Edwards Shelley R, Chamoun Gabrielle, Hecox Emily, Brown Madyson I, Hoppe Ian C, Arnold Peter B, Humphries Laura S
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.
Department of Surgery, HMH Palisades Medical Center, North Bergen, NJ 07047, USA.
J Burn Care Res. 2024 Jan 5;45(1):158-164. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irad139.
Specialized burn centers are critical to minimizing burn-associated morbidity and mortality. However, American Burn Association-verified burn centers are unequally distributed across the United States, and fewer centers are available for pediatric patients relative to adults. The economic burden of transporting patients to these centers contributes significantly to the high cost of burn care. This study quantifies inequitable burn care access in the contiguous United States due to age group and location as a function of physical proximity to a verified burn center and transportation cost. County-level distances to the nearest verified adult or pediatric burn center were determined and mapped. Distance calculations for each population were combined with transport cost data (2022 CMS Ambulance Fee Schedules) to estimate transportation costs for each population (adult vs pediatric, urban vs rural). Pediatric patients reside 30.5 miles further than adults from the nearest center, significantly increasing transportation costs. Ground and air transport costs also increased for rural versus urban patients. Notably, rural patients face almost double the cost of air transport. While physical proximity to burn care appears to differ only modestly across age and region, this marginal increase in distance is associated with significant economic impact. This study highlights physical and economic barriers to burn care access faced by rural and pediatric patients and underscores the critical need to improve equity in burn care access. Future studies should expand on this report's findings to more fully characterize the additional costs associated with inequitable burn care access.
专业烧伤中心对于将烧伤相关的发病率和死亡率降至最低至关重要。然而,经美国烧伤协会认证的烧伤中心在美国各地分布不均,相对于成人患者,儿科患者可就诊的中心较少。将患者转运至这些中心的经济负担在很大程度上导致了烧伤治疗的高昂成本。本研究量化了在美国本土由于年龄组和地理位置不同,因与经认证的烧伤中心的实际距离以及交通成本而导致的烧伤护理可及性不平等情况。确定并绘制了县级地区到最近的经认证的成人或儿科烧伤中心的距离。将每个人口群体的距离计算结果与交通成本数据(2022年医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心救护车收费表)相结合,以估算每个人口群体(成人与儿科、城市与农村)的交通成本。儿科患者距离最近的中心比成人远30.5英里,这显著增加了交通成本。农村患者与城市患者相比,地面和空中运输成本也有所增加。值得注意的是,农村患者面临的空中运输成本几乎是城市患者的两倍。虽然在年龄和地区方面,与烧伤护理的实际距离差异似乎不大,但距离的这种微小增加却带来了巨大的经济影响。本研究凸显了农村和儿科患者在获得烧伤护理方面面临的实际和经济障碍,并强调了改善烧伤护理可及性公平性的迫切需求。未来的研究应在本报告的基础上进一步拓展,以更全面地描述与不公平的烧伤护理可及性相关的额外成本。