Qi Wei-Li, Wen Jun, Wen Tian-Fu, Peng Wei, Zhang Xiao-Yun, Shen Jun-Yi, Li Xiao, Li Chuan
Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Section for HepatoPancreatoBiliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University & The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu, Chongqing Medical University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Aug 27;15(8):1641-1651. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i8.1641.
Portal hypertension combined with esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) is a serious complication in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis in China. Splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization (SPD) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) are effective treatments for EGVB. However, a comparison of the effectiveness and safety of those methods is lacking.
To compare the prognosis after SPD TIPS for acute EGVB after failure of endoscopic therapy or secondary prophylaxis of variceal rebleeding (VRB) in patients with HBV-related cirrhosis combined with portal hypertension.
This retrospective cohort study included 318 patients with HBV-related cirrhosis and EGVB who underwent SPD or TIPS at West China Hospital of Sichuan University during 2009-2013. Propensity score-matched analysis (PSM), the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to compare overall survival, VRB rate, liver function abnormality rate, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence between the two patient groups.
The median age was 45.0 years ( = 318; 226 (71.1%) males). During a median follow-up duration of 43.0 mo, 18 (11.1%) and 33 (21.2%) patients died in the SPD and TIPS groups, respectively. After PSM, SPD was significantly associated with better overall survival (OS) ( = 0.01), lower rates of abnormal liver function ( < 0.001), and a lower incidence of HCC ( = 0.02) than TIPS. The VRB rate did not differ significantly between the two groups ( = 0.09).
Compared with TIPS, SPD is associated with higher postoperative OS rates, lower rates of abnormal liver function and HCC, and better quality of survival as acute EGVB treatment after failed endoscopic therapy or as secondary prophylaxis of VRB in patients with HBV-related cirrhosis combined with portal hypertension. There is no significant between-group difference in VRB rates.
门静脉高压合并食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血(EGVB)是中国乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)相关肝硬化患者的严重并发症。脾切除术加贲门周围血管离断术(SPD)和经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)是治疗EGVB的有效方法。然而,缺乏对这些方法有效性和安全性的比较。
比较SPD与TIPS治疗HBV相关肝硬化合并门静脉高压患者内镜治疗失败或静脉曲张再出血(VRB)二级预防后急性EGVB的预后。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2009年至2013年期间在四川大学华西医院接受SPD或TIPS治疗的318例HBV相关肝硬化和EGVB患者。采用倾向评分匹配分析(PSM)、Kaplan-Meier法和多因素Cox回归分析比较两组患者的总生存率、VRB率、肝功能异常率和肝细胞癌(HCC)发生率。
中位年龄为45.0岁(n = 318;226例(71.1%)为男性)。在中位随访43.0个月期间,SPD组和TIPS组分别有18例(11.1%)和33例(21.2%)患者死亡。PSM后,与TIPS相比,SPD与更好的总生存率(OS)(P = 0.01)、更低的肝功能异常率(P < 0.001)和更低的HCC发生率(P = 0.02)显著相关。两组之间的VRB率无显著差异(P = 0.09)。
与TIPS相比,SPD作为HBV相关肝硬化合并门静脉高压患者内镜治疗失败后急性EGVB的治疗或VRB的二级预防,术后OS率更高,肝功能异常率和HCC发生率更低,生存质量更好。两组之间的VRB率无显著差异。