Fanning Edel, Daniels Katherine, Cools Ann, Mullett Hannan, Delaney Ruth, McFadden Ciaran, Falvey Eanna
Manchester Met University, Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM.
University of Gent, Gent, BELGIUM.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2024 Jan 1;56(1):13-21. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003290. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
The primary aim was to identify and quantify differences in interlimb asymmetry magnitudes across a battery of upper extremity strength and performance tests at 4 and 6 months after glenohumeral joint stabilization surgery shoulder stabilization in contact and collision athletes compared with an un-injured group. A secondary aim was to investigate if identified asymmetry magnitudes changed from 4 to 6 months after glenohumeral joint stabilization surgery. The third aim was to explore associations within the different performance and strength variables.
Fifty-six male contact and collision sport athletes who had had undergone unilateral glenohumeral joint stabilization were tested at 4 and 6 months after surgery. An un-injured control group ( n = 39 for upper extremity performance tests, n = 47 for isokinetic dynamometry) were tested on a single occasion. Three upper extremity force platform-based performance tests and angle-specific concentric internal and external isokinetic shoulder rotational strength were assessed, and interlimb asymmetries were compared between the two groups.
At 4 months after surgery, the glenohumeral joint stabilization group demonstrated significantly higher absolute interlimb asymmetry values than the un-injured group for almost all the performance test variables. In the ballistic upper-body performance tests, the glenohumeral joint stabilization group achieved only half the body elevation reached by the un-injured (counter-movement push-up jump height ( η2 = 0.50) and press-jump jump height ( η2 = 0.39)). At 6 months after surgery, absolute interlimb asymmetries reduced for the performance test variables, but some asymmetry persisted. The glenohumeral joint stabilization group had significantly greater absolute interlimb asymmetries for five out the eight isokinetic variables.
Contact and collision athletes who may be cleared to return to sport at 4 to 6 months after glenohumeral joint stabilization surgery shoulder stabilization continue to demonstrate upper limb strength and performance deficits when compared with their un-injured limb and their un-injured counterparts.
主要目的是确定并量化在盂肱关节稳定手术后4个月和6个月时,接触性和碰撞性运动运动员与未受伤组相比,在一系列上肢力量和性能测试中的肢体间不对称程度差异。次要目的是调查在盂肱关节稳定手术后,已确定的不对称程度在4个月至6个月之间是否发生变化。第三个目的是探索不同性能和力量变量之间的关联。
对56名单侧盂肱关节稳定手术的男性接触性和碰撞性运动运动员在术后4个月和6个月进行测试。一个未受伤的对照组(上肢性能测试n = 39,等速测力法n = 47)仅进行一次测试。评估了三项基于上肢测力平台的性能测试以及特定角度的同心向心和离心等速肩部旋转力量,并比较了两组之间的肢体间不对称情况。
术后4个月,盂肱关节稳定组在几乎所有性能测试变量中,其绝对肢体间不对称值均显著高于未受伤组。在弹道式上身性能测试中,盂肱关节稳定组达到的身体抬高高度仅为未受伤组的一半(反向俯卧撑跳跃高度(η2 = 0.50)和推举跳跃高度(η2 = 0.39))。术后6个月,性能测试变量的绝对肢体间不对称情况有所减少,但仍存在一些不对称。在八项等速变量中的五项上,盂肱关节稳定组的绝对肢体间不对称情况显著更大。
在盂肱关节稳定手术后4至6个月可能被批准恢复运动的接触性和碰撞性运动运动员,与未受伤的肢体及未受伤的同龄人相比,上肢力量和性能仍存在不足。