• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Facilitated Intubation: Time to Re-examine an Old Technique With Its Associated Risks Mitigated by New Technology.辅助插管:是时候重新审视这项旧技术了,新技术可降低其相关风险。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 12;15(8):e43364. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43364. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Success and Complications of the Ketamine-Only Intubation Method in the Emergency Department.急诊中氯胺酮单一插管法的成功率和并发症。
J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;60(3):265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.10.042. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
3
Video Laryngoscopy Compared to Augmented Direct Laryngoscopy in Adult Emergency Department Tracheal Intubations: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) Study.视频喉镜与增强型直接喉镜在成人急诊科气管插管中的比较:国家急诊气道登记研究(NEAR)。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;27(2):100-108. doi: 10.1111/acem.13851. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
4
Describing the Challenges of Prehospital Rapid Sequence Intubation by Macintosh Blade Video Laryngoscopy Recordings.描述 Macintosh 叶片视频喉镜记录的院前快速序贯插管的挑战。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Aug;37(4):485-491. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22000851. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
5
Video laryngoscopy in pre-hospital critical care - a quality improvement study.院前重症监护中的视频喉镜检查——一项质量改进研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Jun 13;24:84. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0276-6.
6
Risk of peri-intubation adverse events during emergency department intubation of overdose patients: a national emergency airway registry (near) analysis.急诊部门对过量用药患者进行插管期间发生围插管期不良事件的风险:一项全国性紧急气道登记(NEAR)分析。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2022 Dec;60(12):1293-1298. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2022.2131564. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
7
An Innovative Inexpensive Portable Pulmonary Edema Intubation Simulator.一种创新的低成本便携式肺水肿插管模拟器。
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 15;5(2):I9-I20. doi: 10.21980/J8MM1R. eCollection 2020 Apr.
8
Endotracheal Intubation with the King Laryngeal Tube™ In Situ Using Video Laryngoscopy and a Bougie: A Retrospective Case Series and Cadaveric Crossover Study.使用视频喉镜和探条在原位 King 喉罩气道™ 进行气管插管:一项回顾性病例系列研究和尸体交叉研究。
J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;52(4):403-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.10.026. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
9
Effectiveness and risks of cricoid pressure during rapid sequence induction for endotracheal intubation.快速顺序诱导气管插管时环状软骨压迫的有效性及风险
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 18;2015(11):CD011656. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011656.pub2.
10
Video laryngoscopy is associated with improved first-pass intubation success compared with direct laryngoscopy in emergency department trauma patients.在急诊科创伤患者中,与直接喉镜检查相比,视频喉镜检查与首次插管成功率的提高相关。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Jan 22;2(1):e12373. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12373. eCollection 2021 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of first pass success without hypoxemia in trauma patients requiring emergent rapid sequence intubation.需要紧急快速顺序插管的创伤患者中无低氧血症的首次插管成功的预测因素。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021 Jun 30;6(1):e000588. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000588. eCollection 2021.
2
Effect of timing of intubation on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized cohort studies.COVID-19 危重症患者插管时机对临床结局的影响:一项非随机队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2021 Mar 25;25(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03540-6.
3
Peri-intubation cardiac arrest in the Emergency Department: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) study.急诊科插管期间心脏骤停:国家紧急气道登记研究(NEAR)。
Resuscitation. 2021 May;162:403-411. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.039. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
4
Video laryngoscopy is associated with improved first-pass intubation success compared with direct laryngoscopy in emergency department trauma patients.在急诊科创伤患者中,与直接喉镜检查相比,视频喉镜检查与首次插管成功率的提高相关。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Jan 22;2(1):e12373. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12373. eCollection 2021 Feb.
5
Success and Complications of the Ketamine-Only Intubation Method in the Emergency Department.急诊中氯胺酮单一插管法的成功率和并发症。
J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;60(3):265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.10.042. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
6
Obesity: A critical risk factor in the COVID-19 pandemic.肥胖:新冠疫情中的一个关键风险因素。
Clin Obes. 2020 Dec;10(6):e12403. doi: 10.1111/cob.12403. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
7
First-attempt intubation success and complications in patients with COVID-19 undergoing emergency intubation.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者急诊气管插管首次尝试的成功率及并发症
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Aug 12;1(5):699-705. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12219. eCollection 2020 Oct.
8
Pragmatic recommendations for intubating critically ill patients with suspected COVID-19.针对疑似新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)重症患者插管的实用建议。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Apr 13;1(2):80-84. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12063. eCollection 2020 Apr.
9
Emergency tracheal intubation in 202 patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: lessons learnt and international expert recommendations.中国武汉 202 例 COVID-19 患者的紧急气管插管:经验教训和国际专家建议。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jul;125(1):e28-e37. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.026. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
10
Consensus guidelines for managing the airway in patients with COVID-19: Guidelines from the Difficult Airway Society, the Association of Anaesthetists the Intensive Care Society, the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and the Royal College of Anaesthetists.COVID-19 患者气道管理共识指南:困难气道学会、麻醉师协会、重症监护学会、重症监护医学学院和皇家麻醉师学院指南。
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jun;75(6):785-799. doi: 10.1111/anae.15054. Epub 2020 Apr 1.

辅助插管:是时候重新审视这项旧技术了,新技术可降低其相关风险。

Facilitated Intubation: Time to Re-examine an Old Technique With Its Associated Risks Mitigated by New Technology.

作者信息

Lowe Joshua B, Yoo Michael J, Patrick John O, Bridwell Rachel E

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, USA.

