Division of Sports and Exercise Medicine, Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, SWITZERLAND.
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Basel, Basel, SWITZERLAND.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2024 Feb 1;56(2):159-169. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003293. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
Well-trained staff is needed to interpret cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET). We aimed to examine the accuracy of machine learning-based algorithms to classify exercise limitations and their severity in clinical practice compared with expert consensus using patients presenting at a pulmonary clinic.
This study included 200 historical CPET data sets (48.5% female) of patients older than 40 yr referred for CPET because of unexplained dyspnea, preoperative examination, and evaluation of therapy progress. Data sets were independently rated by experts according to the severity of pulmonary-vascular, mechanical-ventilatory, cardiocirculatory, and muscular limitations using a visual analog scale. Decision trees and random forests analyses were calculated.
Mean deviations between experts in the respective limitation categories ranged from 1.0 to 1.1 points (SD, 1.2) before consensus. Random forests identified parameters of particular importance for detecting specific constraints. Central parameters were nadir ventilatory efficiency for CO 2 , ventilatory efficiency slope for CO 2 (pulmonary-vascular limitations); breathing reserve, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and forced vital capacity (mechanical-ventilatory limitations); and peak oxygen uptake, O 2 uptake/work rate slope, and % change of the latter (cardiocirculatory limitations). Thresholds differentiating between different limitation severities were reported. The accuracy of the most accurate decision tree of each category was comparable to expert ratings. Finally, a combined decision tree was created quantifying combined system limitations within one patient.
Machine learning-based algorithms may be a viable option to facilitate the interpretation of CPET and identify exercise limitations. Our findings may further support clinical decision making and aid the development of standardized rating instruments.
心肺运动试验(CPET)需要经过专业培训的人员进行解读。我们旨在比较机器学习算法和专家共识,以评估其在临床实践中对运动受限及其严重程度的分类准确性,研究对象为就诊于呼吸科门诊的患者。
本研究纳入了 200 例年龄大于 40 岁的患者的 CPET 历史数据集(48.5%为女性),这些患者因不明原因的呼吸困难、术前检查或评估治疗进展而接受 CPET。数据由专家独立使用视觉模拟量表根据肺血管、机械通气、心肺循环和肌肉受限的严重程度进行评分。并计算决策树和随机森林分析。
在达成共识之前,专家在各自受限类别中的平均偏差范围为 1.0 到 1.1 分(SD,1.2)。随机森林确定了对检测特定限制特别重要的参数。中心参数为二氧化碳通气效率最小值、二氧化碳通气效率斜率(肺血管限制);呼吸储备、1 秒用力呼气量和用力肺活量(机械通气限制);峰值摄氧量、摄氧量/工作速率斜率和后者的百分比变化(心肺循环限制)。报告了区分不同限制严重程度的阈值。每个类别的最准确决策树的准确性可与专家评分相媲美。最后,创建了一个综合决策树,对单个患者的综合系统限制进行量化。
基于机器学习的算法可能是一种可行的选择,有助于 CPET 的解读和识别运动受限。我们的研究结果可能进一步支持临床决策,并有助于制定标准化评分工具。