Luo Shi-Hua, Chu Jian-Guo, Huang He, Yao Ke-Chun
Department of Radiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, Hubei Province, China.
Department of Radiology, Air Force Medical Center of PLA, Beijing 100142, China.
World J Clin Cases. 2019 Jul 6;7(13):1599-1610. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i13.1599.
There is a close relationship between cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has good clinical effect in treating the complication of portal hypertension. However, because of the risk of postoperative liver failure, severe complications, and low survival rate for HCC, TIPS is contraindicated in patients with portal hypertension and liver cancer. We studied a large cohort of patients with cirrhosis and HCC who underwent TIPS for recurrent variceal bleeding and/or ascites.
To assess the safety, efficacy, and survival rate in patients with HCC who underwent TIPS.
Group A comprised 217 patients with HCC and portal hypertension who underwent the TIPS procedure between 1999 and 2014. After TIPS deployment, these patients received palliative treatment for HCC. Group B comprised a cohort of 136 HCC patients with portal hypertension who did not undergo TIPS placement. Group B received palliative treatment for HCC plus medical therapy for portal hypertension. The clinical outcomes and survival rate were assessed.
In Group A, the primary technical success rate was 97.69% for TIPS placement, and no severe procedure-related complications of TIPS placement were reported. The control of variceal bleeding (VB) within 1 mo did not differ significantly between the groups ( = 0.261). Absorption of refractory ascites within 1 mo, recurrence of VB, and recurrence of refractory ascites differed significantly between the groups ( = 0.017, 0.023, and 0.009, respectively). By comparison, the rate of hepatic encephalopathy in Group B was lower than that in Group A ( 0.036). The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival rates were significantly different between Groups A and B (χ = 12.227, = 0.018; χ = 12.457, = 0.014; χ = 26.490, = 0.013; χ = 21.956, = 0.009, and χ = 24.596, = 0.006, respectively). The mean survival time was 43.7 mo in Group A and 31.8 mo in Group B. Median survival time was 50.0 mo in Group A and 33.0 mo in Group B. Mean and median survival differed significantly between the two groups ( = 0.000, χ = 35.605, log-rank test). The mortality rate from VB in Group A was low than that in Group B ( = 0.006), but the rates of hepatic tumor, hepatic failure, and multiorgan failure did not differ significantly between the two groups ( = 0.173, 0.246 and 0.257, respectively).
TIPS combined with palliative treatment is safe and effective for portal hypertension in patients with HCC.
肝硬化与肝细胞癌(HCC)之间存在密切关系。经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)在治疗门静脉高压并发症方面具有良好的临床效果。然而,由于术后肝衰竭风险、严重并发症以及HCC患者生存率较低,TIPS在门静脉高压合并肝癌患者中属禁忌。我们研究了一大群因复发性静脉曲张出血和/或腹水而接受TIPS治疗的肝硬化和HCC患者。
评估接受TIPS治疗的HCC患者的安全性、有效性和生存率。
A组包括1999年至2014年间接受TIPS手术的217例HCC合并门静脉高压患者。TIPS植入术后,这些患者接受了HCC的姑息治疗。B组包括136例未接受TIPS植入的HCC合并门静脉高压患者。B组接受了HCC的姑息治疗以及门静脉高压的药物治疗。评估了临床结局和生存率。
在A组中,TIPS植入的主要技术成功率为97.69%,未报告与手术相关的严重TIPS植入并发症。两组在1个月内对静脉曲张出血(VB)的控制无显著差异(=0.261)。两组在1个月内难治性腹水的吸收、VB复发和难治性腹水复发方面存在显著差异(分别为=0.017、0.023和0.009)。相比之下,B组肝性脑病的发生率低于A组(=0.036)。A组和B组的1年、2年、3年、4年和5年生存率存在显著差异(χ=12.227,=0.018;χ=12.457,=0.014;χ=26.490,=0.013;χ=21.956,=0.009,χ=24.596,=0.006)。A组的平均生存时间为43.7个月,B组为31.8个月。A组的中位生存时间为50.0个月,B组为33.0个月。两组的平均和中位生存存在显著差异(=0.000,χ=35.605,对数秩检验)。A组VB的死亡率低于B组(=0.006),但两组肝肿瘤、肝衰竭和多器官衰竭的发生率无显著差异(分别为=0.173、0.246和0.257)。
TIPS联合姑息治疗对HCC患者的门静脉高压是安全有效的。