Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Salt Lake City VAMC, UT, USA.
J Physiol. 2023 Oct;601(20):4557-4572. doi: 10.1113/JP284870. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
We investigated the role of the exercise pressor reflex (EPR) in regulating the haemodynamic response to locomotor exercise. Eight healthy participants (23 ± 3 years, : 49 ± 6 ml/kg/min) performed constant-load cycling exercise (∼36/43/52/98% ; 4 min each) without (CTRL) and with (FENT) lumbar intrathecal fentanyl attenuating group III/IV locomotor muscle afferent feedback and, thus, the EPR. To avoid different respiratory muscle metaboreflex and arterial chemoreflex activation during FENT, subjects mimicked the ventilatory response recorded during CTRL. Arterial and leg perfusion pressure (femoral arterial and venous catheters), femoral blood flow (Doppler-ultrasound), microvascular quadriceps blood flow index (indocyanine green), cardiac output (inert gas breathing), and systemic and leg vascular conductance were quantified during exercise. There were no cardiovascular and ventilatory differences between conditions at rest. Pulmonary ventilation, arterial blood gases and oxyhaemoglobin saturation were not different during exercise. Furthermore, cardiac output (-2% to -12%), arterial pressure (-7% to -15%) and leg perfusion pressure (-8% to -22%) were lower, and systemic (up to 16%) and leg (up to 27%) vascular conductance were higher during FENT compared to CTRL. Leg blood flow, microvascular quadriceps blood flow index, and leg O -transport and utilization were not different between conditions (P > 0.5). These findings reflect a critical role of the EPR in the autonomic control of the heart, vasculature and, ultimately, arterial pressure during locomotor exercise. However, the lack of a net effect of the EPR on leg blood flow challenges the idea of this cardiovascular reflex as a key determinant of leg O -transport during locomotor exercise in healthy, young individuals. KEY POINTS: The role of the exercise pressor reflex (EPR) in regulating leg O -transport during human locomotion remains uncertain. We investigated the influence of the EPR on the cardiovascular response to cycling exercise. Lumbar intrathecal fentanyl was used to block group III/IV leg muscle afferents and debilitate the EPR at intensities ranging from 30% to 100% . To avoid different respiratory muscle metaboreflex and arterial chemoreflex activation during exercise with blocked leg muscle afferents, subjects mimicked the ventilatory response recorded during control exercise. Afferent blockade increased leg and systemic vascular conductance, but reduced cardiac output and arterial-pressure, with no net effect on leg blood flow. The EPR influenced the cardiovascular response to cycling exercise by contributing to the autonomic control of the heart and vasculature, but did not affect leg blood flow. These findings challenge the idea of the EPR as a key determinant of leg O -transport during locomotor exercise in healthy, young individuals.
我们研究了运动加压反射(EPR)在调节运动性下肢运动血液动力学反应中的作用。8 名健康参与者(23 ± 3 岁,:49 ± 6 ml/kg/min)进行恒负荷踏车运动(约 30%/40%/50%/90%,持续 4 分钟),不进行(CTRL)和进行(FENT)腰段鞘内芬太尼阻断,从而阻断第三/四组运动肌传入反馈和 EPR。为了避免在 FENT 期间不同的呼吸肌代谢反射和动脉化学反射激活,受试者模拟在 CTRL 期间记录的通气反应。在运动期间,量化了动脉和腿部灌注压(股动脉和静脉导管)、股动脉血流(多普勒超声)、股四头肌血流指数(吲哚菁绿)、心输出量(惰性气体呼吸)以及全身和腿部血管传导率。在休息时,两种情况下的心血管和通气无差异。运动期间,肺通气、动脉血气和氧合血红蛋白饱和度无差异。此外,与 CTRL 相比,FENT 时心输出量(-2%至-12%)、动脉压(-7%至-15%)和腿部灌注压(-8%至-22%)降低,全身(最高 16%)和腿部(最高 27%)血管传导率升高。两种情况下的腿部血流量、股四头肌血流指数、腿部 O 传输和利用无差异(P>0.5)。这些发现反映了 EPR 在运动性下肢运动的心脏、血管和最终动脉压的自主控制中的关键作用。然而,EPR 对腿部血流量没有净影响,这对这种心血管反射作为健康年轻人在运动性下肢运动中腿部 O 传输的关键决定因素的观点提出了挑战。
EPR 在调节人体运动时腿部 O 传输中的作用仍不确定。我们研究了 EPR 对踏车运动心血管反应的影响。使用腰段鞘内芬太尼阻断第三/四组腿部肌肉传入,在 30%至 100%的强度范围内削弱 EPR。为了避免在阻断腿部肌肉传入的运动中出现不同的呼吸肌代谢反射和动脉化学反射激活,受试者模拟在对照运动期间记录的通气反应。传入阻断增加了腿部和全身血管传导率,但降低了心输出量和动脉压,对腿部血流量没有净影响。EPR 通过有助于心脏和血管的自主控制来影响踏车运动的心血管反应,但不影响腿部血流量。这些发现对 EPR 作为健康年轻人在运动性下肢运动中腿部 O 传输的关键决定因素的观点提出了挑战。