Emergency Medicine, Royal Air Force (RAF) Lakenhealth Medical Center, RAF Lakenheath, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Aug 12;15(8):e43364. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43364. eCollection 2023 Aug.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.43364
PMID:37701008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10494483/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Facilitated intubation (FI) refers to intubation performed using a sedative or anesthetic drug as an induction agent, without the use of a paralytic (neuromuscular blocking agent). In comparison, rapid sequence intubation (RSI) employs both an induction agent and a paralytic drug. RSI has been seen to outperform FI in terms of first-pass success when performing direct laryngoscopy and was quickly adopted as the gold standard in all situations. Recently, ketamine-only intubation has been used in situations where there is distorted anatomy or apnea intolerance (physically and physiologically difficult airways) resulting in an increased risk of a can't intubate/can't oxygenate scenario or significant hypoxemia. Frequent and recurring national ketamine shortages have resulted in renewed interest in whether or not other forms of FI are feasible in an era where other factors that mitigate complictions in achieving first-pass success (video laryngoscopy, bougie use, semi-Fowler positioning) are commonly used. We present a case series with outcomes for profoundly hypoxic patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (physiologically difficult airways) undergoing FI during a time of national ketamine shortage, using modern techniques and technology to maximize first-pass success and minimize peri-intubation complication.

METHODS

We included patients with COVID-19 pneumonia with pre-intubation oxygen saturations of less than 80% (significant hypoxemia) requiring intubation who presented to a tertiary care center in southern United States between August 25, 2021, and October 22, 2021. In this specific cohort, patients underwent endotracheal intubation with midazolam for induction without the use of paralytic agents. We used video-assisted laryngoscopy to increase the success of the first-pass attempt as well as placing the patients in a semi-Fowler position (head of bed elevation 30-45°) and bilevel positive pressure pre-oxygenation to minimize peri-intubation complications.

RESULTS

Our case series included 29 consecutive patients that met the inclusion criteria. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of the patients was 49.5±15.0 years. The mean±SD pre-intubation oxygenation of our cohort was 73.1±5.9%. All 29 intubations were successful on the first-pass attempt. Only one patient (3.4%) required a rescue paralytic to facilitate oral opening. Of note, 27/29 (93%) of the patients did not receive any immunizations (including partial) for COVID-19. There were no incidents of peri-intubation arrest (cardiac arrest within 30 minutes of induction) or aspiration.

CONCLUSIONS

In 29 physiologically difficult patients with acute respiratory failure, in whom the physician determined that RSI posed a higher than normal risk, FI assisted by VL, semi-Fowler positioning, and bilevel positive pressure pre-oxygenation resulted in excellent successful first-pass intubation rates without any incidences of peri-intubation arrest or aspiration. While this cohort was small, our study reveals that FI with midazolam does not likely pose a higher risk than ketamine-only intubation and warrants further study.

摘要

背景

辅助插管(FI)是指使用镇静剂或麻醉药物作为诱导剂进行插管,不使用肌肉松弛剂(神经肌肉阻滞剂)。相比之下,快速顺序诱导插管(RSI)既使用诱导剂又使用肌肉松弛剂。在进行直接喉镜检查时,RSI在首次插管成功率方面表现优于FI,并迅速被确立为所有情况下的金标准。最近,仅使用氯胺酮插管已用于解剖结构异常或不耐受呼吸暂停(物理和生理上的困难气道)的情况,这会增加无法插管/无法给氧情况或严重低氧血症的风险。由于全国范围内氯胺酮频繁且反复短缺,在当今时代,当其他有助于首次插管成功并减少并发症的因素(视频喉镜、探条使用、半福勒体位)普遍使用时,人们重新关注其他形式的FI是否可行。我们报告了一组病例,这些患有2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的严重低氧患者(生理上的困难气道)在全国氯胺酮短缺期间接受了FI,采用现代技术和设备以最大化首次插管成功率并最小化插管周围并发症。

方法

我们纳入了2021年8月25日至2021年10月22日期间在美国南部一家三级医疗中心就诊、插管前血氧饱和度低于80%(严重低氧血症)且需要插管的COVID-19肺炎患者。在这个特定队列中,患者使用咪达唑仑进行诱导气管插管,不使用肌肉松弛剂。我们使用视频辅助喉镜提高首次尝试的成功率,并将患者置于半福勒体位(床头抬高30 - 45°),并采用双水平正压预给氧以尽量减少插管周围并发症。

结果

我们的病例系列包括29例连续符合纳入标准的患者。患者的平均年龄±标准差为49.5±(加)15.0岁。我们队列的平均插管前氧合水平为73.1±(加)5.9%。所有29例插管首次尝试均成功。只有1例患者(3.4%)需要使用抢救性肌肉松弛剂以利于张口。值得注意的是,29例患者中有27例(93%)未接种任何(包括部分)COVID-19疫苗。没有发生插管周围心脏骤停(诱导后30分钟内心脏骤停)或误吸事件。

结论

在29例生理上存在困难的急性呼吸衰竭患者中,医生认为RSI带来的风险高于正常水平,采用视频喉镜、半福勒体位和双水平正压预给氧辅助的FI取得了极高的首次插管成功率,且没有发生任何插管周围心脏骤停或误吸事件。虽然该队列规模较小,但我们的研究表明,使用咪达唑仑的FI可能不会比仅使用氯胺酮插管带来更高的风险,值得进一步研究。