Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 大流行对新诊断骨质疏松症患者药物治疗的影响。

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on pharmacologic treatment of patients newly diagnosed with osteoporosis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States of America.

California Northstate University, College of Medicine, Elk Grove, CA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Sep 13;18(9):e0291472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291472. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study determined whether initiation of pharmacologic treatment was delayed for newly diagnosed osteoporosis patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

1,189 patients ≥50 years with newly diagnosed osteoporosis using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) screening at a single academic institution were included. Patients with previous osteoporosis were excluded. Patients diagnosed between March 1, 2018-January 31, 2020 (pre-pandemic cohort, n = 576) were compared to those diagnosed between March 1, 2020-January 31, 2022 (pandemic cohort, n = 613). Age, sex, race, ethnicity, ordering providers (primary vs specialty), and pharmacological agents were evaluated. Primary outcomes included proportion of patients prescribed therapy within 3 and 6-months of diagnosis, and mean time from diagnosis to treatment initiation.

RESULTS

The pre-pandemic cohort had more White patients (74.3 vs 68.4%, p = .02) and no differences between remaining demographic variables. Only 40.5% of newly diagnosed patients initiated pharmacologic therapy within 6 months. Patients treated at 3-months (31.8 vs 35.4%, p = 0.19) and 6-months (37.8 vs 42.9, p = 0.08) were comparable between cohorts (47.2 vs 50.2% p = 0.30). Mean time from diagnosis to treatment initiation was similar (46 vs 45 days, p = 0.72). There were no treatment differences based on gender, race, or ethnicity or between ordering providers (65.1 vs 57.4% primary care, p = 0.08). Bisphosphonates were most often prescribed in both cohorts (89% vs 82.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study assessing COVID-19's impact on pharmacologic treatment of newly diagnosed osteoporosis. 40.5% of newly diagnosed patients were treated pharmacologically within six months of diagnosis, and the pandemic did not significantly affect treatment rates.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定在 COVID-19 大流行期间,新诊断骨质疏松症患者的药物治疗是否延迟。

方法

纳入了一家学术机构使用双能 X 线吸收法(DXA)筛查新诊断骨质疏松症的 1189 名≥50 岁患者。排除了有既往骨质疏松症的患者。将 2018 年 3 月 1 日至 2020 年 1 月 31 日(大流行前队列,n=576)诊断的患者与 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2022 年 1 月 31 日(大流行队列,n=613)诊断的患者进行比较。评估了年龄、性别、种族、民族、开单医生(初级保健医生与专科医生)和药物治疗。主要结局包括在诊断后 3 个月和 6 个月内开具治疗药物的患者比例,以及从诊断到开始治疗的平均时间。

结果

大流行前队列中白人患者比例更高(74.3% vs. 68.4%,p=0.02),其余人口统计学变量无差异。只有 40.5%的新诊断患者在 6 个月内开始药物治疗。在 3 个月(31.8% vs. 35.4%,p=0.19)和 6 个月(37.8% vs. 42.9%,p=0.08)时接受治疗的患者在两组之间无差异(47.2% vs. 50.2%,p=0.30)。从诊断到开始治疗的平均时间相似(46 天 vs. 45 天,p=0.72)。根据性别、种族或民族或开单医生(初级保健医生 65.1% vs. 57.4%,p=0.08),治疗无差异。在两个队列中,双膦酸盐类药物最常被开具(89% vs. 82.1%)。

结论

这是第一项评估 COVID-19 对新诊断骨质疏松症药物治疗影响的研究。40.5%的新诊断患者在诊断后 6 个月内接受了药物治疗,大流行并未显著影响治疗率。

相似文献

8
The effect of osteoporosis management on proximal humeral fracture.骨质疏松症管理对肱骨近端骨折的影响。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Feb;24(2):191-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.07.005. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Bone fragility during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of macro- and micronutrients.新冠疫情期间的骨骼脆弱性:常量和微量营养素的作用
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2023 Mar 14;15:1759720X231158200. doi: 10.1177/1759720X231158200. eCollection 2023.
2
Osteoporosis in 2022: Care gaps to screening and personalised medicine.2022 年骨质疏松症:从护理差距到筛查和个体化医学。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Sep;36(3):101754. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2022.101754. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
3
Osteoporosis in 10 years time: a glimpse into the future of osteoporosis.十年后的骨质疏松症:展望骨质疏松症的未来
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2022 Mar 20;14:1759720X221083541. doi: 10.1177/1759720X221083541. eCollection 2022.
5
The Treatment Gap in Osteoporosis.骨质疏松症的治疗差距
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 5;10(13):3002. doi: 10.3390/jcm10133002.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验