Suppr超能文献

人类乳腺癌中类固醇受体检测的标准化——IV. 雌激素和孕激素受体检测在长期内实验室和实验室间的变异

Standardization of steroid receptor assays in human breast cancer--IV. Long-term within- and between-laboratory variation of estrogen and progesterone receptor assays.

作者信息

Koenders A, Thorpe S M

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1986 Aug;22(8):945-52. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(86)90061-1.

Abstract

One batch of lyophilized calf uterine cytosol was analyzed for estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER and PgR, respectively) content by 12 members of the EORTC Receptor Group on three different occasions over a total study period of 1 yr: One vial was included with each of 20 consecutive batches of routine tumor analyses between December 1983 and May 1984. Two vials were simultaneously assayed between July and August 1984 (within-run variation). One vial was analyzed at the end of 1984 (November-December). The overall mean ER and PgR values did not change systematically over the total study period of 1 yr. Within the various laboratories, the between-run variations of both ER and PgR assays were considerable and differed from one institution to another (7-26%). For both ER and PgR measurements the average within-run (n = 2) and between-run (n = 20) coefficients of variation were similar (8-9% and 16-17%, respectively). Comparison of the results from multiple sequential assays (c.v. = 12.9%) with those from single assays (c.v. = 21.2%) showed that about 60% of the between-laboratory variance in ER could be explained on the basis of the between-run variance. With regard to PgR analysis, however, the between-laboratory variance decreased only 25%. Standardized use of one type of protein assay (Coomassie brilliant blue) and a standard protein solution (human serum albumin) has decreased the between-laboratory variation of the protein analysis results to less than 15%.

摘要

欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)受体研究小组的12名成员在为期1年的总研究期间,分三次对一批冻干的小牛子宫胞质溶胶进行了雌激素和孕激素受体(分别为ER和PgR)含量分析:1983年12月至1984年5月期间,在连续20批常规肿瘤分析中,每批都包含1瓶该冻干品。1984年7月至8月同时检测了2瓶(批内变异)。1984年底(11月至12月)分析了1瓶。在1年的总研究期间,ER和PgR的总体平均水平没有系统性变化。在各个实验室中,ER和PgR检测的批间变异都相当大,且各机构之间存在差异(7%-26%)。对于ER和PgR测量,平均批内(n = 2)和批间(n = 20)变异系数相似(分别为8%-9%和16%-17%)。多次连续检测结果(变异系数=12.9%)与单次检测结果(变异系数=21.2%)的比较表明,ER实验室间变异中约60%可由批间变异解释。然而,对于PgR分析,实验室间变异仅降低了25%。使用一种类型的蛋白质检测方法(考马斯亮蓝法)和标准蛋白质溶液(人血清白蛋白)的标准化操作已将蛋白质分析结果的实验室间变异降低至15%以下。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验