Shevlin Mark, Redican Enya, Murphy Jamie, Hyland Philip, Karatzias Thanos
School of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.
J Trauma Stress. 2023 Dec;36(6):1077-1089. doi: 10.1002/jts.22972. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
The latent structure of ICD-11 prolonged grief disorder (PGD), as measured using the International Prolonged Grief Disorder Scale (IPGDS), was assessed in a large general population sample of bereaved adults from the United Kingdom. Data were derived from Wave 5 of the COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium Study (C19PRC-UK). Exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) was used to assess the latent structure of the IPGDS. Identified factors were explored in relation to known correlates (i.e., gender, age of the bereaved, income, bereavement timeframe, age of the deceased) and functional impairment. Three factors-Loss, Emotional Numbing, and Emotional Reactivity-emerged in the best-fitting ESEM model, χ (92, N = 1,763) = 273.70, p < .001, CFI = .97, TLI = .96, RMSEA = .048, SRMR = .020. All factors were significantly associated with bereavement timeframe, βs = -.15--.20, and age of the deceased, βs = -.22--.31. Lower income predicted both Loss and Emotional Numbing; younger age of the bereaved predicted both Loss and Emotional Reactivity; and female gender was a unique predictor of Loss. Functional impairment was associated only with Emotional Numbing, β = .89. The findings highlight the multidimensional structure of PGD. However, the patterns of factor/cross-factor loadings observed in the present study indicate that a "simple" structure was not attainable. Associations between factors and covariates attest to the discriminant validity of the factors, and the association between Emotional Numbing and functional impairment may afford clinicians an opportunity to better understand and target the most disruptive features of grief.
在来自英国的大量丧亲成年人普通人群样本中,使用国际持续性悲伤障碍量表(IPGDS)对国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)持续性悲伤障碍(PGD)的潜在结构进行了评估。数据来源于新冠疫情心理研究联盟研究(C19PRC - UK)的第5波调查。采用探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)来评估IPGDS的潜在结构。探讨了所确定的因素与已知相关因素(即性别、丧亲者年龄、收入、丧亲时间范围、逝者年龄)及功能损害之间的关系。在最佳拟合的ESEM模型中出现了三个因素——丧失、情感麻木和情感反应性,χ(92, N = 1763) = 273.70,p <.001,CFI =.97,TLI =.96,RMSEA =.048,SRMR =.020。所有因素均与丧亲时间范围显著相关,β值为 -.15至 -.20,与逝者年龄显著相关,β值为 -.22至 -.31。较低收入预测了丧失和情感麻木;丧亲者较年轻预测了丧失和情感反应性;女性是丧失的唯一预测因素。功能损害仅与情感麻木相关,β =.89。研究结果突出了PGD的多维结构。然而,本研究中观察到的因素/交叉因素负荷模式表明无法实现“简单”结构。因素与协变量之间的关联证明了这些因素的区分效度,情感麻木与功能损害之间的关联可能为临床医生提供一个机会,以更好地理解和针对悲伤中最具破坏性的特征。