Hwang Liang-Dar, Cuellar-Partida Gabriel, Yengo Loic, Zeng Jian, Beaumont Robin N, Freathy Rachel M, Moen Gunn-Helen, Warrington Nicole M, Evans David M
Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Gilead Sciences, Inc, Forest City, CA, USA.
medRxiv. 2023 Aug 28:2023.08.22.23294446. doi: 10.1101/2023.08.22.23294446.
Perinatal traits are influenced by genetic variants from both fetal and maternal genomes. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of these phenotypes have typically involved separate fetal and maternal scans, however, this approach may be inefficient as it does not utilize the information shared across the individual GWAS. In this manuscript we investigate the performance of three strategies to detect loci in maternal and fetal GWAS of the same trait: (i) the traditional strategy of analysing maternal and fetal GWAS separately; (ii) a novel two degree of freedom test which combines information from maternal and fetal GWAS; and (iii) a novel one degree of freedom test where signals from maternal and fetal GWAS are meta-analysed together conditional on the estimated sample overlap. We demonstrate through a combination of analytical formulae and data simulation that the optimal strategy depends on the extent of sample overlap/relatedness between the maternal and fetal GWAS, the correlation between own and offspring phenotypes, whether loci jointly exhibit fetal and maternal effects, and if so, whether these effects are directionally concordant. We apply our methods to summary results statistics from a recent GWAS meta-analysis of birth weight from deCODE, the UK Biobank and the Early Growth Genetics (EGG) consortium. Both the two degree of freedom (213 loci) and meta-analytic approach (226 loci) dramatically increase the number of robustly associated genetic loci for birth weight relative to separately analysing the scans (183 loci). Our best strategy identifies an additional 62 novel loci compared to the most recent published meta-analysis of birth weight and implicates both known and new biological pathways in the aetiology of the trait. We implement our methods in the online DINGO (irect and direct effects analysis of enetic lci) software package, which allows users to perform one and/or two degree of freedom tests easily and computationally efficiently across the genome. We conclude that whilst the novel two degree of freedom test may be particularly useful for the analysis of certain perinatal phenotypes where many loci exhibit discordant maternal and fetal genetic effects, for most phenotypes, a simple meta-analytic strategy is likely to perform best, particularly in situations where maternal and fetal GWAS only partially overlap.
围产期特征受到来自胎儿和母体基因组的遗传变异的影响。对这些表型进行的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)通常涉及单独的胎儿和母体扫描,然而,这种方法可能效率低下,因为它没有利用个体GWAS之间共享的信息。在本论文中,我们研究了三种在同一性状的母体和胎儿GWAS中检测基因座的策略的性能:(i)分别分析母体和胎儿GWAS的传统策略;(ii)一种新颖的两自由度检验,它结合了来自母体和胎儿GWAS的信息;(iii)一种新颖的一自由度检验,其中来自母体和胎儿GWAS的信号在估计的样本重叠条件下进行荟萃分析。我们通过分析公式和数据模拟相结合的方式证明,最佳策略取决于母体和胎儿GWAS之间的样本重叠/相关性程度、自身与后代表型之间的相关性、基因座是否共同表现出胎儿和母体效应,以及如果是这样,这些效应是否在方向上一致。我们将我们的方法应用于来自deCODE、英国生物银行和早期生长遗传学(EGG)联盟最近进行的出生体重GWAS荟萃分析的汇总结果统计数据。相对于分别分析扫描结果(183个基因座),两自由度(213个基因座)和荟萃分析方法(226个基因座)都显著增加了与出生体重稳健相关的基因座数量。与最近发表的出生体重荟萃分析相比,我们的最佳策略识别出另外62个新基因座,并在该性状的病因学中涉及已知和新的生物学途径。我们在在线DINGO(基因座的直接和直接效应分析)软件包中实现了我们的方法,该软件包允许用户在全基因组范围内轻松且高效地进行一自由度和/或两自由度检验。我们得出结论,虽然新颖的两自由度检验对于分析某些围产期表型可能特别有用,在这些表型中许多基因座表现出不一致的母体和胎儿遗传效应,但对于大多数表型,简单的荟萃分析策略可能表现最佳,特别是在母体和胎儿GWAS仅部分重叠的情况下。