Suppr超能文献

在湿热环境中,间歇性体力活动期间,年轻男性在隔离时使用电风扇或与冰浆/冷水摄入和小腿浸泡联合使用,对其的影响。

Effect of electric fan use in isolation or combined with ice slurry/cold water ingestion and lower-leg immersion in young men during intermittent physical activity in hot-humid conditions.

机构信息

Faculty of physical activity sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada.

Research Center on Aging, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 4C4, Canada.

出版信息

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2023 Nov 1;48(11):851-862. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2023-0013. Epub 2023 Sep 12.

Abstract

Using a randomized crossover protocol, 10 young men completed four 180 min exposures (38 °C, 60% relative humidity), alternating between 30 min of walking and 30 min of sitting where fluid or ice slurry were served. Participants underwent four trials: (i) 5 mL·kg body mass of 20 °C water (CON); (ii) 5 mL·kg body mass of 20 °C water + fan at 4 m·s (FAN); (iii) fan + 3 mL·kg body mass of ice slurry + 2 mL·kg body mass of 4 °C water (FAN + ISCW); and (iv) FAN + ISCW + lower-leg immersion in 20 °C water (FAN + ISCW + LLI). Sweat and body mass losses were higher with FAN than CON, FAN + ISCW, and FAN + ISCW + LLI. Mean and peak changes in Δrectal temperature, heart rate, and perceived heat and thirst from baseline were not statistically and practically different between FAN and CON. FAN + ISCW + LLI decreased sweat loss compared with FAN + ISCW and mean and peak changes in Δrectal temperature, heart rate, and perceived thirst compared with CON. FAN + ISCW + LLI also attenuated the changes in Δrectal temperature (peak) and thirst (mean and peak) compared with FAN. In conclusion, FAN slightly exacerbates fluid loss but does not attenuate the changes in Δrectal temperature, heart rate, and perceived heat and thirst during intermittent physical activity in hot-humid conditions. However, coupling ISCW or ISCW + LLI with the use of a fan attenuates the increase in these outcomes compared with no intervention and to a greater extent for rectal temperature and thirst when fan is coupled with ISCW + LLI than when it is used in isolation.

摘要

采用随机交叉协议,10 名年轻男性完成了 4 次 180 分钟的暴露(38°C,60%相对湿度),在步行 30 分钟和坐 30 分钟之间交替,在此期间提供液体或冰浆。参与者进行了四项试验:(i)5 毫升·千克体重的 20°C 水(CON);(ii)5 毫升·千克体重的 20°C 水+风扇风速 4 米·秒(FAN);(iii)风扇+3 毫升·千克体重的冰浆+2 毫升·千克体重的 4°C 水(FAN+ISCW);(iv)FAN+ISCW+小腿浸泡在 20°C 水中(FAN+ISCW+LLI)。与 CON、FAN+ISCW 和 FAN+ISCW+LLI 相比,使用风扇时汗液和体重损失更高。与 CON 相比,FAN 时直肠温度、心率和感知热和口渴的平均和峰值变化在统计学和实际上没有差异。与 FAN+ISCW 相比,FAN+ISCW+LLI 降低了出汗量,与 CON 相比,直肠温度、心率和口渴的平均和峰值变化也降低了。与 FAN 相比,FAN+ISCW+LLI 还减弱了直肠温度(峰值)和口渴(平均和峰值)的变化。总之,在湿热环境中进行间歇性体力活动时,风扇会稍微加重液体流失,但不会减弱直肠温度、心率和感知热和口渴的变化。然而,与无干预相比,将冰浆或冰浆+LLI 与风扇结合使用会减弱这些结果的增加,当风扇与冰浆+LLI 结合使用时,比单独使用时,对直肠温度和口渴的影响更大。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验