• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较肥胖症单吻合与双吻合减重代谢手术:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison of Single Versus Double Anastomosis Bariatric Metabolic Surgery in Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2023 Nov;33(11):3545-3564. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06805-x. Epub 2023 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-023-06805-x
PMID:37700148
Abstract

Major BMS are modified through loop rather than Roux-en-Y type reconstruction recently, and this study systematically reviews the BMS from the perspective of SA (single anastomosis) and DA (double anastomosis) procedures, aiming to research the differences among bariatric procedures. A total of 39 studies compared SA- and DA-BMS were finally eligible for analysis after searching in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Compared with DA, SA shortens operative time and decreases complications especially obstruction, internal hernia, and reoperation. SA-GB (gastric bypass) has significantly higher %TWL and T2DM remission rate than DA-GB 1- and 5-year postoperatively. SA-DS (duodenal switch) has similar 1-year %TWL and lower 5-year %TWL, and comparable 1- and 5-year T2DM remission with DA-DS. SA provides significant advantages about simplicity and safety. This, together with the shorter learning curve, makes SA a promising choice.

摘要

最近,主要的胆肠吻合术通过吻合环而不是 Roux-en-Y 型重建来进行修改,本研究从单吻合口(SA)和双吻合口(DA)手术的角度系统地回顾了胆肠吻合术,旨在研究减肥手术之间的差异。在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 中搜索后,最终有 39 项研究比较了 SA 和 DA-BMS 符合纳入标准。与 DA 相比,SA 缩短了手术时间,减少了并发症,特别是梗阻、内疝和再次手术。SA-GB(胃旁路术)在术后 1 年和 5 年时的体重减轻百分比(%TWL)和 T2DM 缓解率显著高于 DA-GB。SA-DS(十二指肠转位术)在术后 1 年时的体重减轻百分比(%TWL)相似,但 5 年时的体重减轻百分比较低,与 DA-DS 的 1 年和 5 年 T2DM 缓解率相当。SA 具有简单和安全的显著优势。这一点,加上较短的学习曲线,使 SA 成为一种很有前途的选择。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Single Versus Double Anastomosis Bariatric Metabolic Surgery in Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.比较肥胖症单吻合与双吻合减重代谢手术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2023 Nov;33(11):3545-3564. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06805-x. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgeries in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.25kg/m2≤BMI<35kg/m2 的 2 型糖尿病患者行减重手术的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2021 Dec;31(12):5312-5321. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05725-y. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
3
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation.减肥手术治疗肥胖症的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13(41):1-190, 215-357, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta13410.
4
Postoperative morbidity and weight loss after revisional bariatric surgery for primary failed restrictive procedure: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.初次限制性减重手术后再次手术的发病率和体重减轻:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2022 Jun;102:106677. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106677. Epub 2022 May 16.
5
Outcomes of Mini vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A meta-analysis and systematic review.迷你胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的结果比较:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 May 16.
6
Remission of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) after Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB), and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB): A Systematic Review.袖状胃切除术(SG)、单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)治疗 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)缓解的系统评价。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 19;59(5):985. doi: 10.3390/medicina59050985.
7
Efficacy and Safety of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity: a Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.一种吻合术胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗肥胖症的疗效和安全性:Meta 分析和系统评价。
Obes Surg. 2023 Feb;33(2):611-622. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06401-5. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
8
Outcomes of single anastomosis duodeno ileal bypass and single anastomosis stomach ileal bypass for type II diabetes: a systematic review.单吻合口空肠回肠旁路术和单吻合口胃空肠旁路术治疗 2 型糖尿病的疗效比较:一项系统评价。
Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Sep-Nov;18(4):337-346. doi: 10.1080/17446651.2023.2218919. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
9
Outcomes of revisional surgery options after inadequate sleeve gastrectomy: A comprehensive network meta-analysis. sleeve 胃切除术效果不佳后的翻修手术选择:综合网络荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2024 Sep;48(9):2040-2057. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12293. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
10
Prepregnancy Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.孕前 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术:产科和新生儿结局的系统评价、成对比较和网络荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Jun;5(6):100914. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100914. Epub 2023 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-Port One Anastomosis Sleeve Gastrectomy with Transit Bipartition: Initial Experience and Technique.单孔双通道吻合套入式胃旁路术:初步经验与技术。
Obes Surg. 2024 Jul;34(7):2739-2743. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07295-1. Epub 2024 May 21.
2
Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in the evaluation of liver steatosis: data reliability in different respiratory phases and body positions.定量超声(QUS)在评估肝脂肪变性中的应用:不同呼吸相位和体位下的数据可靠性。
Radiol Med. 2024 Apr;129(4):549-557. doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01786-y. Epub 2024 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Standardization of the One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass Procedure for Morbid Obesity: Technical Aspects and Early Outcomes.病态肥胖症的单吻合口胃旁路手术标准化:技术要点与早期结果
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2023 Apr 1;33(2):162-170. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001148.
2
Loop versus Roux-en-Y duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy for type 2 diabetes: short-term outcomes of a single-center randomized controlled trial.袖状胃切除联合 Loop 与 Roux-en-Y 转流术治疗 2 型糖尿病:单中心随机对照试验的短期结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022 Nov;18(11):1277-1285. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
3
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Long Biliopancreatic Limb Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass 与 Long Biliopancreatic Limb Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass 比较。
Obes Surg. 2022 Mar;32(3):779-785. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05874-0. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
4
Similar Gut Hormone Secretions Two Years After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Pilot Study.单吻合口胃旁路术和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后两年肠道激素分泌相似:一项初步研究
Obes Surg. 2022 Mar;32(3):757-762. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05837-5. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
5
Sleeve Gastrectomy with Braun Anastomosis Transit Bipartition (B-TB): a Potential Midway Between Single Anastomosis and Roux-en-Y Transit Bipartition.袖状胃切除术联合 Braun 吻合中转二分法(B-TB):一种单吻合口和 Roux-en-Y 中转二分法之间的潜在中间术式。
Obes Surg. 2021 Dec;31(12):5500-5503. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05756-5. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
6
Long-Term (> 6 Years) Outcomes of Duodenal Switch (DS) Versus Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileostomy with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S): a Matched Cohort Study.十二指肠转流术(DS)与袖状胃旁路吻合术(SADI-S)治疗的长期(>6 年)结果:一项匹配队列研究。
Obes Surg. 2021 Dec;31(12):5117-5126. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05709-y. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
7
Early Outcomes and Mid-Term Safety of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Are Comparable with Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Single Center Experience.单吻合口胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的早期结果和中期安全性相当:单中心经验。
Obes Surg. 2021 Aug;31(8):3786-3792. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05508-5. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
8
Long-Term Efficacy of Bariatric Surgery for the Treatment of Super-Obesity: Comparison of SG, RYGB, and OAGB.减重手术治疗超级肥胖的长期疗效:SG、RYGB 和 OAGB 的比较。
Obes Surg. 2021 Aug;31(8):3391-3399. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05464-0. Epub 2021 May 16.
9
IFSO Update Position Statement on One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB).国际肥胖与代谢外科学会关于单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)的更新立场声明。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jul;31(7):3251-3278. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05413-x. Epub 2021 May 3.
10
One anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a 30-day follow-up review.单吻合口胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术:30 天随访回顾。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):498-503. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08309-0. Epub 2021 Feb 16.