• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Symptoms and levels of ICD-11 Prolonged Grief Disorder in a representative community sample of UK adults.英国成年人代表性社区样本中 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍的症状和程度。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2023 Oct;58(10):1535-1547. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02469-1. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
2
Prevalence and correlates of ICD-11-based prolonged grief disorder in a representative Slovakian sample of recently bereaved adults.在最近丧亲的成年斯洛伐克代表性样本中,基于 ICD-11 的延长哀伤障碍的患病率及其相关因素。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2381368. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2381368. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
3
Valid measurement of DSM-5 persistent complex bereavement disorder and DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 prolonged grief disorder: The Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report Plus (TGI-SR+).DSM-5 持续性复杂丧亲障碍和 DSM-5-TR 及 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍的有效测量:创伤后悲伤量表-自我报告加项(TGI-SR+)。
Compr Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;112:152281. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152281. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
4
Comparison of DSM-5 criteria for persistent complex bereavement disorder and ICD-11 criteria for prolonged grief disorder in help-seeking bereaved children.寻求帮助的丧亲儿童中 DSM-5 持续性复杂丧亲障碍标准与 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍标准的比较。
J Affect Disord. 2019 May 1;250:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.02.046. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
5
The Traumatic Grief Inventory-Clinician Administered: A psychometric evaluation of a new interview for ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR prolonged grief disorder severity and probable caseness.创伤性悲伤量表-临床医生施测版:对一种用于评估国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版修订版(DSM-5-TR)中延长悲伤障碍严重程度及可能病例的新访谈工具的心理测量学评价
J Affect Disord. 2023 Jun 1;330:188-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
6
Prevalence and correlates of ICD-11 prolonged grief disorder among adults living in Ukraine during the war with Russia.在俄乌战争期间,居住在乌克兰的成年人中 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍的患病率及其相关因素。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2024 May;149(5):425-435. doi: 10.1111/acps.13678. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
7
Further evaluation of the factor structure, prevalence, and concurrent validity of DSM-5 criteria for Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder and ICD-11 criteria for Prolonged Grief Disorder.进一步评估 DSM-5 持续性复杂丧亲障碍标准和 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍标准的因子结构、患病率和同时效度。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Mar;273:206-210. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
8
Measurement and assessment of grief in a large international sample.在一个大型国际样本中对悲伤的测量与评估。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Apr 14;327:306-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.095. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
9
Testing the latent structure of ICD-11 prolonged grief disorder symptoms in the U.K. adult population: An exploratory structural equation modeling approach.测试英国成年人群中ICD-11持续性悲伤障碍症状的潜在结构:一种探索性结构方程建模方法。
J Trauma Stress. 2023 Dec;36(6):1077-1089. doi: 10.1002/jts.22972. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
10
ICD-11 prolonged grief disorder: Prevalence, predictors, and co-occurrence in a large representative sample.ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍:在一个大型代表性样本中的患病率、预测因素和共病情况。
Int J Psychol. 2024 Feb;59(1):86-95. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12951. Epub 2023 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence rates of prolonged grief disorder are overestimated.持续性悲伤障碍的患病率被高估了。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2520634. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2520634. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
2
The prevalence of prolonged grief disorder according to the international classification of diseases 11: a scoping review.根据《国际疾病分类第11版》的持续性悲伤障碍患病率:一项范围综述
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02046-4.
3
Prevalence and correlates of ICD-11-based prolonged grief disorder in a representative Slovakian sample of recently bereaved adults.在最近丧亲的成年斯洛伐克代表性样本中,基于 ICD-11 的延长哀伤障碍的患病率及其相关因素。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2381368. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2381368. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
4
Development and validation of the caregiver-report version of the international grief questionnaire (IGQ-CG): Results from a Ukrainian sample of parents.发展并验证了照顾者报告版国际悲痛问卷(IGQ-CG):来自乌克兰父母样本的结果。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;29(4):1481-1496. doi: 10.1177/13591045241260897. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
5
Prolonged grief disorder symptomology in three African countries: A network analysis and comparison.三个非洲国家的持续性悲伤障碍症状学:一项网络分析与比较
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2024 Apr 29;11:e57. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.54. eCollection 2024.
6
Prolonged grief disorder in an inpatient psychiatric sample: psychometric properties of a new clinical interview and preliminary prevalence.住院精神病患者中的持续性悲伤障碍:新临床访谈的心理测量特性和初步患病率。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 May 1;24(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05784-2.
7
Prolonged grief during and beyond the pandemic: factors associated with levels of grief in a four time-point longitudinal survey of people bereaved in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.大流行期间和之后的长期悲痛:在 COVID-19 大流行第一年丧亲的人群进行的四次时间点纵向调查中,与悲痛程度相关的因素。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 19;11:1215881. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1215881. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Examination of the New ICD-11 Prolonged Grief Disorder Guidelines Across Five International Samples.对新的国际疾病分类第11版持续性悲伤障碍指南在五个国际样本中的检验。
Clin Psychol Eur. 2021 Mar 10;3(1):e4159. doi: 10.32872/cpe.4159. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Tracking the psychological and socio-economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: A methodological report from Wave 5 of the COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study.追踪 COVID-19 大流行对英国心理和社会经济影响的方法学报告:来自 COVID-19 心理研究联盟(C19PRC)研究第 5 波的报告。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2022 Dec;31(4):e1928. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1928. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
3
The ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR prolonged grief criteria: Validation of the Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report Plus using exploratory factor analysis and item response theory.《ICD-11 和 DSM-5-TR 延长哀伤标准:使用探索性因子分析和项目反应理论验证创伤后哀伤量表自评版》
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2022 Nov;29(6):1950-1962. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2765. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
4
COVID-19, natural, and unnatural bereavement: comprehensive comparisons of loss circumstances and grief severity.COVID-19、自然和非自然丧亲:损失情况和悲伤严重程度的综合比较。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 May 9;13(1):2062998. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2062998. eCollection 2022.
5
Emerging experience with selected new categories in the ICD-11: complex PTSD, prolonged grief disorder, gaming disorder, and compulsive sexual behaviour disorder.国际疾病分类第11版中选定新类别(复杂创伤后应激障碍、持续性悲伤障碍、游戏障碍和强迫性性行为障碍)的新经验。
World Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;21(2):189-213. doi: 10.1002/wps.20960.
6
Sharing data to better understand one of the world's most significant shared experiences: data resource profile of the longitudinal COVID-19 psychological research consortium (C19PRC) study.分享数据以更好地了解世界上最重要的共同经历之一:COVID-19 纵向心理研究联合会(C19PRC)研究的数据资源简介。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2022 Feb 7;5(4):1704. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i4.1704. eCollection 2020.
7
Are deaths from COVID-19 associated with higher rates of prolonged grief disorder (PGD) than deaths from other causes?COVID-19 死亡是否与其他原因导致的死亡相比,与更高的持续性悲伤障碍(PGD)发生率相关?
Death Stud. 2022;46(6):1287-1296. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2022.2039326. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
8
Valid measurement of DSM-5 persistent complex bereavement disorder and DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 prolonged grief disorder: The Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report Plus (TGI-SR+).DSM-5 持续性复杂丧亲障碍和 DSM-5-TR 及 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍的有效测量:创伤后悲伤量表-自我报告加项(TGI-SR+)。
Compr Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;112:152281. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152281. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
9
A systematic review of loneliness in bereavement: Current research and future directions.丧亲之痛中的孤独感的系统评价:当前研究与未来方向。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Feb;43:48-64. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
10
Who suffered most after deaths due to COVID-19? Prevalence and correlates of prolonged grief disorder in COVID-19 related bereaved adults.COVID-19 死亡后谁最痛苦?COVID-19 相关丧亲成年人中持续性悲伤障碍的患病率及相关因素。
Global Health. 2021 Feb 11;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00669-5.

