Jung Yousung, Kim Hye-Jin, Kim Dongwook, Joo Bumjin, Jhoo Jin-Woo, Jang Aera
Department of Applied Animal Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Center for Food and Bioconvergence, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Food Sci Anim Resour. 2023 Sep;43(5):767-791. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2023.e35. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
To evaluate the effect of different cooking methods on the physicochemical quality and volatile organic compounds (VOC) of dairy beef round, twelve beef round pieces were divided into four groups: raw, boiling, microwave, and sous-vide. The sous-vide group had a higher pH than the boiling or microwave groups. The boiling group exhibited the highest shear force and CIE L*, followed by the microwave and sous-vide groups (p<0.05). The sous-vide group received higher taste and tenderness scores from panelists (p<0.05) and showed significantly higher levels of aspartic and glutamic acids than the other groups. The sous-vide and microwave groups had the highest oleic acid and polyunsaturated fatty acid levels, respectively. The sous-vide group had significantly higher hypoxanthine and inosine levels than the other groups. However, the microwave group had higher inosine monophosphate levels than the other groups. The sous-vide group had a higher alcohol content, including 1-octen-3-ol, than the other groups. Octanal and nonanal were the most abundant aldehydes in all groups. (R)-(-)-14-methyl-8-hexadecyn-1-ol, p-cresol, and 1-tridecyne were used to distinguish the VOC for each group in the multivariate analysis. Sous-vide could be effective in increasing meat tenderness as well as taste-related free amino acid (aspartic acid and glutamic acid) and fatty acid (oleic acid) levels. Furthermore, specific VOC, including 1-octen-3-ol, 2-ethylhexanal ethylene glycol acetal, and 2-octen-1-ol, (E)-, could be potential markers for distinguishing sous-vide from other cooking methods. Further studies are required to understand the mechanisms underlying the predominant association of these VOC with the sous-vide cooking method.
为评估不同烹饪方法对奶牛牛腩肉理化品质和挥发性有机化合物(VOC)的影响,将12块牛腩肉分成四组:生肉组、水煮组、微波组和低温慢煮组。低温慢煮组的pH值高于水煮组或微波组。水煮组的剪切力和CIE L*值最高,其次是微波组和低温慢煮组(p<0.05)。低温慢煮组得到的口感和嫩度评分高于评审员(p<0.05),且天冬氨酸和谷氨酸水平显著高于其他组。低温慢煮组和微波组的油酸和多不饱和脂肪酸水平分别最高。低温慢煮组的次黄嘌呤和肌苷水平显著高于其他组。然而,微波组的肌苷酸水平高于其他组。低温慢煮组的酒精含量更高,包括1-辛烯-3-醇,高于其他组。辛醛和壬醛是所有组中含量最丰富的醛类。在多变量分析中,(R)-(-)-14-甲基-8-十六碳炔-1-醇、对甲酚和1-十三炔用于区分每组的挥发性有机化合物。低温慢煮在提高肉的嫩度以及与风味相关的游离氨基酸(天冬氨酸和谷氨酸)和脂肪酸(油酸)水平方面可能是有效的。此外,特定的挥发性有机化合物,包括1-辛烯-3-醇、2-乙基己醛乙二醇缩醛和(E)-2-辛烯-1-醇,可能是区分低温慢煮与其他烹饪方法的潜在标志物。需要进一步研究以了解这些挥发性有机化合物与低温慢煮烹饪方法主要关联的潜在机制。