Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Cancer Res Commun. 2023 Sep 11;3(9):1823-1829. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0191. eCollection 2023 Sep.
As life expectancy increases, the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening programs needs to be reassessed for the older population. We addressed the effect of test history in and outside organized screening at age 50-64 years on later cervical cancer risk. A case-control study was conducted by deriving 229 cases of 65-79 years old women with invasive cervical cancer in 2010-2019 from the Finnish Cancer Registry. Ten controls were matched for each case by birth year and hospital district. The effect of test uptake and abnormal results in 50-64 year olds on cancer risk was investigated using conditional logistic regression and adjusted for self-selection. Test uptake within the 50-64 years age group showed 75% lower odds of cervical cancer [adjusted OR (aOR) = 0.25; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.18-0.35]. Untested women had 4.9 times higher odds than those tested with normal results (aOR = 4.86; 95% CI, 3.42-6.92). Having at least one abnormal test result increased the odds by 2.5 when compared with only normal results but showed lower odds when compared with untested women. The importance of testing is exhibited by the result showing a reduction of odds of cancer to one-fourth for those tested compared with untested. Similarly, receiving abnormal results was protective of cancer compared with having no tests highlighting the importance of proper follow-up. Therefore, screening history should be considered when further developing cervical cancer screening programs with special interest in non-attenders and those receiving abnormal results at older ages.
To our knowledge, this is the first study from Finnish data describing the effect of test history on later cervical cancer at older ages. Focusing on the cervical tests taken within the Finnish national screening program and outside it highlights the overall importance of having cervical tests and adds this study into the slowly increasing number of studies considering all cervical testing in Finland.
随着预期寿命的延长,需要重新评估针对老年人群的宫颈癌筛查计划的效果。我们研究了 50-64 岁时在有组织筛查内外进行的检测史对以后宫颈癌风险的影响。通过从芬兰癌症登记处获得 2010-2019 年期间 65-79 岁患有浸润性宫颈癌的 229 名女性的病例对照研究,得出了 229 名病例。通过出生年份和医院区,为每个病例匹配了 10 个对照。使用条件逻辑回归调查了 50-64 岁时的检测参与度和异常结果对癌症风险的影响,并通过自我选择进行了调整。在 50-64 岁年龄组进行的检测显示出宫颈癌风险降低了 75%[调整后的比值比 (aOR) = 0.25;95%置信区间 (95%CI),0.18-0.35]。未接受检测的女性比接受正常结果检测的女性发生宫颈癌的可能性高 4.9 倍(aOR = 4.86;95%CI,3.42-6.92)。与仅有正常结果相比,至少有一次异常检测结果的几率增加了 2.5 倍,但与未接受检测的女性相比,几率降低了。与未接受检测的女性相比,接受检测的女性患癌症的几率降低了四分之一,这表明了检测的重要性。同样,与未接受检测相比,接受异常结果对癌症具有保护作用,这突出了适当随访的重要性。因此,在制定宫颈癌筛查计划时,应考虑筛查史,特别关注未参加者和年龄较大时接受异常结果的人群。
据我们所知,这是第一项来自芬兰数据的研究,描述了检测史对以后老年宫颈癌的影响。重点关注芬兰国家筛查计划内和计划外进行的宫颈检测,突出了进行宫颈检测的总体重要性,并将本研究纳入芬兰越来越多考虑所有宫颈检测的研究中。