all genotype 3) who had relapsed to prior anti-HCV treatment (4 SD12, 4 SD24, 1 SDRiba12, 1 SDRiba24, 2 SV12) were included. Following retreatment (2 SDRiba24, 10 SVRiba24), all achieved ETR but only 9 (75%) achieved SVR12. Two among three, in whom retreatment failed, achieved SVR12 following another course of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/ribavirin for 24 weeks. Overall, 11/12 (92%) patients achieved SVR12 following retreatment with the first-line anti-HCV drugs.
HCV retreatment could be a treatment option if second-line anti-HCV drugs are not available. Successful retreatment could be achieved, in a large proportion, with the use of first-line drugs for 24 weeks with ribavirin and swapping of pangenotypic/genotype-specific regimens (NCT03483987).
含索磷布韦(S)、达卡他韦(D)、来迪帕司韦或维帕他韦(V)的一线丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)治疗方案无法治愈5%-10%的病毒血症患者。我们报告了在无法获得二线抗HCV药物的情况下,使用这些一线药物进行HCV再治疗的经验。
纳入了在含索磷布韦的一线、不含聚乙二醇干扰素、抗HCV治疗方案(有或无利巴韦林[Riba])的首个完整疗程后复发的成人患者。根据失败的抗HCV方案量身定制再治疗方案,其原则是使用一线药物联合利巴韦林治疗24周,并在泛基因型和基因型特异性方案之间切换。再治疗结果分为成功(治疗结束时[ETR]HCV RNA检测不到且第12周时达到持续病毒学应答[SVR12])、无应答者(未达到ETR)或复发(达到ETR但未达到SVR12)。
纳入了12例先前抗HCV治疗后复发的患者(9例男性;7例肝硬化;均为基因3型)(4例索磷布韦/达卡他韦12周、4例索磷布韦/达卡他韦24周、1例索磷布韦/达卡他韦/利巴韦林12周、1例索磷布韦/达卡他韦/利巴韦林24周、2例索磷布韦/维帕他韦12周)。再治疗后(2例索磷布韦/达卡他韦/利巴韦林24周、10例索磷布韦/维帕他韦/利巴韦林24周),所有患者均达到ETR,但只有9例(75%)达到SVR12。在3例再治疗失败的患者中,有2例在接受另一个疗程的索磷布韦/维帕他韦/利巴韦林治疗24周后达到SVR12。总体而言,12例患者中有11例(92%)在使用一线抗HCV药物再治疗后达到SVR12。
如果没有二线抗HCV药物,HCV再治疗可能是一种治疗选择。使用一线药物联合利巴韦林治疗24周并切换泛基因型/基因型特异性方案,很大一部分患者可实现成功再治疗(NCT03483987)。