英国成年人代表性社区样本中 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍的症状和程度。

Symptoms and levels of ICD-11 Prolonged Grief Disorder in a representative community sample of UK adults.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Ulster University, Cromore Road, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, Northern Ireland.

Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2023 Oct;58(10):1535-1547. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02469-1. Epub 2023 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00127-023-02469-1
PMID:37039844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10098228/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) is a new disorder included in ICD-11 (WHO, 2018). There is a growing body of literature surrounding the prevalence and correlates of ICD-11 PGD symptoms as assessed using various measures. This study was the first to assess levels of ICD-11 PGD symptoms as measured by the International Prolonged Grief Disorder Scale (IPGDS), a self-report scale directly aligned with the ICD-11 definition of PGD, among the United Kingdom adult general population, and identify correlates.

METHOD

Participants included 2025 adults who participated in Wave 5 of the COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium Study (C19PRC-UK). Prevalence rates of PGD were estimated based on two commonly used algorithms defined as 'strict' and 'moderate'. Sociodemographic, loss-related, and mental health correlates (i.e., anxiety, depression, mental health treatment seeking, loneliness) of strict and moderate PGD were then examined using multinomial logistic regressions.

RESULTS

It was found that 2.4% (n = 43) of participants met probable caseness for PGD using the strict criteria while 7.9% (n = 140) met probable caseness for PGD using the moderate criteria. Multinomial logistic regression analysis results showed, as predicted, that income, time since bereavement, death of a child, religiosity, and depression were associated with both moderate and strict PGD. Correlates of moderate PGD included country of residence, urbanicity, younger age of bereaved, and loneliness.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights that some symptoms of PGD are commonly reported in the general population, although relatively few meet the criteria for clinical significance. The routine assessment for PGD following a bereavement is discussed and the development of appropriate interventions are recommended.

摘要

背景

延长哀伤障碍(PGD)是 ICD-11(世界卫生组织,2018 年)中新增的一种障碍。围绕使用各种测量方法评估 ICD-11PGD 症状的流行率和相关性,已经有越来越多的文献。这项研究首次评估了国际延长哀伤障碍量表(IPGDS)测量的 ICD-11PGD 症状水平,该量表是一种与 ICD-11PGD 定义直接一致的自我报告量表,在英国成年普通人群中,并确定了其相关性。

方法

参与者包括参加 COVID-19 心理研究联盟研究(C19PRC-UK)第 5 波的 2025 名成年人。根据两种常用的算法定义为“严格”和“中度”,估计 PGD 的患病率。然后使用多项逻辑回归分析了严格和中度 PGD 的社会人口统计学、损失相关和心理健康相关性(即焦虑、抑郁、心理健康治疗寻求、孤独)。

结果

发现使用严格标准,43 名(2.4%)参与者符合 PGD 可能病例,而使用中度标准,140 名(7.9%)参与者符合 PGD 可能病例。多项逻辑回归分析结果表明,正如预测的那样,收入、丧亲时间、儿童死亡、宗教信仰和抑郁与中度和严格 PGD 都相关。中度 PGD 的相关性包括居住国家、城市化程度、丧亲者年龄较小和孤独感。

结论

这项研究强调,PGD 的一些症状在普通人群中很常见,尽管只有相对较少的人符合临床意义的标准。讨论了在丧亲后常规评估 PGD 的问题,并建议开发适当的干预措施。